bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.03.10.483778

Protein Language Model Performs Efficient Homology Detection

Abstract

MotivationThere are now 225 million sequences in the UniProtKB database, as of January 2022 and 451 million protein sequences in the NCBI non-redundant database. This huge sequence data is ripe for analysis and can be extremely informative about biological function when analyzed with the appropriate methods. Evolutionary information such as the relationship among protein sequences is key to performing sequence analyses. Since sequence matching is one of the primary ways that annotations are found, higher-quality sequence matches yield a larger number of identified homologs. Thus, there is an essential need for a faster and more accurate homolog detection method to process the huge amount of rapidly growing biological sequences. MethodRecently, we have seen major improvements in various predictive computational tasks such as structure prediction from the ever-improving artificial intelligence methods. One such approach has been to use language models to represent proteins numerically in a representation matrix (embeddings) while retaining context-dependent biochemical, biophysical, and evolutionary information. Computational transformer architectures that utilize attention neural networks can generate these context-aware numerical representations in an unsupervised fashion. One such use for these protein embeddings is remote homolog detection. In this work, we utilize protein language models and then apply discrete cosine transforms to extract the essential part of these embeddings, resulting in a significantly smaller fixed-size matrix for each sequence. This allows us to numerically and efficiently calculate the distance between all pairs of proteins resulting in homolog detection. ResultsOur Protein LAnguage model Search Tool (PLAST) is significantly faster, with linear runtimes in the number of sequences within the query database. With only one CPU core, it can scan a million sequences in less than a second. It essentially removes the noise in the sequence data and leads to significant improvements. PLAST is more accurate in the benchmarks tested from the PFAM, SCOP, and CATH databases than other approaches. When benchmarked with the PFAM database, the increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 3.1% when compared with NCBI-BLAST. The number of remote homologs that are detectable now is significantly larger and pushes sequence matches deeply into the usual twilight zone. Compared with the state-of-the-art profile-based homology search tools like CSBLAST, the increase was still 2.0%. PLAST can find remote homologs for a significant number of proteins that had been thought to be unique due to homolog detection failure. These homologs that are found usually have less than 20% sequence identity making them indistinguishable from noise with most other sequence matching methods. ConclusionPLAST is an accurate and fast homolog detection tool essential for easy and rapid progress to utilize the vast amount of data generated by next-generation sequencing methods. Quantization of sequence embeddings into highly-compressed noise-free representations with the use of direct cosine transforms allows for the efficient and accurate detection of normal homologs and remote ones that are un-detectable by other sequence similarity methods. The PLAST web server is accessible from https://mesihk.github.io/plast.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kilinc, M., Jia, K., Jernigan, R. L.. 2022-03-13. Protein Language Model Performs Efficient Homology Detection. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Deducing splicing events from transcript sets with splicelogic

Long-read RNA sequencing captures a greater proportion of full-length transcripts, enabling more accurate isoform identification, discovery of novel isoforms, and more precise differential transcript usage analysis. However, comparing transcripts, whether between conditions or between sets such as novel and annotated isoforms, yields complex isoform changes that are hard to manipulate, summarize, and visualize. This is compounded by vertical integration of some tools, where downstream analysis depends on the specific output of a particular upstream tool. To address this gap, we have developed splicelogic, an R/Bioconductor package that makes transcript-set comparisons biologically interpretable by turning them into discrete splicing events, such as exon skipping, alternative splice sites, intron retention, and alternative transcription start and end sites. We designed splicelogic to integrate easily with existing RNA-seq workflows and tools. The splicelogic functions are modular, readable, and extensible, making it easy for users to adapt core logic to their own custom scientific questions or novel splicing definitions. By obtaining interpretable splicing events from transcript changes, splicelogic enables downstream analyses, including annotation of RNA-binding protein recognition sites, alongside summary statistics and visualization. The splicelogic package is publicly available and distributed through Bioconductor.

bioinformatics↗

Contrastive Learning Improves Generalization on M2OR Olfactory Binding Dataset

Olfaction-based biosensors stand to have profound impacts in fields such as medical diagnostics, national security, and drug discovery. A promising mode of vapor phase biodetection mimics volatile organic compound-olfactory receptor (VOC-OR) interactions with target-specific protein or peptide probes; however, lack of experimental coverage remains a core bottleneck. Current computational approaches aim to improve prediction of VOC-OR binding to reduce experimental burden, and current machine learning approaches fail to demonstrate a level of generalization that addresses current engineering challenges. Here, using the Molecular to Olfactory Dataset (M2OR) and Insect Olfactory Binding Protein Database (iOBPdb) datasets, data partitioning methods and their performance are evaluated on a neural network and contrastive learning framework on such VOC-OR binding datasets, varying: model training, architecture, and structure of the input data distribution. It was found that holding out certain chemical or proteomic motifs from the training data diminished model performance with a two layer neural network model. The model was able to generalize to state of the art performance (0.88 AUCROC) on every data split by applying a contrastive learning objective defined by shared molecular constituents and a stochastic sampler. This suggests the contrastive objective provides a strong inductive bias for neural networks to predict novel VOC-OR pairs. These findings highlight that model performance on pairwise biological interaction datasets can be inflated through identity leakage from constituent overlap, and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation protocols. Furthermore, we show contrastive regularization mitigates dataset degeneracy through enforcement of compatibility in the models latent geometry that may extend to other binder target-datasets where identity leakage confounds evaluation.

bioinformatics↗

Plate design confounds donor variation and model evaluation in single-cell perturbation screens

Single-cell screens of immune cells from many donors are used to study why individuals respond differently and to benchmark response models. Each donor-perturbation combination typically occupies one well, controls are grouped, and donors share one layout, so technical effects can look biological. Using a 90-cytokine screen, two compound screens, four cohorts and simulations, we show that well effects explain most replicate-control variation in abundant cell types, controls carry a shared offset, and identical control wells differ by hundreds of differentially expressed genes at a standard threshold, about as many as two receptor-negative proteins do. Negative controls, design-aware estimators and perturbation-specific evaluation change the interpretation of four recent analyses. A deep-learning model that scores below a perturbation-agnostic predictor under standard evaluation outperforms a simple baseline on perturbation-specific differences in two of three cell types (significantly in one with stricter controls), but predicts less well the component shared with inert wells.

bioinformatics↗