bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.08.09.503321

Limbic progesterone receptors regulate spatial memory

Abstract

Progesterone and its receptors (PRs) participate in mating and reproduction, but their role in spatial declarative memory, is not understood. Male and female mice express PRs in regions that support spatial memory: the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. PRs were predominantly expressed in excitatory neurons in Pgr-Cre mice injected with AAV-delivered flexed tdTomato. Furthermore, segesterone, a specific PR agonist, activated neurons in the entorhinal cortex (EC) and the hippocampus. We assessed the PR function in these spatial memory circuit neurons by examining the performance of mice lacking this receptor (PRKO) in novel object recognition, object placement, and Y-maze alternation tasks. In the recognition test, wild-type littermates spent significantly more time exploring the new object than male PRKO mice. The EC-specific deletion of PRs was sufficient to induce a deficit in detecting familiar versus never experienced or new objects. We confirmed deficits in spatial memory of PRKO mice by testing them on the Y-maze forced alternation task. In contrast to spatial tasks, PR removal did not alter the response to fear conditioning. PRs also support spatial memory in female mice. These studies provide novel insights into the role of PR in facilitating spatial, declarative memory in males and females, which may help with finding reproductive partners. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTBrain progesterone receptors play an essential role in facilitating mating and reproductive behaviors, but their role in spatial memory and, therefore, mate-finding is not described. Principal, excitatory neurons of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus express progesterone receptors. These receptors facilitate spatial memory in male and female mice, which may enhance mate-finding reproductive function and food foraging.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joshi, S., Williams, C. L., Kapur, J.. 2022-08-11. Limbic progesterone receptors regulate spatial memory. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.09.503321

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Novel Tau Interaction Partners as Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Alzheimers disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to cognitive decline and ultimately death. One of the main hallmarks of this disease is the accumulation of pathological tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles. To better understand these pathological mechanisms, it is essential to characterize the tau protein interactome in health and disease. In this study, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using a human brain cDNA library, from which we identified 15 novel tau-interacting proteins that bind to full-length human tau, or its fragments: the N-terminus, microtubule-binding domain, or C-terminus. We subsequently validated these novel interactions using in vitro co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization assays with both physiological and pathological tau isoforms. Furthermore, their interactions with the human tau protein were analyzed using surface plasmon resonance. Finally, an in silico interactome analysis of these newly discovered tau-binding partners revealed several additional interactors that can link them to downstream processes critical to neurodegenerative pathways Our findings offer fresh insights into tau biology and highlight novel targets for therapeutic intervention and biomarker development.

neuroscience↗

Early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for temporal attention: A TMS study

Temporal attention enhances the selective processing of information at a specific point in time and improves perception. Previous neuroimaging studies investigating its neural mechanisms have either conflated temporal attention with temporal expectation or provided correlational evidence. Thus, whether early visual cortex is functionally necessary for temporal attention remains unknown. Here, we combined psychophysics with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine whether V1/V2 are functionally necessary and play a causal role in temporal attention. Observers performed an orientation-discrimination task in which two consecutive stimuli, T1 and T2, were presented in the periphery, preceded by a precue providing either valid or neutral temporal information. Double-pulse TMS was delivered under four conditions: at T1 (T1-TMS), at T2 (T2-TMS), at both T1 and T2 (both-TMS), or not at all (none-TMS), to assess its effects on temporal attention and the efficacy of the stimulation was verified by pupil size analysis. Behavioral results revealed robust temporal attention benefits on d', reaction time, and the Balanced Integration Score (BIS) across all four TMS conditions, indicating that the benefits of temporal attention were unaffected by occipital TMS. Furthermore, pupil dilation was largest in the both-TMS condition, followed by the T1-TMS and T2-TMS conditions, and smallest in the none-TMS condition, providing physiological verification of the stimulation protocol. Together, these findings reveal the first causal evidence that the early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for endogenous temporal attention.

neuroscience↗

Disentanglement of persistent and dynamic neural substrates of working memory

Competing theories of working memory have alternatively emphasized the importance of persistent and dynamic substrates of this cognitive function. Here, we directly tested these theories by computationally isolating the contributions of persistent and dynamic activity to working memory. We analyzed neuronal population activity recordings in macaques doing match/non-match working memory tasks. We first extracted signatures of persistent and dynamic activity through cue-specific temporal means, temporal principal components, and correlations of activity patterns across task epochs. We then generated synthetic data constrained by these signatures, and decoded cue stimuli from these data, separately from persistent and non-persistent neurons. We found that high decoding performance arose from a nuanced interplay of persistent and dynamic activity. Specifically, we could decode stimuli at empirical or above-chance levels across all tasks only from persistent neurons, but only after constraining correlations of activity patterns across epochs. In this way, we showed distinct roles for persistent and dynamic neuronal activity that help to unify two competing theories of working memory. More broadly, we also advanced computational controlled experiments as a principled framework for adjudicating between competing models of neuronal population activity.

neuroscience↗