bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.30.470372

Replication Study: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth

Abstract

As part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Bhargava et al., 2016) that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper "RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth" (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Here we report the results. We found two unrelated RAF inhibitors, PLX4720 or GDC-0879, selectively inhibited BRAF(V600E) cell proliferation, while the MEK inhibitor, PD0325901, inhibited BRAF(V600E), wild-type RAF/RAS, and mutant RAS cancer cell proliferation, similar to the original study (Figure 1A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). We found knockdown of CRAF, but not BRAF, in mutant RAS cells attenuated the phospho-MEK induction observed after PLX4720 treatment, similar to the original study (Figure 2B; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). The original study reported analogous results with GDC-0879, which was not observed in this replication, although unexpected control results confound the interpretation. We also attempted a replication of an assay with recombinant proteins to test the differential effect of RAF inhibitors on BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization (Figure 4A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Although we were unable to conduct the experiment as planned, we observed differential binding of BRAF by RAF inhibitors; however, it was between BRAF and beads, independent of CRAF. While these data were unable to address whether, under the conditions of the original study, the same observations could be observed, we discuss key differences between the original study and this replication that are important to consider for further experiments. Finally, where possible, we report meta-analyses for each result. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=62 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (7K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f77d0eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1333494org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c10824org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fda30f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for RAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E), mutant RAS, and wild-type RAF/RAS cell lines Cell viability assays were performed for RAF inhibitors (PLX4720 and GDC-0879) and MEK inhibitor (PD0325901) against A375, (BRAF(V600E)), HCT116 (mutant RAS), and MeWo (wild-type RAF/RAS) cells. Absolute half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) values ({micro}M) were determined for each biological repeat. EC50 values unable to be accurately estimated are reported as either >20 {micro}M or <0.078 {micro}M, which are the largest and smallest doses tested, respectively. Absolute EC50 values for each biological repeat for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted with the EC50 value reported in Hatzivassiliou et al. (2010) displayed as a single point (red triangle) for comparison. Where possible the mean and 95% confidence interval of the replication data are shown. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=198 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc3058org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e9f5d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@baf5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126717a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for each biological repeat This is the same experiment as in Figure 1. The dose response curve of each biological repeat [n=4] for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig4.gif" ALT="Figure 4"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4357eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@73e9ceorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fb01c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31a799_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 4.C_FLOATNO Testing of BRAF and CRAF antibodies used in original study The BRAF and CRAF antibodies reported in the original study (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010) were tested for suitability by Western blot. (A) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant BRAF kinase domain (KD). Membranes were probed with the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330) or with a different BRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_2721113). (B) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant GST tagged CRAF KD. Membranes were probed with the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552) or with a different CRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_10989977). (C) Representative Western blots (experiment performed once) of 16 {micro}g of whole cell lysates from the indicated human cell lines. Membranes were probed with the BRAF (RRID:AB_1840330) or CRAF (RRID:AB_397552) antibodies used in the original study. (D) Screenshot from the Constraint-based Multiple Alignment Tool (COBALT) (Papadopoulos and Agarwala, 2007) showing the alignment of full-length BRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_004324.2), the region of BRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330), the BRAF KD used in this replication attempt, and the BRAF KD used in the original study. (E) Screenshot from COBALT showing the alignment of full-length CRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_002871.1), the region of CRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552), and the CRAF KD used in the original study and this replication attempt. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/6f3sk/. C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pelech, S., Gallagher, C., Sutter, C., Yue, L., Kerwin, J., Bhargava, A., Iorns, E., Tsui, R., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Errington, T. M.. 2021-11-30. Replication Study: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.30.470372

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Psychoneuroimmunology of Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and viral hepatitis (VH) are recognized primarily as hepatic diseases, yet they impose a substantial neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) encompassing depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and fatigue. Whether these manifestations reflect psychological reactions or biologically grounded psychoneuroimmune dysfunction remains poorly understood. Here, we present a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO 2026 CRD420251081757) synthesizing evidence from 24 studies combining psychosocial outcomes with immune dysregulation markers across HCC and VH populations. Bibliometric and network analyses identified a growing psychoneuroimmunology research hub linking cytokine signaling, microglial activation, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, and gut-liver-brain axis dysregulation to the neuropsychiatric phenotype of these diseases. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.92 (95% CI: 1.09-3.39) for adverse outcomes in HCC and a pooled HR of 2.28 (95% CI: 1.48-3.52) for depression associated to genetic variants in VH. TNF-a, but not IL-6, showed a tendency toward lower levels in VH patients with versus without NPDs, suggesting differential inflammatory roles. The literature, however, remains fragmented by heterogeneous designs and a paucity of longitudinal data. A psychoneuroimmunological approach, integrating immune, endocrine, neural, and psychosocial dimensions, is essential for capturing the full systemic impact of HCC and VH and should inform future mechanistic research and multidisciplinary clinical strategies.

cancer biology↗

Nutrient Availability as a Driver of Transcriptome Reprogramming in Osteosarcoma

Background: Gene expression in mammalian cells is intricately regulated by environmental and metabolic cues. Among these, nutrient availability represents a key feature of the tumor microenvironment and has recently emerged as a potent modulator of oncogenic signaling networks. In this study, we employed a cell-line model of osteosarcoma, a rare but highly aggressive bone malignancy affecting both humans and dogs. We demonstrate that altering the concentration of a single nutrient can profoundly reprogram gene expression in osteosarcoma cells, revealing a previously underexplored phenomenon: nutrient-dependent gene regulation. This finding highlights potential opportunities for therapeutic intervention and underscores the broader implications of metabolic regulation for personalized medicine and nutrition. Methods/Results: We performed bulk RNA sequencing of an established osteosarcoma cell line cultured under varying concentrations of two key nutrients, glucose and glutamine. Differential gene expression analysis revealed a pronounced nutrient-dependent transcriptional response. The identified genes were functionally associated with pathways involved in cancer, development, nervous system regulation, metabolism, cellular signaling, and immune responses. We identified seven distinct expression patterns, one of which exhibited a striking correlation with cell growth rate and resembled a FOS-like transcriptional signature. Notably, the proto-oncogene FOS was among the identified genes and displayed a strong growth-rate-dependent expression pattern. Conclusion/Impact: Our findings demonstrate that modulation of nutrient availability profoundly reshapes the gene expression landscape of osteosarcoma cells, revealing nutrient-responsive targets with potential therapeutic relevance. This work expands our understanding of metabolic regulation in cancer and suggests that nutrient-based interventions may provide a controllable means of influencing tumor progression. Beyond oncology, such approaches may also have broader implications for developmental biology, autoimmune disorders, and nervous system function. More broadly, this study highlights the potential of metabolic interventions as a strategy for targeted modulation of gene expression programs.

cancer biology↗

Synthetic chromatin engineering for STAT1 reactivation toward restoring cisplatin sensitivity in breast cancer

Chemoresistant cancers acquire transcriptomic and epigenetic alterations through changes in transcription factor activity and chromatin accessibility. Integrative in silico analyses identified STAT1 as a recurrently suppressed transcription factor in cisplatin-resistant breast cancer. Using cisplatin-resistant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) MDA-MB-231 cells, we further confirmed reduced STAT1 expression and activity, accompanied by defective nuclear translocation, indicating that suppression of STAT1 signaling contributes to cisplatin resistance in breast cancer. To restore STAT1 activity, we sought to promote its nuclear localization and transcriptional activation through chromatin engineering. Based on the identification of PHF6 as a direct STAT1-binding protein through in silico and in vitro analyses, we engineered Dual Reader 3 (DR3), a PHF6-derived synthetic chromatin regulator designed to enhance both STAT1 interaction and chromatin engagement through histone H2B ubiquitination. DR3 induced STAT1-associated transcriptional programs, including inflammatory and tumor-suppressive miRNAs. Mechanistically, DR3 physically promoted STAT1 nuclear translocation, activated STAT1 through a non-canonical S727-dependent mechanism independent of Tyr701 phosphorylation, and enhanced chromatin accessibility at STAT1-responsive regulatory regions through histone H2B ubiquitination. CUT&RUN analysis further revealed coordinated transcriptional and epigenetic remodeling associated with DR3-mediated STAT1 activation, including upregulation of HIPK2, which enhanced cellular sensitivity to cisplatin by strengthening the intrinsic DNA damage response. Finally, we investigated whether STAT1 reactivation could alleviate acquired cisplatin resistance. In vivo delivery of DR3 restored cisplatin sensitivity in resistant breast tumors. By coupling STAT1 nuclear translocation with chromatin remodeling, DR3 reactivated STAT1-dependent transcriptional programs and restored cisplatin sensitivity in breast cancer. Together, this study establishes transcription factor reactivation through synthetic chromatin engineering as a potential therapeutic strategy for overcoming chemoresistance in solid tumors.

cancer biology↗