Memory B cells and memory T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination or infection show different dynamics and efficacy to the Omicron variant.

Abstract

Although BNT162b2 vaccination was shown to prevent infection and reduce COVID-19 severity, and the persistence of immunological memory generated by the vaccination has not been well elucidated. We evaluated memory B and T cell responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein before and after the third BNT162b2 booster. Although the antibody titer against the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) decreased significantly 8 months after the second vaccination, the number of memory B cells continued to increase, while the number of memory T cells decreased slowly. Memory B and T cells from unvaccinated infected patients showed similar kinetics. After the third vaccination, the antibody titer increased to the level of the second vaccination, and memory B cells increased at significantly higher levels before the booster, while memory T cells recovered close to the second vaccination levels. In memory T cells, the frequency of CXCR5+CXCR3+CCR6- cTfh1 was positively correlated with RBD-specific antibody-secreting B cells. Furthermore, T cell-dependent antibody production from reactivated memory B cells in vitro was correlated to the Tfh-like cytokine levels. For the response to variant RBDs, although 60%-80% of memory B cells could bind to the Omicron RBD, their binding affinity was low, while memory T cells show an equal response to the Omicron spike. Thus, the persistent presence of memory B and T cells will quickly upregulate antibody production and T cell responses after Omicron strain infection, which prevents severe illness and death due to COVID-19.