bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.10.21.513067

Evidence for an Intricate Relationship Between Express Visuomotor Responses, Postural Control and Rapid Step Initiation in the Lower Limbs

Abstract

Recent work has described express visuomotor responses (EVRs) on the upper limb. EVRs are directionally-tuned bursts of muscle activity that occur within 100 ms of visual stimulus appearance, facilitating rapid reaching. Rapid stepping responses are also important in daily life, and while there is evidence of EVR expression on lower limbs, it is unknown whether lower-limb EVRs are influenced by increased postural demands. Here, we investigate the interaction between stepping-related EVRs and anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) that typically precede step initiation. 16 healthy young subjects rapidly stepped towards visual targets presented in front of the left or right foot. We recorded bilateral surface EMG of gluteus medius (GM), a muscle involved in both APAs and stepping, and bilateral ground reaction forces. Two conditions were introduced: an anterolateral or anteromedial stepping condition with reduced or increased postural demands, respectively. In the anterolateral stepping condition, EVRs were robustly and strongly present in stance-side GM, and ground reaction forces revealed strongly decreased expression of APAs. Larger EVRs preceded shorter RTs, consistent with EVRs facilitating step initiation. In contrast, in the anteromedial stepping condition, EVRs were largely absent, and ground reaction forces revealed the consistent expression of APAs. When occasionally present, EVRs in the anteromedial stepping condition preceded larger APAs and longer RTs. Thus, while EVRs in lower limbs can facilitate rapid stepping, their expression is normally suppressed when postural stability is low. Failing to appropriately suppress EVRs in such situations disrupts postural stability, necessitating larger compensatory APAs and leading to longer stepping RTs. Key PointsO_LIExpress visuomotor responses (EVRs) are directionally tuned bursts of muscle activity that aid the rapid initiation of a goal-directed movement. They are thought to be relayed to the motor periphery along a rapid subcortical pathway involving the superior colliculus. C_LIO_LIWhile EVRs have predominantly been studied in reaching, it is unclear whether EVRs extend to the lower extremities and if so, whether increasing the postural demands of a stepping task interfere with lower-limb EVR expression. C_LIO_LIWe found that when postural demands were low, strong EVRs in the hip abductor muscle gluteus medius facilitated a rapid stepping response. Conversely, when postural demands were high, EVRs hindered a fast stepping response, as they necessitated larger, compensatory postural adjustments prior to step onset. C_LIO_LIThese results help us better understand the interaction between ultra-rapid visuomotor transformations in the EVR network, the postural demands of a given stepping task, and subsequent step initiation. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Billen, L. S., Corneil, B. D., Weerdesteyn, V.. 2022-10-24. Evidence for an Intricate Relationship Between Express Visuomotor Responses, Postural Control and Rapid Step Initiation in the Lower Limbs. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.21.513067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗