bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.08.03.502617

Training the next generation of researchers in the Organ-on-Chip field

Moruzzi, A.·Shroff, T.·Keller, S.·Loskill, P.·Cipriano, M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Organ-on-chip (OoC) technology bridges the principles of biology and engineering to create a new generation of in vitro models and involves highly interdisciplinary collaboration across STEM disciplines. Training the next generation of scientists, technicians and policy makers is a challenge that requires a tailored effort. To promote the qualification, usability, uptake and long-term development of OoC technology, we designed a questionnaire to evaluate the key aspects for training, identify the major stakeholders to be trained, their professional level and specific skillset. The 151 respondents unanimously agreed on the need to train the next generation of OoC researchers and that the training should be provided early, in interdisciplinary subjects and throughout the researchers career. We identified two key training priorities: (i) training scientists with a biology background in microfabrication and microfluidics principles and (ii) training OoC developers in pharmacology/toxicology. This makes training in OoC a transdisciplinary challenge rather than an interdisciplinary one. The data acquired and analyzed here serves to guide training initiatives for preparing competent and transdisciplinary researchers, capable of assuring the successful development and application of OoC technologies in academic research, pharmaceutical/chemical/cosmetic industries, personalized medicine and clinical trials on chip.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moruzzi, A., Shroff, T., Keller, S., Loskill, P., Cipriano, M.. 2022-08-05. Training the next generation of researchers in the Organ-on-Chip field. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.03.502617

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

FUNCTIONAL AGEING: A Science-Technology-Society Approach to teach Ageing and Age-related Diseases

PurposeAgeing is a complex biological process that involves numerous genes and pathways. Experimental studies have identified several of these genes and pathways that that can extend or shorten an individuals lifespan. Understanding these genes and pathways can help develop interventions that improve health and quality of life of older people. Nonetheless, as the global population continues to age, it is essential to comprehend the ageing processs impact on society. Functional age is defined as a combination of chronological, biological, and psychological ages. An educational course called "Functional Ageing" was created for life science students at the National University of Singapore (NUS) during the academic year 2016-2017. The module adopted an interdisciplinary approach based on science-technology-society (STS) methodology and aimed to equip students with the analytical tools needed to assess the ageing process at both the molecular and physiological/functional levels. Ultimately, the module aimed to promote the understanding of ageing processes, particularly functional ageing in a population and its societal impacts. MethodsThis "Functional Ageing" course spanned over 13 weeks, consisting of weekly four-hour sessions that aimed to integrate both biology of ageing and societal perceptions of an ageing population. The first half of the semester covered the molecular processes that govern ageing, while the second half focussed on societal perception, burden of disease, healthy ageing interventions and creating an ageless society. Experimental and epidemiological studies were used to explain the ageing process. Expert guest lecturers were invited throughout the module to share their experiences on the demanding research areas of ageing today, as well as clinical aspects of age-related diseases. In addition, a field visit to a geriatric ward at the mental health organisation was arranged to showcase the countrys approach to dealing with the rising demands of ageing, and to provide experiential learning that can help inculcate a clearer public perception of ageing. ResultsThis 13-week module helped to improve students perception about functional ageing in todays society. After the module, a reflection analysis was conducted to evaluate students perceptions of ageing society. Overall findings garnered have demonstrated that while students generally have a brief understanding of the biological processes of ageing, their perception on how ageing is being manifested in a public health and societal setting is in paucity. However, the routine university-directed feedback survey indicated that the module had a positive impact on students appreciation and comprehension of the interplay between biological and sociological aspects of ageing, thus achieving the learning objectives of the module. ConclusionThe aim of the "Functional ageing" module was to integrate the biology and sociology of ageing to provide a better interdisciplinary understanding of ageing in society. After completing the module, students demonstrated a change in their mindset and attitude towards how their scientific understanding of ageing can be coupled to their public perception of ageing. As ageing populations become more prevalent in many societies, it is crucial that we prepare for an ageing population and develop a positive perception of ageing. Through educational efforts like this course/module, students will exhibit greater awareness of ageing issues, leading to more informed and balanced perceptions.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2023

Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time

We evaluated how the gender composition of top-cited authors within different subfields of research has evolved over time. We considered 9,071,122 authors with at least 5 full papers in Scopus as of September 1, 2022. Using a previously validated composite citation indicator, we identified the 2% top-cited authors for each of 174 science subfields (Science-Metrix classification) in 4 separate publication age cohorts (first publication pre-1992, 1992-2001, 2002-2011, post-2011). Using NamSor we assigned 3,784,507 authors as men, and 2,011,616 as women (for 36.1% gender assignment uncertain). Men outnumbered women 1.88-fold among all authors, decreasing from 3.93-fold to 1.36-fold over time. Men outnumbered women 3.21-fold among top-cited authors, decreasing from 6.41-fold to 2.28-fold over time. In the youngest (post-2011) cohort, 32/174 (18%) subfields had >=50% women, 97/174 (56%) subfields had >=30% women, and 3 subfields had =<10% women among the top-cited authors. Gender imbalances in author numbers decreased sharply over time in both high-income countries (including the USA) and other countries, but the latter had little improvement in gender imbalances for top-cited authors. In random samples of 100 women and 100 men from the youngest (post-2011) cohort, in-depth assessment showed that most were currently (April 2023) working in academic environments. 32 women and 44 men had some faculty appointment, but only 2 women and 2 men were full professors. Our analysis shows large heterogeneity across scientific disciplines in the amelioration of gender imbalances with more prominent imbalances persisting among top-cited authors and slow promotion pathways even for the most-cited young scientists.

scientific communication and education↗