bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.11.468197
Are island plants really poorly defended? No support for the loss of defense hypothesis in domatia-bearing plants
Abstract
1.The loss of defense hypothesis posits that island colonizers experience a release from predation on the mainland and subsequently lose their defensive adaptations. While support for the hypothesis is abundant, it has never been tested in domatia-bearing plants. Leaf domatia are cave-like structures produced on the underside of leaves that facilitate a defensive mutualism with predatory and fungivorous mites. I tested the loss of defense hypothesis in six domatia-bearing taxa inhabiting New Zealand and its offshore islands. No support for the loss of defense hypothesis was found. Changes in domatia investment were instead associated with changes in leaf size - a trait that has been repeatedly observed to undergo rapid evolution on islands. Overall results demonstrate that not all types of defense are lost on islands, suggesting a higher-resolution approach is needed when studying the evolution of defense on islands.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Biddick, M.. 2021-11-12. Are island plants really poorly defended? No support for the loss of defense hypothesis in domatia-bearing plants. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.11.468197
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.