bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.06.18.449069

Robust Brain State Decoding using Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory Networks in functional MRI

Abstract

Decoding brain states of the underlying cognitive processes via learning discriminative feature representations has recently gained a lot of interest in brain imaging studies. Particularly, there has been an impetus to encode the dynamics of brain functioning by analyzing temporal information available in the fMRI data. Long-short term memory (LSTM), a class of machine learning model possessing a "memory" component, is increasingly being observed to perform well in various applications with dynamic temporal behavior, including brain state decoding. Because of the dynamics and inherent latency in fMRI BOLD responses, future temporal context is crucial. However, it is neither encoded nor captured by the conventional LSTM model. This paper performs robust brain state decoding via information encapsulation from both the past and future instances of fMRI data via bi-directional LSTM. This allows for explicitly modeling the dynamics of BOLD response without any delay adjustment. The two hidden activations of forward and reverse directions in bi-LSTM are collated to build the "memory" of the model and are used to robustly predict the brain states at every time instance. Working memory data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) is utilized for validation and was observed to perform 18% better than its unidirectional counterpart in terms of accuracy in predicting the brain states.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mittal, A., Aggarwal, P., Pessoa, L., Gupta, A.. 2021-06-20. Robust Brain State Decoding using Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory Networks in functional MRI. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.18.449069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Welfare concerns for mounted load carrying by working donkeys in Pakistan

Working donkeys (Equus asinus) are vital to peoples livelihoods. They are essential for carrying goods, however globally, overloading is one of the primary welfare concerns of working donkeys. We studied mounted load carrying by donkeys and associated factors in Pakistan. A cross-sectional study of donkey owners (n = 332) was conducted, and interviews were undertaken based on a questionnaire. Owners estimated that the median weight of their donkeys was 110kg (interquartile range (IQR) 100-120kg), and that they carried a median mounted load of 81.5kg (IQR 63-99kg). We found that 87.4% of donkeys carried a load above 50% of their bodyweight ratio (BWR), the median BWR carried was 77.1% (IQR 54.5-90.7%), and 25.3% of donkeys carried above 90% BWR. Donkeys that were loaded at more than 50% BWR were more likely to sit, compared to donkeys loaded with less weight (p=0.01). Donkeys working in peri-urban and urban areas were more likely to carry a greater BWR than donkeys working in rural areas (P<0.001), as were those carrying construction materials or bricks, compared to agricultural materials (p=0.004). Age (p=0.03) and breed (p=0.01) were also associated with carrying a higher weight. Overloading based on current recommendations (50% BWR) was common, with the majority (87.4%) of donkeys reported to carry more than the recommended 50% limit. This survey provides evidence of on-the-ground working practices and factors associated with mounted load carrying, which is critical for developing evidence-based recommendations for loading, in order to improve the welfare of working donkeys.

scientific communication and education↗