bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.03.07.483400

Differential correlation across subpopulations of single cells in subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia

McGee, R. L.·Behbehani, G. K.·Coombes, K. R.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mass cytometers can record 40-50 parameters per single cell for millions of cells in a sample, and in particular, for leukemic cells. Many methods have been developed to cluster phenotypically similar cells within cytometry data, but there are fewer methods to visualize activity and interactions of pairs of proteins across these populations. We have developed a workflow for analyzing correlations associated with predfined populations. By clustering blood samples from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and normal controls using an established algorithm, we obtained a minimum spanning tree of clusters of single cells. Using surface marker expression, we identified clusters on the tree that belonged to phenotypes of interest. Next, we computed correlations between pairs of proteins in each cluster. We developed a novel, coherent, probability-based statistic to test differences between vectors of correlation coefficients. By comparing all combinations of the normal controls under the statistic, we created an empirical distribution that provided a conservative measure of differential correlation. Using this empirically-derived distribution to define significance, we compared pooled samples from AML subtypes and normal controls to detect differential correlations. Given the structure present within this cytometry data set, we found it natural to consider correlations in this manner versus aggregating all data and computing a single correlation. Our results have the advantage that we can localize the statistical measure to determine contributions from particular phenotypic populations. Differentially correlated pairs of proteins can be further explored by considering a populations distribution of correlation coefficients or biaxially plotting protein expressions within individual cells in a given population. Our approach leads to a better understanding of the nonlinear relationships that exist in the cytometry data. Author summaryWe introduce a novel method for analyzing the abundance of single cell data collected by high-throughput technologies. Due to the high dimensionality of such datasets, there is a need for methods to identify significant interactions between genes or proteins. In particular, we are interested in statistical differences between correlations of proteins within populations of cells determined by traditional immunophenotyping techniques. In this paper, we have demonstrated the utility of this new framework in the case of blood samples from individuals with different subtypes of leukemia and compare to healthy controls. The motivation for this application is that differences between can illuminate potential drivers of the disease. We have illustrated an example of how intracellular events can be detected by our statistic. Finally, this method is flexible in that it can also be applied in a variety of contexts where there are vectors of correlation coefficients that need to be compared.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

McGee, R. L., Behbehani, G. K., Coombes, K. R.. 2022-03-08. Differential correlation across subpopulations of single cells in subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.07.483400

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗