bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.03.15.484421

Structural basis of Omicron immune evasion: A comparative computational study of Spike protein-Antibody interaction.

Contractor, D.·Globisch, C.·Swaroop, S.·Jain, A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused more than 424 million infections and 5.9 million deaths so far. The vaccines used against SARS-COV-2 by now have been able to develop some neutralising antibodies in the vaccinated human population and slow down the infection rate. The effectiveness of the vaccines has been challenged by the emergence of the new strains with numerous mutations in the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. Since S protein is the major immunogenic protein of the virus and also contains Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) that interacts with the human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, any mutations in this region should affect the neutralisation potential of the antibodies leading to the immune evasion. Several variants of concern (VOC) of the virus have emerged so far. Among them, the most critical are Delta (B.1.617.2), and recently reported Omicron (B. 1.1.529) which have acquired a lot of mutations in the spike protein. We have mapped those mutations on the modelled RBD and evaluated the binding affinities of various human antibodies with it. Docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies have been used to explore the effect of the mutations on the structure of the RBD and the RBD-antibody interaction. The analysis shows that the mutations mostly at the interface of a nearby region lower the binding affinity of the antibody by ten to forty per cent, with a downfall in the number of interactions formed as a whole and therefore, it implies the generation of immune escape variants. Notable mutations and their effect was characterised by performing various analyses that explain the structural basis of antibody efficacy in Delta and a compromised neutralisation effect for the Omicron variant. Our results pave the way for robust vaccine design that can be effective for many variants. Graphical Abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY SynopsisThe research study utilises comparative docking and MD simulations analyses to illustrate how mutations in delta and omicron variants affect the binding of antibodies to the spike receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS CoV-2.

Explore related subjects

biophysicsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Contractor, D., Globisch, C., Swaroop, S., Jain, A.. 2022-03-15. Structural basis of Omicron immune evasion: A comparative computational study of Spike protein-Antibody interaction.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.484421

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Learning inhibitor interactions from protein deep mutational scanning data and deep learning models

Recent advances in protein language models, geometric deep learning, and structure prediction frameworks have the potential to accelerate computational drug discovery. However, it remains unclear how well these methods generalize beyond their training sets. Mutation-dependent drug responses present a challenge to these methods because there are often large effects from relatively small perturbations. Here, we systematically benchmark diverse mutational effect and drug-target affinity prediction models using deep mutational scanning datasets spanning 11 inhibitor conditions for the MET kinase domain. Across both mutational effect prediction and drug-target affinity tasks, current AI models produce largely ligand-invariant predictions despite experimentally distinct inhibitor-dependent fitness landscapes. Ligand-aware geometric models, including LigandMPNN and LASErMPNN, partially recover experimentally validated resistance-associated hotspots, highlighting the importance of explicitly modeling protein-ligand interactions and local structural flexibility. In contrast, deep learning affinity prediction models underestimate mutation-induced changes in binding affinity. This deficiency likely reflects mutation-invariant structural priors derived from co-folded structure prediction frameworks and the absence of mutation-conditioned supervision in current affinity datasets. Finally, we further extended our analysis to several kinase-inhibitor deep mutational scanning datasets and confirm the overall trends. Our findings suggest that a primary limitation in improving performance on this task lies in the scarcity of mutation-conditioned protein-ligand training data rather than model architecture alone.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

Scalable Contact-Gated Stochastic Operators and Universal Reduction Laws for Macromolecular Protein Dynamics, Allostery, and Kinetics

Constructing continuous, thermodynamically reversible reduced equations of motion from atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) that scale from fast-folding miniproteins to multi-domain allosteric enzymes in explicit water remains a foundational problem in computational biophysics. Across 15 molecular systems (890,000 SHA-256-verified frames, 0.89 us cumulative sampling) spanning 13 structurally diverse proteins from Chignolin (d=18) to explicit-solvent Adenylate Kinase (d=426, 40,110 particles) and Maltose-Binding Protein (d=738, 49,215 particles), plus two analytical verification peptides (d=2, 4), we formulate a contact-gated, GENERIC-regularized stochastic operator on the backbone torus T^d. We show that collective slow modes compress sub-linearly across two orders of magnitude in chain length - with spectral participation ratio scaling as PR(d)=1.061 d^0.494 (95% CI [0.332, 0.666], Delta AICc=-18.15) and short-time diffusion rank as r_D^90(d)=0.799 d^0.930 (Delta AICc=-14.39) - whereas cumulative 90% equilibrium variance in large native-basin enzymes transitions to extensive proportionality (10.0% blind extrapolation error vs. 35.7% for small-protein power laws). Consequently, macromolecular tractability above d>200 requires off-diagonal sparsity rather than global PCA truncation alone: universal peptide-plane crankshaft anti-correlation (mean R(psi_i, phi_i+1)=-0.603 +/- 0.054) and sparse 3D tertiary contact gating (mean k_eff=5.97, reaching 99.3% sparsity at d=738) enable a sparse directed acyclic contact-graph Cholesky estimator scaling empirically as O(d^0.92) in time and O(d^1.06) in memory (65.8x memory compression, 99.6x faster than Graphical LASSO, and higher blind held-out log-likelihood +0.303/d vs. dense +0.205/d on MBP). Biophysically, relative solvent-accessible surface area (rSASA_i) unifies dry linear equipartition in protein cores (alpha_core=1.00, 12.33% blind thermal error) with viscosity-coupled loops (alpha_loop=1.28) and peptides (alpha_peptide=1.57); parameter-free kinematic projection reproduces solution NMR Lipari-Szabo S^2 order parameters (mean r_s=+0.483 across four BMRB enzymes, Ubiquitin Pearson r=+0.921) and X-ray B-factors (mean r_s=+0.276); and 13-fold zero-shot Leave-One-Protein-Out transfer predicts unseen protein operators directly from static PDB coordinates (r_s=+0.706, R^2=+0.359 ridge; r_s=+0.721, R^2=+0.410 GBDT). Applied to functional discovery, explicit-solvent apo toroidal operators localize mechanical domain-closure hinges in AdK (PR-AUC=0.348) and MBP (AUROC=0.690 vs. 0.446 ANM), resolve distal Met20 <-> FG catalytic loop coupling in E. coli DHFR (71.6% recovery at 93.2% sparsity) and beta1-beta2 <-> Ile44 routing in Ubiquitin (7.1x amplification) on blind trajectories, and quantify sub-diffusive Mori-Zwanzig reaction-coordinate memory (mean gamma_M=0.593 +/- 0.126). A validation-tuned head-to-head benchmark against Markov State Models, TICA, Smoluchowski diffusion, Elastic Network Models, and unconstrained SDEs across all 13 proteins maps the physical regimes where continuous contact-gated GENERIC operators (lowest Frobenius error 0.288, exact 0.000 spurious entropy vs. median 65.79 kB/ns/d, IQR 53.76-104.66, mean 346.17) and discrete or harmonic baselines each excel.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

FoxO1 and HNF1α cooperatively remodel nucleosome architecture and mechanical stability to activate transcription

How different transcription factors (TFs) cooperate to bind nucleosomal DNA targets remains unclear. Cryo-EM and force spectroscopy show that the pioneer factor FoxO1 binds superhelical location (SHL) +2 of nucleosomes assembled on the human IGFBP1 promoter, enhances distal DNA unwrapping, destabilizes the histone core, and reduces nucleosome mechanical stability. TF HNF1 binds SHL +5/+7 as a dimer, induces extensive DNA unwrapping without perturbing the histone core, and reshapes nucleosome disassembly dynamics. FoxO1 enhances HNF1 recruitment, and together they stabilize the nucleosome during its mechanically-induced disassembly trajectories. In-cell nucleosome footprinting on active promoters shows that FoxO1 binding enhances unwrapped nucleosomes and subnucleosomes presence, while HNF1 increases stabilized and breathing nucleosomes and reduces the subnucleosome population. Combined, they display an intermediate nucleosome phenotype. Our data leads to a model where FoxO1 destabilizes the nucleosome and enhances HNF1 recruitment, and together they remodel nucleosome architecture both in vitro and in native chromatin.

biophysics↗