bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.06.28.497925

A novel approach to quantifying inter-individual distance in insects

Abstract

1Behaviour involving two or more individuals within the same species is known as social behaviour. Sexual dimorphisms and environmental cues as well as age, experience and social hierarchy shape social behaviour. The study of this complex behaviour, however, has one essential boundary condition: the distance between individuals. Because social signals (e.g. acoustic, visual or olfactory) have limited reach the inter-individual distance is crucial for the correct transmission of such signals. In this study we present a newly developed assay to study group behaviour and inter-individual distance in Drosophila melanogaster. This assay consists of a circular observation space flanked by two automatic release devices that allow flies to enter individually. By releasing the flies one at a time, the observer can study different features of (intra-)group behaviour with different group compositions. Importantly, the observer can control (manually or through automatisation) the increase of group size over time. Over the last decades insects became more relevant as convenient model organisms to study the neurophysiological and genetic basis of (human) neuro-developmental disorders. Drosophila models are used to study the genetic and neuronal underpinnings of a wide range of neurological disorders. In some cases the studies revealed alterations in social behaviour consistent with descriptions of behavioural symptoms in human disorders. Social behaviours in Drosophila are well-studied and include courtship, mating, aggression and group interactions. This setup will facilitate the analysis of these aspects of group interactions in Drosophila, allowing for a deeper understanding of the neuronal circuits and genetic factors involved in those behaviours. 2 Contribution to the fieldSocial behaviour pertains to the most sophisticated behavioural feats, as it involves multiple, interacting individuals. These complex interactions often conceal the underlying neuronal and ethological mechanisms. One of the most basal ethological mechanisms is the inter-individual distance, which resembles a perimeter in which each individual needs to formulate a response to the approach of others. We introduce a device that allows to test the inter-individual distance under consistent circumstances, by automating the entry time and direction of conspecifics into the arena. We can further observe the composition, dynamics and forming of larger animal groups as well as their separating. We can also observe how the individual distances alter during the process. Also other behaviours can be easily observed, e.g. aggression, courtship, homosexual courtship, etc. We successfully employed this approach in [1] and could discriminate the role of different neuroligins in social behaviour. We provide a detailed description including building plans and material lists for this social observation device. The system can be run in an automatic mode to ensure the consistency of experiments or in a manual mode to test animals under more flexible social situations. We provide multiple back lighting systems to test animals in the dark (infra-red LEDs) or in illuminated environments (vis. range LEDs). The system is fully automated and can be linked with a number of animal trackers (e.g. T-Rex, deeplabcut, LACE, etc.) via simple videography. We hope that our experimental setup augments the variety of behaviours testable in ethological setups (T-maze, water-mazes, operant conditing setups, etc) with social interaction and group formation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Corthals, K., Hueper, L., Neumann, S., Heinrich, R., Gras, H., Geurten, B. R. H.. 2022-07-02. A novel approach to quantifying inter-individual distance in insects. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.28.497925

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict

The costs and benefits of sociality depend in part upon the size of groups. Therefore, individual behavior should vary across groups of different sizes, reflecting group size-dependent costs and benefits. Here, we test this prediction using a long-term dataset on wild female baboons (Papio cynocephalus x P. anubis). We find that individuals who live in larger groups suffer social costs: compared to animals in smaller groups, they experience more agonistic interactions, fewer grooming interactions, and sparser social networks. These social costs arise, in part, from a pattern in which relationships within dyads become more agonistic as group size increases (i.e., a given dyad exhibits fewer grooming interactions relative to agonistic interactions when it is living in a larger group). While individuals in large groups generally maintain the same number of strong bonds as individuals in small groups, they tend to develop weak bonds with a greater number of social partners that results in, on average, weaker bonds overall. Our results demonstrate that, despite potential benefits to large groups in terms of predation risk and intergroup competition, the social lives of individuals in larger groups involve less affiliation and more conflict in this wild primate population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗