Uncertain Precision: Neurobiological and Physiological Correlates of Conservative Confidence Bias

Abstract

Correctly estimating the influence of uncertainty on our decisions is a critical metacognitive faculty. However, the relationship between sensory uncertainty (or its inverse, precision), decision accuracy, and subjective confidence is currently unclear. Although some findings indicate that healthy adults exhibit an illusion of over-confidence, under-confidence in response to sensory uncertainty has also been reported. One reason for this ambiguity is that stimulus intensity and precision are typically confounded with one another, limiting the ability to assess their independent contribution to metacognitive biases. Here we report four psychophysical experiments controlling these factors, finding that healthy human participants are systematically under-confident when discriminating low-precision stimuli. This bias remains even when decision accuracy and reaction time are accounted for, indicating that a performance-independent computation partially underpins the influence of sensory precision on confidence. We further show that this influence is linked to fluctuations in arousal and individual differences in the neuroanatomy of the left superior parietal lobe and middle insula. These results illuminate the neural and physiological correlates of precision misperception in metacognition. Significance StatementThe ability to recognize the influence of sensory uncertainty on our decisions underpins the veracity of self-monitoring, or metacognition. In the extreme, a systematic confidence bias can undermine decision accuracy and potentially underpin disordered self-insight in neuropsychiatric illness. Previously it was unclear if metacognition accurately reflects changes in sensory precision, in part due to confounding effects of stimulus intensity and precision. Here we overcome these limitations to repeatedly demonstrate a robust precision-related confidence bias. Further, we reveal novel neuroanatomical and physiological markers underlying this metacognitive bias. These results suggest a unique state-based computational mechanism may drive subjective confidence biases and further provide new avenues for investigating maladaptive awareness of uncertainty in neuropsychiatric disorders.