bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.30.470372

Replication Study: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth

Pelech, S.·Gallagher, C.·Sutter, C.·Yue, L.·Kerwin, J.·Bhargava, A.·Iorns, E.·Tsui, R.·Denis, A.·Perfito, N.·Errington, T. M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Bhargava et al., 2016) that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper "RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth" (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Here we report the results. We found two unrelated RAF inhibitors, PLX4720 or GDC-0879, selectively inhibited BRAF(V600E) cell proliferation, while the MEK inhibitor, PD0325901, inhibited BRAF(V600E), wild-type RAF/RAS, and mutant RAS cancer cell proliferation, similar to the original study (Figure 1A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). We found knockdown of CRAF, but not BRAF, in mutant RAS cells attenuated the phospho-MEK induction observed after PLX4720 treatment, similar to the original study (Figure 2B; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). The original study reported analogous results with GDC-0879, which was not observed in this replication, although unexpected control results confound the interpretation. We also attempted a replication of an assay with recombinant proteins to test the differential effect of RAF inhibitors on BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization (Figure 4A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Although we were unable to conduct the experiment as planned, we observed differential binding of BRAF by RAF inhibitors; however, it was between BRAF and beads, independent of CRAF. While these data were unable to address whether, under the conditions of the original study, the same observations could be observed, we discuss key differences between the original study and this replication that are important to consider for further experiments. Finally, where possible, we report meta-analyses for each result. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=62 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (7K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f77d0eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1333494org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c10824org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fda30f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for RAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E), mutant RAS, and wild-type RAF/RAS cell lines Cell viability assays were performed for RAF inhibitors (PLX4720 and GDC-0879) and MEK inhibitor (PD0325901) against A375, (BRAF(V600E)), HCT116 (mutant RAS), and MeWo (wild-type RAF/RAS) cells. Absolute half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) values ({micro}M) were determined for each biological repeat. EC50 values unable to be accurately estimated are reported as either >20 {micro}M or <0.078 {micro}M, which are the largest and smallest doses tested, respectively. Absolute EC50 values for each biological repeat for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted with the EC50 value reported in Hatzivassiliou et al. (2010) displayed as a single point (red triangle) for comparison. Where possible the mean and 95% confidence interval of the replication data are shown. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=198 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc3058org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e9f5d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@baf5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126717a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for each biological repeat This is the same experiment as in Figure 1. The dose response curve of each biological repeat [n=4] for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig4.gif" ALT="Figure 4"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4357eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@73e9ceorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fb01c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31a799_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 4.C_FLOATNO Testing of BRAF and CRAF antibodies used in original study The BRAF and CRAF antibodies reported in the original study (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010) were tested for suitability by Western blot. (A) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant BRAF kinase domain (KD). Membranes were probed with the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330) or with a different BRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_2721113). (B) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant GST tagged CRAF KD. Membranes were probed with the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552) or with a different CRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_10989977). (C) Representative Western blots (experiment performed once) of 16 {micro}g of whole cell lysates from the indicated human cell lines. Membranes were probed with the BRAF (RRID:AB_1840330) or CRAF (RRID:AB_397552) antibodies used in the original study. (D) Screenshot from the Constraint-based Multiple Alignment Tool (COBALT) (Papadopoulos and Agarwala, 2007) showing the alignment of full-length BRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_004324.2), the region of BRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330), the BRAF KD used in this replication attempt, and the BRAF KD used in the original study. (E) Screenshot from COBALT showing the alignment of full-length CRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_002871.1), the region of CRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552), and the CRAF KD used in the original study and this replication attempt. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/6f3sk/. C_FIG

Explore related subjects

cancer biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pelech, S., Gallagher, C., Sutter, C., Yue, L., Kerwin, J., Bhargava, A., Iorns, E., Tsui, R., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Errington, T. M.. 2021-11-30. Replication Study: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.30.470372

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Ex vivo human tumor slices more accurately predict patient responses to an oncolytic virus than in vivo mouse models

Immunotherapies, including oncolytic viruses (OV), are promising therapies that can enhance anti-tumor immune responses. However, preclinical success of immunotherapies in mouse models has not always translated to clinical benefit in cancer patients. This study compared preclinical efficacy and mechanism of action for ASP9801, a vaccinia virus expressing IL-7 and IL-12, using mouse models of colorectal cancer (CRC) in vivo and in human organotypic tumor slice models ex vivo. The murine surrogate for ASP9801 significantly reduced tumor volumes in treated and abscopal tumors in two different CRC models in vivo (MC38 and RO100). Treatment efficacy was accentuated when combined with anti-PD1 treatment, and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed depletion of tumor cells and increased T cell infiltration and activation in both treated and abscopal tumors. However, human tissue analysis ex vivo (E-slices) using PDX models and patient samples showed that ASP9801 is not effective in CRC, consistent with clinical trial results. On the other hand, ASP9801 was highly effective in GBM, indicating indication-specific efficacy of ASP9801, and how E-slice assays can be used to identify treatment-sensitive indications. This study demonstrates the superiority of E-slices over mouse models for predicting clinical response and its utility in planning clinical trials.

cancer biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Immune-cell depleted diffuse large B-cell lymphomas have reduced expression of MHC class I

Immunotherapy has transformed treatment for many cancers. In the aggressive and genetically heterogeneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is highly effective, whereas immune checkpoint blockade has shown limited benefit. Loss of MHC expression is a common mechanism to escape T-cell cytotoxicity, and loss of MHC class I (MHC-I) and II are frequent in DLBCL. We applied imaging mass cytometry to diagnostic biopsies from younger, high-risk DLBCL patients to map the tumor microenvironment (TME) spatial architecture in relation to tumor cell MHC expression, mutational status, transcriptomic and proteomic profiles. Neighborhood analyses identified four TME subtypes: immune-cell depleted and three immune-infiltrated types (mixed, CD4 T cell-rich, CD8 T-cell/macrophage-rich). Depleted cases had shorter overall survival (p = 0.033) and increased expression of proteins involved in DNA replication and proliferation markers compared to infiltrated cases. Tumor cell MHC-I expression was heterogeneous. Cases with low frequency of MHC-I-pos tumor cells were enriched for the depleted TME type. MHC-I-pos tumor cells were surrounded by CD4 and CD8 T cells and M1 macrophages, whereas MHC-I-neg tumor cells were closer to other MHC-I-neg tumor cells. These findings suggest that TME-based classification incorporating tumor cell MHC-I status may improve individualized immunotherapy selection.

cancer biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Cross-species analysis links cell-cell communication rewiring to NOTCH2 during serous endometrial carcinogenesis

Cell-cell interactions shape the fate of mutant cells during cancer initiation but how these interactions evolve during progression to pathologically recognizable lesions remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated cell-cell communication during serous endometrial carcinoma (SEC; also known as uterine serous carcinoma) development using a lineage-traceable mouse model and cross-species analyses of the mouse and human neoplastic endometrium. In mice, the early, pre-dysplastic stage was marked by a global decrease in inferred cell-cell interactions, followed by extensive communication network rewiring during neoplastic progression. Pathway-specific analysis revealed a similar pattern for NOTCH signaling, with NOTCH2 emerging as the dominant NOTCH receptor in Trp53/Rb1-mutant immature epithelial cells. Functionally, NOTCH2 promoted the outgrowth of more proliferative mutant organoids. Cross-species transcriptomic analysis identified conserved immature epithelial states in mouse and human neoplastic endometrial epithelium. In human tissues, NOTCH2 was overexpressed in serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, a precursor of SEC, and in overt SEC. Furthermore, elevated NOTCH2 expression was associated with poor patient survival. These findings link cell-cell communication rewiring during experimental SEC development to conserved neoplastic epithelial states and identify NOTCH2 as an early marker and a potential target of disease interception.

cancer biology↗