bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.01.04.474923

Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the Portuguese elderly population

Abstract

BackgroundQuadrivalent Inactivated Vaccine (QIV) is expected to replace Trivalent Inactivated Vaccine (TIV) over time. In Portugal, TIV is free of charge for risk groups, which include older adults. In its turn, QIV - which provides broader protection as it includes an additional lineage B strain - was introduced in Portugal in October 2018, but only from the influenza season 2019/20 was provided free of charge for the risk groups. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of switching from TIV to QIV from the National Health Service perspective in the Portuguese elderly mainland population ([≥] 65 years old). MethodsA decision tree model was developed to compare TIV and QIV, based on Portuguese hospitalization data for the 2015/16 influenza season. The primary health economic outcome under consideration was the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). In addition, a one-Way Sensitivity Analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of model parameters on the ICER; Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis was also carried out to analyze the robustness of the base case results. ResultsThe high cost of QIV (approximately three times the cost of TIV) would lead to a total increment of 5,283,047 {euro}, and the resulting ICER would be 26,403,007{euro}/QALY, mainly above the usual willingness-to-pay threshold. ConclusionsFrom the National Health Service perspective, our findings reveal that QIV is not cost-effective for the Portuguese elderly population due to the high cost. If the QIV costs were the same as the TIV, then QIV would be cost-effective.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tavares, D., Mourino, H., Rodriguez, C. A., Saborido, C. M.. 2022-01-04. Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the Portuguese elderly population. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.04.474923

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗