What does heritability of Alzheimer's disease represent?

Baker, E. A.; Leonenko, G.; Schmidt, K. M.; Hill, M.; Myers, A. J.; Shoai, M.; de Rojas, I.; Tesi, N.; Holstege, H.; van der Flier, W. M.; Pijnenburg, Y. A. L.; Ruiz, A.; Hardy, J.; van der Lee, S.; Escott-Price, V.

doi:10.1101/2022.09.07.506912

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.09.07.506912

What does heritability of Alzheimer's disease represent?

Baker, E. A.·Leonenko, G.·Schmidt, K. M.·Hill, M.·Myers, A. J.·Shoai, M.·de Rojas, I.·Tesi, N.·Holstege, H.·van der Flier, W. M.·Pijnenburg, Y. A. L.·Ruiz, A.·Hardy, J.·van der Lee, S.·Escott-Price, V.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONBoth Alzheimers disease (AD) and ageing have a strong genetic component. In each case, many associated variants have been discovered, but how much missing heritability remains to be discovered is debated. Variability in the estimation of SNP-based heritability could explain the differences in reported heritability. METHODSWe compute heritability in five large independent cohorts (N=7,396, 1,566, 803, 12,528 and 3,963) to determine whether a consensus for the AD heritability estimate can be reached. These cohorts vary by sample size, age of cases and controls and phenotype definition. We compute heritability a) for all SNPs, b) excluding APOE region, c) excluding both APOE and genome-wide association study hit regions, and d) SNPs overlapping a microglia gene-set. RESULTSSNP-based heritability of Alzheimers disease is between 38 and 66% when age and genetic disease architecture are correctly accounted for. The heritability estimates decrease by 12% [SD=8%] on average when the APOE region is excluded and an additional 1% [SD=3%] when genome-wide significant regions were removed. A microglia gene-set explains 69-84% of our estimates of SNP-based heritability using only 3% of total SNPs in all cohorts. CONCLUSIONThe heritability of neurodegenerative disorders cannot be represented as a single number, because it is dependent on the ages of cases and controls. Genome-wide association studies pick up a large proportion of total AD heritability when age and genetic architecture are correctly accounted for. Around 13% of SNP-based heritability can be explained by known genetic loci and the remaining heritability likely resides around microglial related genes. Author SummaryEstimates of heritability in Alzheimers disease, the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by genetics, are very varied across different studies, therefore, the amount of missing heritability not yet captured by current genome-wide association studies is debated. We investigate this in five independent cohorts, provide estimates based on these cohorts and detail necessary suggestions to accurately calculate heritability in age-related disorders. We also confirm the importance of microglia relevant genetic markers in Alzheimers disease. This manuscript provides suggestions for other researchers computing heritability in late-onset disorders and the microglia gene-set used in this study will be published alongside this manuscript and made available to other researchers. The correct assessment of disease heritability will aid in better understanding the amount of missing heritability in Alzheimers disease.

Explore related subjects

genetics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Baker, E. A., Leonenko, G., Schmidt, K. M., Hill, M., Myers, A. J., Shoai, M., de Rojas, I., Tesi, N., Holstege, H., van der Flier, W. M., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Ruiz, A., Hardy, J., van der Lee, S., Escott-Price, V.. 2022-09-08. What does heritability of Alzheimer's disease represent?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.07.506912

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A largely shared genetic architecture underlies Saccharomyces cerevisiae persistence across different mouse host genotypes

The extent to which interactions between microbial and host genotypes shape opportunistic pathogen persistence within hosts is an important open question. To assess the contribution of these interactions to persistence, we used Saccharomyces cerevisiae , a genetically tractable model for studying opportunistic fungal persistence in mammalian hosts. A pooled panel of barcoded haploid segregants from a cross between a laboratory strain and a clinical isolate, together with both parents, was introduced intravenously into seven genetically diverse mouse strains. We measured the relative persistence of segregants in mouse brains and livers using barcode sequencing. Persistence showed transgressive segregation in both organs. On average across the two organs, yeast genotype explained 45.2% of the variance in segregant persistence, whereas yeast genotype-by-host genotype interactions explained only 2.9%. Linkage mapping showed that loci detected in more host genotypes generally explained more phenotypic variance than those detected in fewer host genotypes. At some loci, genetic variation correlated with increased yeast persistence across multiple organs (general loci) while at others increased persistence in one organ came at the cost of decreased persistence in another (antagonistic loci). General loci contributed disproportionately to brain persistence, whereas liver persistence reflected contributions from both classes. The clinical parent showed greater persistence than the laboratory parent in every host-organ combination, and the additive effects of detected loci predicted the direction of this advantage. Overall, this work shows that in this system, relative microbial persistence is polygenic, with a strong additive component and only a very small contribution from microbial genotype-by-host genotype interactions.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2026

Host control and regulation of human anellovirus persistence

Anelloviruses are the most abundant and diverse eukaryotic viruses known to infect humans and can persist throughout our lifetimes. Despite their ubiquity, the host factors governing their physiologic distribution and abundance remain poorly understood. Here, we construct a viral pangenome of 2,023 strains to quantify anellovirus DNA in >1.1 million participants spanning three genetic biobanks. Genome-wide association studies identify 121 loci linked to viral persistence, predominantly via immune regulation by NF-kB signaling. Further, we associate variable anellovirus detection with conditions characterized by immune dysfunction, including lymphoid malignancies. By screening 3.2 petabases of human single-cell sequencing data, we identify myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow as a prominent site of anellovirus transcription in vivo. Finally, Perturb-seq of anellovirus proteins reveals that anellovirus ORF2, particularly from Alphatorquevirus, attenuates TNF-a-induced NF-kB signaling, connecting host genetic variation, cellular context, and viral immunomodulation to characterize the persistence of the eukaryotic human virome's most abundant component.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2026

Regulation of sociality and neuronal development by the translation initiation factor eIF4H1 in Drosophila

Most animal species exhibit some level of sociality. However, whether sociality-related traits evolved independently, or are instead derived from common core mechanisms, remains controversial. Nevertheless, an emerging theoretical framework stipulates that key aspects of how animals interact with their social environments may be regulated by a phylogenetically conserved genetic toolkit. Therefore, we hypothesized that mutations that lead to social deficits in specific human disorders may implicate genes that play conserved roles in the regulation of core social traits across Animalia. Specifically, here we focus on genes associated with Williams syndrome (WS), a rare human multi-system disorder characterized in part by hypersocial cognitive traits. WS is caused by a hemizygous chromosomal microdeletion of 25-28 protein-coding genes. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that haploinsufficiency in at least one of these genes plays an important role in the development and/or function of social neural circuits in humans. Because the Drosophila genome encodes orthologs of 17 of the 28 genes deleted in WS, we reasoned that at least some of them may serve a conserved role in the regulation of social traits across flies and humans, as predicted by the genetic toolkit framework. Using a neuron-specific RNAi knockdown screen, we identified eIF4H1, an ortholog of a highly conserved subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation complex eIF4F, as a candidate gene for neuronal regulation of sociality in the fly. We show that eIF4H1 expression is predominantly neuronal in the adult fly brain, and that its action plays a differential role in the organization of specific dopaminergic neuron subtypes that are associated with sociality and cognitive functions. These results indicate that eIF4H1 may serve a conserved function in regulating the development of the neuronal circuits that regulate social behaviors, thus supporting the idea of a conserved sociality genetic toolkit.

genetics↗