bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.06.07.494963
Wilcoxon rank-sum test still outperforms dearseq after accounting for the normalization impact in semi-synthetic RNA-seq data simulation
Abstract
In this response to the correspondence by Hejblum et al. [1], we clarify the reasons why we ran the Wilcoxon rank-sum test on the semi-synthetic RNA-seq samples without normalization, and why we could only run dearseq with its built-in normalization, in our published study [2]. We also argue that no normalization should be performed on the semi-synthetic samples. Hence, for a fairer method comparison and using the updated dearseq package by Hejblum et al., we re-run the six differential expression methods (DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom, dearseq, NOISeq, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test) without normalizing the semi-synthetic samples, i.e., under the "No normalization" scheme in [1]. Our updated results show that the Wilcoxon rank-sum test is still the best method in terms of false discovery rate (FDR) control and power performance under all settings investigated.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Li, Y., Ge, X. J., Peng, F., Li, W., Li, J. J.. 2022-06-09. Wilcoxon rank-sum test still outperforms dearseq after accounting for the normalization impact in semi-synthetic RNA-seq data simulation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.07.494963
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.