bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.12.15.472816

Genome size distributions in bacteria and archaea are strongly linked to phylogeny

Abstract

The evolutionary forces that determine genome size in bacteria and archaea have been the subject of intense debate over the last few decades. Although the preferential loss of genes observed in prokaryotes is explained through the deletional bias, factors promoting and preventing the fixation of such gene losses remain unclear. Moreover, statistical analyses on this topic have typically been limited to a narrow diversity of bacteria and archaea without considering the potential bias introduced by the shared recent ancestry of many lineages. In this study, we used a phylogenetic generalized least-squares (PGLS) analysis to evaluate the effect of different factors on the genome size of a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea. We used dN/dS to estimate the strength of purifying selection, and 16S copy number as a proxy for ecological strategy, which have both been postulated to play a role in shaping genome size. After model fit, Pagels lambda indicated a strong phylogenetic signal in genome size, suggesting that the diversification of this trait is strongly influenced by shared evolutionary histories. As a predictor variable, dN/dS showed a poor predictability and non-significance when phylogeny was considered, consistent with the view that genome reduction can occur under either weak or strong purifying selection depending on the ecological context. Copies of 16S rRNA showed poor predictability but maintained significance when accounting for non-independence in residuals, suggesting that ecological strategy as approximated from 16S rRNA copies might play a minor role in genome size variation. Altogether, our results indicate that genome size is a complex trait that is not driven by any singular underlying evolutionary force, but rather depends on lineage- and niche-specific factors that will vary widely across bacteria and archaea. Author SummaryThe evolutionary forces driving genome size in bacteria and archaea have been subject to debate during the last decades. Independent comparative analyses have suggested that unique variables, such as the strength of selection, environmental complexity, and mutation rate, are the main drivers of this trait, which complicates generalizations across the Tree of Life. Here, we applied a phylogeny-based statistical approach to assess how tightly genome size is linked to evolutionary history in bacteria and archaea. Moreover, we also evaluated the predictability of genome size from the strength of purifying selection and ecological strategy on a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea genomes. Our approach indicates that genome size in prokaryotes is strongly dependent on phylogenetic history, and that genome size is the result of the interaction of variables like past events, current selection regimes, and environmental complexity that are clade dependent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aylward, F. O., Martinez-Gutierrez, C. A.. 2021-12-16. Genome size distributions in bacteria and archaea are strongly linked to phylogeny. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.15.472816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗