bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.01.31.478501

Increased academic performance and prolonged career duration among Taiwanese academic faculty in ecology and evolutionary biology

Abstract

Academic job markets have become increasingly challenging worldwide, yet it remains poorly characterized how competitively-successful candidates should be and what the underlying determinants of their success are. Focusing on the field of ecology and evolutionary biology, we analyzed the academic performance (measured as h-index) as well as the duration before recruitment as a new faculty member and promotion to full professor of 145 principal investigators (PI) over the past 34 years in Taiwan. We found that PIs had higher performance and longer duration before recruitment more recently. Performance before promotion remained stable, whereas the duration increased over time. The origin and prestige of doctorate had no effect on the performance or duration either before recruitment or before promotion. We also found that the difference in performance before and after recruitment ("After" performance -- "Before" performance) decreased in recent years, with PIs recruited in earlier years maintaining their performance after recruitment while those recruited in later years exhibiting a performance drop. While PIs performed equally well before and after recruitment irrespective of doctorate origin, those with domestic PhD degrees showed a decrease in performance after promotion compared to their counterparts with foreign degrees. Taken together, our findings reveal a prolonged career duration for researchers as a result of intensifying competition in academia, and highlight the increasingly crucial role of academic performance, rather than PhD degree itself, in determining academic success.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hsu, G.-C., Lin, W.-J., Sun, S.-J.. 2022-02-02. Increased academic performance and prolonged career duration among Taiwanese academic faculty in ecology and evolutionary biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.31.478501

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Public perceptions, knowledge and factors associated with the acceptability of genetically modified foods in Kampala city, Uganda

Food is a basic human need important for the survival of all human beings. The rapidly growing world population puts pressure on food sources, inviting the need to devise mechanisms to sustain it. Biotechnology has developed important measures for improving plants and livestock as a remedy for food security with aim to achieve the Sustainable Development goal two (2). Globally, the adoption and use of genetically modified foods (GMFs) has been controversial as it is in Uganda today due to concerns related to the risk uncertainties. This study was therefore conducted to assess the public perceptions, knowledge and factors that influence the acceptability of genetically modified foods in Kampala City. This was a cross sectional quantitative study that involved one hundred and ninety-eight participants. The data were collected using a survey tool and summarized using descriptive and linear regression analysis. The findings of this study showed that almost two-thirds of participants (129/198, 65%) had some basic knowledge on genetically modified foods. About 45.3% (90/198) of the participants perceived genetically modified foods as being unsafe for human consumption. Eighty-eight participants (44.3%) perceived them as being associated with major human health and environmental safety concerns. The acceptability of these foods was significantly associated with gender, education level, nutritional value and health effects. Female participants were more likely to accept genetically modified foods (OR.4.84 95% CI: 1.37 - 7.68). Those who perceived genetically modified foods as being of high nutrition value were more likely to accept them (OR. 3.07, 95% CI: 1.27 - 7.37). The public is predominantly aware of genetical modified foods since a big proportion had basic knowledge about them although with a lot of misinformation. People with a higher education level had positive perceptions on the use of these foods hence a need to educate the public to dispel misinformation that influences their acceptability

scientific communication and education↗

Bioschemas Training Profiles: A set of specifications for standardizing training information to facilitate the discovery of training programs and resources

Stand-alone life science training events and e-learning solutions are amongst the most sought-after modes of training because they address both point-of-need learning and the limited timeframes available for upskilling. Yet, finding relevant life sciences training courses and materials is challenging because such resources are not marked up for Internet searches in a consistent way. This absence of mark-up standards to facilitate discovery, re-use and aggregation of training resources limits their usefulness and knowledge-translation potential. Through a joint effort between the Global Organisation for Bioinformatics Learning, Education and Training (GOBLET), the Bioschemas Training community and the ELIXIR FAIR Training Focus Group, a set of Bioschemas Training profiles has been developed, published and implemented for life sciences training courses and materials. Here, we describe our development approach and methods, which were based on the Bioschemas model, and present the results for the three Bioschemas Training profiles: TrainingMaterial, Course and CourseInstance. Several implementation challenges were encountered, which we discuss alongside potential solutions. Over time, continued implementation of these Bioschemas Training profiles by training providers will obviate the barriers to skill development, facilitating both the discovery of relevant training events to meet individuals learning needs, and the discovery and re-use of training and instructional materials.

scientific communication and education↗