Parasite and pathogen prevalence in our closest animal companions is determined by accessibility of sanitation services

Chalkowski, K.; Lepczyk, C. A.; Wilson, A. E.; Valenta, K.; Sipley, B.; Brownlee, J.; Morgan, A. M.; Santos, S. R.; Willoughby, J. R.; Zohdy, S.

doi:10.1101/2022.03.08.483406

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.03.08.483406

Parasite and pathogen prevalence in our closest animal companions is determined by accessibility of sanitation services

Chalkowski, K.·Lepczyk, C. A.·Wilson, A. E.·Valenta, K.·Sipley, B.·Brownlee, J.·Morgan, A. M.·Santos, S. R.·Willoughby, J. R.·Zohdy, S.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Despite the critical role parasites play in ecosystem functioning and their considerable influence on human society, little is known about their variations in abundance on a global scale. This gap in knowledge is amplified by a lack of holistic understanding on how the abundance of parasites of wildlife and humans varies across environmental and socioeconomic gradients, despite a need to integrate study of parasites across social and environmental spheres. Free-roaming companion animals (e.g., domestic cats (Felis catus) and dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)) share pathogens and have frequent contact with humans and wildlife. Thus, they are an effective model to understand how parasite and pathogen prevalence of humans and wildlife varies across environmental and socioeconomic gradients. Through a global systematic review and analysis of socioeconomic and environmental variables, including per capita GDP, income disparity, sanitation, biodiversity, island habitation, and latitude, we find that sanitation and island habitation best explained free-roaming companion animal parasite and pathogen prevalence. Sanitation was significantly associated with parasite and pathogen prevalence in free-roaming companion animals, such that for every 10% increase in the proportion of the human population with improved sanitation access, parasite and pathogen prevalence in free-roaming companion animals decreased by 12% (5-19%, 95% C.L.; p = 0.0023). Since companion animals share many parasites with humans and wildlife, these results suggest that actionable interventions to improve sanitation access could reduce parasite and pathogen exposure risks from companion animals to humans and wildlife. Significance StatementIn addition to playing a critical role in ecosystem functioning, parasites also influence human health, behavior, and society. Further, parasites are also impacted by human activities, as much as by ecological phenomena in natural environments. Despite these dualities, little is known about their variations in abundance on a global scale across environmental and socioeconomic gradients. Using free-roaming companion animals (e.g., domestic cats (Felis catus) and dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)) as a model system, we find that access to safely managed sanitation services is strongly associated with parasite and pathogen prevalence. This finding underscores improvements to sanitation as an actionable One Health intervention that could reduce parasite and pathogen exposure risks from companion animals to humans and wildlife.

Explore related subjects

ecology Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Chalkowski, K., Lepczyk, C. A., Wilson, A. E., Valenta, K., Sipley, B., Brownlee, J., Morgan, A. M., Santos, S. R., Willoughby, J. R., Zohdy, S.. 2022-03-08. Parasite and pathogen prevalence in our closest animal companions is determined by accessibility of sanitation services. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.08.483406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗