Long-term memory in frog-eating bats

Abstract

Long-term memory has clear advantages but also has neurological and behavioral costs1-3. Given these opposing selection pressures, understanding how long memories last can shed light on how memory enhances or constrains animals abilities to exploit their niches. Although testing memory retention in wild animals is difficult, it is important because captive conditions do not reflect the complex cognitive demands of wild environments, and long-term captivity changes the brain4 (past studies on nonhuman long-term memory are reviewed in Table S1). Here, we trained wild-caught frog-eating bats (Trachops cirrhosus) to find prey by flying to a novel acoustic cue, released them back into the wild, and then re-captured some of them 1-4 years later. When re-tested, all eight experienced bats that previously learned the novel prey sounds flew to those sounds within seconds, whereas 17 naive bats tested with the same sounds showed weak responses. Experienced bats also showed behavior indicating generalization of memories between novel sounds and rewards over time. The frog-eating bats remarkably long memory for novel acoustic cues indicates that an ability to remember rarely encountered prey may be advantageous for this predator, and suggests hitherto unknown cognitive abilities in bats. O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15a8294org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@132eb3forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f29583org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@135dff2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19cfa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable S1:C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONStudies of animal memory durations documenting memories of months or years. Memory duration = the longest duration demonstrated in the study. Wild or captive = where animals spent the time of memory retention; some "captive" animals were originally wild caught. Context = the ecological context and memory task being tested. 2-AFC = Two-alternative forced choice. C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL