bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.08.19.504504
Why does the error negativity peak higher when accuracy is emphasised over speed? The impact of noise and single-trial latency variability challenges traditional interpretations
Abstract
Understanding human error processing is a highly relevant interdisciplinary goal. More than 30 years of research in this field have established the error negativity (Ne) as a fundamental electrophysiological marker of various types of erroneous decisions (e.g. perceptual, economic) and related clinically relevant variations. A common finding is that the Ne is more pronounced when participants are instructed to focus on response accuracy rather than response speed, an observation that has been interpreted as reflecting more thorough error processing. We challenge this wide-spread interpretation by demonstrating that when controlling for the level of non-event-related noise in the participant-average waveform and for single-trial peak latency variability, the significant speed-accuracy difference in the participant-average waveform vanishes. This suggests that the previously reported Ne differences may be mostly attributable to a more precise alignment of neuro-cognitive processes and not (only) to more intense error processing under accuracy instructions, opening up novel perspectives on previous findings.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Mattes, A., Porth, E., Niessen, E., Kummer, K., Mück, M., Stahl, J.. 2022-08-19. Why does the error negativity peak higher when accuracy is emphasised over speed? The impact of noise and single-trial latency variability challenges traditional interpretations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.19.504504
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.