bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.15.468697

Differential Methods for Assessing Sensitivity in Biological Models

Mester, R.·Landeros, A.·Rackauckas, C.·Lange, K.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Differential sensitivity analysis is indispensable in fitting parameters, understanding uncertainty, and forecasting the results of both thought and lab experiments. Although there are many methods currently available for performing differential sensitivity analysis of biological models, it can be difficult to determine which method is best suited for a particular model. In this paper, we explain a variety of differential sensitivity methods and assess their value in some typical biological models. First, we explain the mathematical basis for three numerical methods: adjoint sensitivity analysis, complex-perturbation sensitivity analysis, and forward-mode sensitivity analysis. We then carry out four instructive case studies. (i) The CARRGO model for tumor-immune interaction highlights the additional information that differential sensitivity analysis provides beyond traditional naive sensitivity methods, (ii) the deterministic SIR model demonstrates the value of using second-order sensitivity in refining model predictions, (iii) the stochastic SIR model shows how differential sensitivity can be attacked in stochastic modeling, and (iv) a discrete birth-death-migration model illustrates how the complex-perturbation method of differential sensitivity can be generalized to a broader range of biological models. Finally, we compare the speed, accuracy, and ease of use of these methods. We find that forward-mode automatic differentiation has the quickest computation time, while the complex-perturbation method is the simplest to implement and the most generalizable. Author SummaryOver the past few decades, mathematical modeling has become an indispensable tool in the biologists toolbox. From deterministic to stochastic to statistical models, computational modeling is ubiquitous in almost every field of biology. Because model parameter estimates are often noisy or depend on poorly understood interactions, it is crucial to examine how both quantitative and qualitative predictions change as parameter estimates change, especially as the number of parameters increase. Sensitivity analysis is the process of understanding how a models behavior depends on parameter values. Sensitivity analysis simultaneously quantifies prediction certainty and clarifies the underlying biological mechanisms that drive computational models. While sensitivity analysis is universally recognized to be an important step in modeling, it is often unclear how to best leverage the available differential sensitivity methods. In this manuscript we explain and compare various differential sensitivity methods in the hope that best practices will be widely adopted. In particular, we stress the relative advantages of existing software and their limitations. We also present a new numerical technique for computing differential sensitivity.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mester, R., Landeros, A., Rackauckas, C., Lange, K.. 2021-11-17. Differential Methods for Assessing Sensitivity in Biological Models. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.15.468697

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

INFORME: coupling information-theoretic experimental design with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling for efficient observation scheduling

Mathematical models of treatment response can inform individualized therapy, but their calibration often requires longitudinal measurements that are costly, burdensome, and collected on fixed schedules. Such schedules may be inefficient, over-sampling patients whose response is already well characterized while delaying informative measurements for those whose model parameters remain uncertain. We present INFORME (INFORmation-theoretic design with Mixed Effects), a framework that combines Bayesian information-theoretic experimental design with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to adaptively select each patients next measurement time. Population and response-subgroup parameter distributions learned from an existing cohort provide informative priors, allowing candidate measurement times to be ranked by their expected reduction in patient-specific parameter uncertainty. As observations accumulate, priors can be updated to reflect the response subgroup most consistent with the patients data. We evaluate INFORME in two radiotherapy datasets: 150 synthetic tumor volume trajectories from a hybrid cellular automaton model of prostate cancer spheroids (HD1) and longitudinal tumor volumes from 39 patients with head-and-neck cancer (HD2). In HD1, population priors allowed omission of both pretreatment scans, while adaptive scheduling reduced the protocol from nine scans to three or four, with the response group identified from a single post-treatment scan on day 27. In HD2, the adaptive schedule used three scans instead of six and improved prediction by delaying the first on-treatment scan from week 1 to week 2, avoiding transient dynamics that produced false-positive and false-negative response projections. Across both datasets, the adaptive schedules used a mean of 2.7 scans in stead of seven and advanced completion of the patient-specific prediction by a mean of 15.5 days (95% CI, 6.7-24.3) relative to the equidistant protocol, while treatment duration remained unchanged. INFORME therefore reduces measurement burden and accelerates patient-specific prediction by concentrating observations at times that are most informative for model calibration.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Sobetirome, a thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist, is a potential therapeutic agent for pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease with limited treatment options. Our group previously identified the antifibrotic potential of thyroid hormone, triiodothyronine (T3); however, clinical translation of thyroid hormone therapy is limited by its systemic adverse effects. In this study, we investigate whether sobetirome, a selective and well tolerated thyroid hormone receptor beta (THRB) agonist, offers antifibrotic benefits of thyroid hormone while minimizing systemic toxicity. Our study reveals that sobetirome, administered via intraperitoneal or inhalational routes, effectively mitigates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice, with no evidence of toxicity. We identified that sobetirome restores mitochondrial homeostasis via activating the THRB-PPARGC1a axis. This protects alveolar type II epithelial cells from injury-induced apoptosis while selectively inducing apoptosis and metabolic reprogramming in apoptosis resistant IPF fibroblasts. Cell-specific deletion of Ppargc1a in either alveolar epithelial cells or fibroblasts abolishes sobetirome-mediated protection, establishing PPARGC1a as an essential mediator of therapeutic response. Importantly, sobetirome reverses fibrosis-associated transcriptional programs in human IPF lung tissue, reducing expression of key fibrosis-associated genes, including collagen I alpha 1 (COL1A1), collagen III alpha 1 (COL3A1), periostin (POSTN), cathepsin K (CTSK), and Chitinase 3 Like 1 (CHI3L1), while promoting extracellular matrix remodeling, epithelial restoration, and tissue homeostasis. Collectively, our findings identify THRB activation as a novel metabolic strategy for reversing pulmonary fibrosis. Across complementary in vitro, in vivo, and human ex vivo models, sobetirome restores mitochondrial function, modulates apoptotic pathways in pathogenic cells, and promotes fibrosis resolution, highlighting its potential as a lung-targeted therapeutic approach for IPF and other fibrotic lung diseases.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Mechanistic modeling of bacterial translation initiation across growth conditions

Translation frequency in bacteria depends on how ribosomes, mRNAs, and initiation factors are allocated across growth conditions. Here, we developed a mechanistic ODE-based model of Escherichia coli translation that represents initiation, elongation, termination, and coupled auxiliary processes. Growth-dependent abundances were derived from physiological relationships and reprocessed omics data, and simulated outputs were compared with translation-frequency and active-ribosome references. The model predicts a continuous shift from complex-formation-limited toward ribosome-limited behavior as growth increases. This shift is characterized by a decline in free-ribosome abundance, whereas initiation-factor pools remain largely unbound and do not become depleted in parallel. Together with the implemented IF-dependent kinetic term, this preserved availability provides a model-internal route through which productive initiation can be maintained despite increasing ribosome utilization. Consistently, transcript-wide ribosome loading remains below its theoretical maximum, while COG-level simulations reveal distinct sector-specific translation-frequency trajectories. The study therefore provides a resource-allocation framework for interpreting how mRNA--ribosome interactions shape bacterial translation across growth conditions.

systems biology↗