bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.01.18.476737

Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching

FAITY, G.·Mottet, D.·Froger, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundKinematic analysis of the upper limbs is a good way to assess and monitor recovery in individuals with stroke, but remains little used in clinical routine due to its low feasibility. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Kinect v2 for the assessment of 17 kinematic variables commonly used in the analysis of upper limb reaching in stroke. Methods26 healthy participants performed seated hand-reaching tasks while holding a dumbbell to induce a behaviour similar to that of a person with a stroke. 3D upper limb and trunk motion were simultaneously recorded with the Kinect v2 (Microsoft, USA) and with the VICON (OxfordMetrics, UK), the latter being the reference system. For each kinematic outcome, the validity of the Kinect was assessed with ICC, linear regression and Bland & Altman plots. ResultsThe Kinect assesses trunk compensations, hand range of motion, movement time and mean velocity with a moderate to excellent reliability. In contrast, elbow and shoulder range of motion, time to peak velocity and path length ratio have a poor to moderate reliability, indicating that these variables should be interpreted with caution. Finally, instantaneous hand and elbow tracking are not precise enough to reliably assess Cartesian and angular kinematics over time, rendering variables such as the number of velocity peaks and the peak hand velocity unusable. ConclusionsThanks to its ease of use and markerless properties, the Kinect can be used in clinical routine for semi-automated quantitative diagnostics guiding individualised rehabilitation of the upper limb. However, engineers and therapists must bear in mind the limitations of the Kinect for the instantaneous tracking of the hand and elbow.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

bioengineeringPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

FAITY, G., Mottet, D., Froger, J.. 2022-01-20. Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.18.476737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Synergy-informed bilevel optimization reveals joint-specific benefits for realistic exoskeleton torque prediction

Simulation-driven optimization can guide exoskeleton control design, but its utility is limited by the accuracy with which muscle coordination is predicted. Strict effort-minimization formulations predict non-physiological muscle shutdown under high exoskeleton assistance, leading to peak assistive torques that exceed values reported in human-in-the-loop experiments. We evaluated the accuracy of synergy-informed simulations at predicting assistance across four single-joint exoskeleton configurations: ankle plantarflexion, knee extension, hip flexion, and hip abduction. We implemented a bilevel optimization to predict a parameterized assistive torque that minimizes metabolic cost, with assisted muscle dynamics estimated via either effort-minimization simulations (minimizing muscle effort only) or synergy-informed simulations (minimizing muscle effort constrained to a synergy structure). We used experimental data from five unimpaired adults walking at their preferred speed and compared results descriptively between the two formulations within each subject. Assistance based on effort-minimization simulations shut down agonist muscle activations and overestimated peak assistive torque compared with experimental values. In contrast, constraining muscle controls to a synergy structure prevented non-physiological muscle shutdown and yielded assistive torques closer to those measured in human-in-the-loop experiments. This benefit was not observed equally across all assisted degrees of freedom or subjects, emerging only where no single synergy could be suppressed to unload the assisted muscles. Synergy weights can therefore be interpreted as joint-specific predictors of when simulations can reliably inform wearable robot design.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Engineered microvessel networks -- Longitudinal transcriptomic profiling validates chip-grown tissues as a robust model for studying vasculature

Vascularised Organ-on-Chip (OoC) models are promising New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), but their translation requires validation for defined Contexts of Use (CoU). Here, we combine microfluidic microvessel networks (MVNs) with longitudinal bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing to determine how cell provenance influences engineered vascular phenotype. Stromal cell identity produced distinct network architectures and transcriptional trajectories, demonstrating that support cells, commonly treated as interchangeable, represent an important CoU variable. Primary human pancreatic microvascular endothelial cells failed to form stable perfusable networks, but supplementation with 10% Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) or Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOECs) rescued self-assembly. Single-cell transcriptomics identified specialised endothelial populations associated with vascular morphogenesis, including tip, stalk, phalanx, endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT) and pericyte-like endothelial cells. Failed networks lacked coherent endothelial specialisation, whereas rescued networks restored stabilising cell states and revealed FLRT2--UNC5B signalling within pericyte-like HUVECs, recapitulating a pathway implicated in angiogenic development in vivo. These findings establish cell provenance as a critical determinant of microvascular NAM performance and demonstrate how transcriptomic validation can define and strengthen the biological relevance of microvessel-on-chip models for specific CoUs.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Benchmarking foundation models for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series in cognitive aging research

Foundation models trained on large neuroimaging datasets could help smaller studies investigate cognition from brain recordings. However, whether the foundation model-derived representations improve assessment of current cognition, prediction of follow-up cognition, or characterization of cognitive change remains unclear. We evaluated nine configurations from five model families that process regional resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series, using 3,103 scans from 1,653 participants across two observational and five intervention aging cohorts. Primary frozen representations showed no consistent superiority over conventional functional connectivity for concurrent cognitive associations or diagnostic classification. Changing the readout improved selected concurrent cognitive associations without updating model weights, indicating that performance depended partly on how representations were extracted. Additional post-training and embedding alignment yielded gains in selected settings but did not consistently improve performance across outcomes. In the primary longitudinal analyses, imaging representations did not establish added value beyond baseline clinical measures. These findings show that readout choice influences concurrent cognitive associations, while the added value of these representations for longitudinal outcomes remains unestablished.

bioengineering↗