bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.03.10.483502

DNA Double Strand Breaks cause chromosome loss through sister chromatid tethering in human embryos

Abstract

Summary paragraphGenome editing by DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is currently being investigated as a tool to treat or even prevent heritable diseases1. However, DNA repair mechanisms in the human embryo remain poorly understood and DSBs may result in chromosome loss 2,3. Here we provide evidence of whole and segmental chromosome loss in over one third of chromosomes 16, 17 and X targeted by CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA DSB, including pericentromeric and mid-arm sites. Chromosomal changes were asymmetric relative to the Cas9 cut site: segmental losses occurred on both centric as well as acentric chromosome arms, while gains were exclusively found on acentric arms, suggesting that centromeres in broken chromosomes continued to mediate sister chromatid separation. Using this pattern of chromosomal errors, we were able to define new genomic coordinates of the active centromere on chromosome 16. Asymmetry was also found in the attrition of gDNA at the break site: attrition occurred centromeric of the DSB, while telomeric to the break, chromosomal ends were protected. Thus, spindle forces at centromeres and end tethering and protection at DSBs are antagonistic forces that interfere with accurate segregation of sister chromatids. Thereby, a single DSB is sufficient to result in the loss of a chromosome from the embryo. These results highlight the risks of aneuploidy in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, while also providing a mechanism for mitotically acquired aneuploidy caused by DNA breaks in human embryos.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Turocy, J., Marin, D., Xu, S., Xu, J., Robles, A., Treff, N., Egli, D.. 2022-03-10. DNA Double Strand Breaks cause chromosome loss through sister chromatid tethering in human embryos. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483502

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Alveolar and airway progenitors converge on an epigenetically encoded profibrotic state

During organ regeneration, epithelial transitional states arise from progenitors and instruct the mesenchyme to remodel the extracellular matrix. However, the identity of the progenitors, the mechanisms underlying this transition, and why these states persist in tissue fibrosis often remain elusive. Here, using lineage tracing in mice, we show that the profibrotic KRT5-/KRT17+ state in pulmonary fibrosis arises convergently from alveolar type (AT) 2 and airway secretory cells. AT1 cells generate neither KRT5-/KRT17+ nor AT2 cells. TGF-{beta}/SMAD3 acts through KMT2A and p300 to epigenetically reprogram human AT2 cells into the KRT5-/KRT17+ state. In human pulmonary fibrosis, KRT5-/KRT17+ cells slough off, and transitional cells re-epithelialize the denuded basement membrane. Transcriptionally convergent states arise in injured kidney, skin, and intestine. This work reframes fibrogenesis as the accumulation of a conserved profibrotic transitional state via ongoing turnover, not persistence alone, and nominates the state transition and its epigenetic regulators as therapeutic targets.

developmental biology↗

Dynamic mechanical sorting biases niche occupancy and lineage outcome during development of bilayered glandular epithelia

Tissue compartmentalization into basal and luminal domains is a hallmark of glandular epithelia, yet how fate boundaries are established and stabilized during dynamic morphogenesis remains a major unresolved question. Here, using mouse embryonic explants, organoids, quantitative live imaging and genetic perturbations, we show that basal-luminal compartmentalization is not maintained by fixed boundaries, but through continuous positional corrections. We show that differences in cellular adhesion and actomyosin contractility drive these positional corrections by promoting active cell sorting. We further find that these mechanical differences influence lineage specification by controlling cell positioning rather than directly instructing cell fate. Before commitment, mosaic, but not uniform, perturbation of cell mechanics alters niche occupancy and biases lineage outcome, indicating that relative mechanical properties determine access to fate-instructive niches. Conversely, perturbation of Notch and YAP remodels compartment-specific mechanical properties and cell-positioning dynamics, revealing a reciprocal coupling between lineage state and mechanical sorting. Conservation of this mechanism across four glandular epithelia of distinct origins and functions identifies dynamic mechanical sorting as a general strategy for maintaining robust tissue compartmentalization during the extensive growth and cellular rearrangements of branching morphogenesis.

developmental biology↗

Unbiased lineage tracing across the adipose organ decouples developmental origin from anatomical and transcriptomic identities

The developmental origins of individual adipose depots and whether embryonic lineage dictates adult function remain unresolved. Here, we apply in utero CRISPR-mediated barcoding lineage tracing to construct the first unbiased clonal map of adipose organ development in mice. The developmental hierarchy we uncover challenges several conventions. Remarkably, interscapular brown fat, used as the prototypical brown fat, is the most developmentally isolated brown fat; depots sharing Myf5/Pax3 lineage markers fail to cluster together; mesenteric white fat shares unexpected high clonal ancestry with brown fats despite a radically divergent transcriptome; and subcutaneous white adipose tissues converge transcriptomically despite distant developmental origins. These findings call for a reinterpretation of single-marker lineage tracing data across the adipose organ and propose that adipose depot identity is not solely encoded by embryonic lineage but is substantially shaped by the anatomical niche.

developmental biology↗