The systematic assessment of completeness of public metadata accompanying omics studies

Huang, Y.-N.; Rajesh, A.; Ayyala, R.; Sarkar, A.; Guo, R.; Ling, E.; Nakashidze, I.; Wong, M. Y.; Hu, J.; Nosov, A.; Chang, Y.; Abedalthagafi, M. S.; Mangul, S.

doi:10.1101/2021.11.22.469640

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.22.469640

The systematic assessment of completeness of public metadata accompanying omics studies

Huang, Y.-N.·Rajesh, A.·Ayyala, R.·Sarkar, A.·Guo, R.·Ling, E.·Nakashidze, I.·Wong, M. Y.·Hu, J.·Nosov, A.·Chang, Y.·Abedalthagafi, M. S.·Mangul, S.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have made it possible to collect and share a massive amount of omics data, along with its associated metadata. Enhancing metadata availability is critical to ensure data reusability and reproducibility and to facilitate novel biomedical discoveries through effective data reuse. Yet, incomplete metadata accompanying public omics data may hinder reproducibility and reusability by reducing sample interpretability and limiting secondary analyses. In this study, we performed a comprehensive assessment of metadata completeness shared in both scientific publications and/or public repositories by analyzing over 253 studies encompassing over 164 thousands samples, including both human and non-human mammalian studies. We observed that studies often omit over a quarter of important phenotypes, with an average of only 74.8% of them shared either in the text of publication or the corresponding repository. Notably, public repositories alone contained 62% of the metadata, surpassing the textual content of publications by 3.5%. Only 11.5% of studies completely shared all phenotypes, while 37.9% shared less than 40% of the phenotypes. Studies involving non-human samples were more likely to share metadata than studies involving human samples. We observed similar results on the extended dataset spanning 2.1 million samples across over 61,000 studies from the Gene Expression Omnibus repository. The limited availability of metadata reported in our study emphasizes the necessity for improved metadata sharing practices and standardized reporting. Finally, we discuss the numerous benefits of improving the availability and quality of metadata to the scientific community and beyond, supporting data-driven decision-making and policy development in the field of biomedical research. This work provides a scalable framework for evaluating metadata availability and may help guide future policy and infrastructure development.

Explore related subjects

bioinformatics Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Huang, Y.-N., Rajesh, A., Ayyala, R., Sarkar, A., Guo, R., Ling, E., Nakashidze, I., Wong, M. Y., Hu, J., Nosov, A., Chang, Y., Abedalthagafi, M. S., Mangul, S.. 2021-11-23. The systematic assessment of completeness of public metadata accompanying omics studies. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.469640

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

mFrag: Integrating External DNA Methylation References Improves Lung Cancer Early Detection by Fragmentomics

Fragmentomics analyzes features of circulating cell-free DNA fragments (e.g., fragment length or end motifs) derived from whole-genome sequencing of liquid biopsy samples (blood or other body fluids), enabling non-invasive early cancer detection. Here we present mFrag, a framework that integrates external methylation reference atlases with fragmentomic features for lung cancer detection. mFrag comprises two complementary methods: mFrag-Weight, which uses DNA methylation information to weight fragmentomic features, and mFrag-Net, which integrates fragmentomic features and external DNA methylation data through neural networks. We average the output probabilities of the two methods to obtain a final prediction score. The mFrag model was trained using 287 individuals at risk for lung cancer. In an independent case-control testing set comprising 385 non-cancer controls and 46 cancers (28 stage I, 12 stage II, and 6 stage III or IV), mFrag outperforms a DELFI-style fragmentomic approach, improving PR-AUC from 0.455 to 0.720 and sensitivity at 99% specificity from 0.043 to 0.478, with ROC-AUC from 0.871 to 0.908. For stage I lung cancer, mFrag raises PR-AUC from 0.314 to 0.558 and ROC-AUC from 0.855 to 0.894. Applied to end 4-mer motif features, mFrag likewise improved over an unweighted baseline, with gains contributed by both mFrag-Weight and mFrag-Net. In summary, mFrag improves the accuracy of fragmentomics-based lung cancer detection through integrating external DNA methylation data and the complementarity of its two component models, without incurring any additional data-generating cost.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

AOPTK: Open-Source Software for AI-Assisted Toxicological Literature Analysis

Motivation: Toxicologists today face a challenge: although vast amounts of data describing how chemicals affect human health are available across scientific publications and regulatory reports, much of this information remains underutilized because extracting and interpreting evidence across thousands of studies is impractical to perform manually. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in large language models (LLMs), provide new opportunities to automate toxicological literature analysis. Results: Herein, we present the Adverse Outcome Pathway Toolkit (AOPTK), an open-source Python package for AI-enhanced analysis of toxicological and biomedical literature. AOPTK supports (i) automated literature retrieval from databases such as PubMed Central and Europe PMC, (ii) direct processing of full-text articles in PDF format, and (iii) LLM-assisted analysis tools to identify chemicals and extract their relationships to biological effects under user-defined conditions. We demonstrate its utilities through a case-study identifying potential non-genotoxic carcinogens based on their ability to inhibit gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC). The LLM-enhanced analysis achieves 81% agreement with an expert-curated inhibitor list and 95% accuracy in predicting inhibition versus no inhibition when analysing the same subset of 86 publications. Automated retrieval and analysis of 1 124 publications from PubMed Central further demonstrated the feasibility of applying AOPTK to large-scale literature analyses. Availability: The package is developed open source on GitHub, disseminated through PyPI and Bioconda and releases are archived on Zenodo. Individual tools are available in the Galaxy platform for accessible data analysis with user-friendly, findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) and end-to-end workflows provided via WorkflowHub. The tools are available on usegalaxy.eu and usegalaxy.cz and are developed open source on GitHub.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

MELD: Mutation Effect Learning through Differential embeddings

We introduce MELD (Mutation Effect Learning through Differential Embeddings), a compact model for predicting the functional consequences of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) by training directly on the wild-type (WT) versus mutant differential. Interpreting SNVs is central to clinical genomics, yet experimental characterization cannot scale to millions of observed variants. Leading sequence-to-function models (Enformer, Borzoi, AlphaGenome) are trained on absolute genomic tracks and score variants post hoc through in-silico mutagenesis (ISM), so the WT-mutant difference never enters the training loss. MELD instead places the logit difference {Delta}z = zmut - zwt inside the supervised objective. It combines a shared CNN-Transformer encoder, a mutant-specific mutation-mask boost, multiscale mutation-centered pooling, and a learned adaptive amplification factor . On ClinVar (1.57M variants), MELD (1.9M parameters) reached an AUROC of 0.986 versus 0.800 for a same-data, same-backbone ISM baseline, with ablations confirming the contribution of each component. On a shared benchmark, it outperformed frozen foundation models with 3-1,300x more parameters (AUROC 0.967 vs. 0.924 for AlphaGenome and 0.936 for Nucleotide Transformer). With only 50, 000 training variants, it exceeded the ISM baseline trained on all 1.48M (AUROC 0.903 vs. 0.796) variants. On BRCA1 saturation genome editing, frozen MELD achieved a Spearman {rho} of 0.42, above Borzoi (0.40), and ClinVar transfer raised it to 0.45. These results demonstrate that direct differential supervision is a compact, data-efficient alternative to post-hoc ISM scoring with substantially larger pretrained models.

bioinformatics↗