bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.05.03.442467

Monotreme middle ear is not primitive for Mammalia

Abstract

The study on evolution of the mammalian middle ear has been fueled by continuous discoveries of Mesozoic fossils in the last two decades. Wang et al.1 recently reported a specimen of Vilevolodon diplomylos (IMMNH-PV01699)2 that adds to the increasing knowledge about the auditory apparatus of haramiyidans, an extinct Mesozoic group of mammaliaforms. The authors hypothesized that a middle ear with a monotreme-like incus and malleus and incudomallear articulation was primitive for mammals, which challenges the convention that the monotreme middle ear is specialized3 or autapomorphic4 in mammals. We raise concerns about terminology and identification of the incus presented by Wang et al. and show that their analysis does not support their hypothesis; instead, it supports the one by Mao et al.5,6.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meng, J., Mao, F.. 2021-05-05. Monotreme middle ear is not primitive for Mammalia. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.03.442467

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Constraining Palaeogeography and Palaeotides for the Cambrian using cnidarian medusae

The ocean tides influence key Earth system processes at a range of spatial and temporal scales. It is known that the geometry of ocean basins is the leading controller of tidal energetics, so well-constrained palaeogeographic reconstructions and tidal properties for Earths past are imperative when investigating other Earth system processes. Here, we present a novel way to constrain both deep-time tidal model results and reconstructions, by combining palaeoecology with sedimentology. We compare new palaeo-tidal model simulations for the Cambrian period, significant for the early origin and radiation of major animal fauna, to tidal proxies. One of the most abundant soft-bodied organisms preserved during this time are cnidarian medusae (jellyfish). A total of 17 cnidarian medusae localities were obtained through the literature, which had an adequate global distribution and occurred at regular intervals throughout the period of study. In some locations there were also estimates of palaeo-tidal range. Our results show a good agreement between the simulations and proxy data. In the few locations where there is disagreement, it is proposed that the palaeogeographic reconstructions are missing details, e.g., island chains, and our results allow for the palaeogeographic reconstructions to be improved. The proxy method presented is promising and can be applied to other time-periods with different marine fossils, particularly at evolutionary and extinction periods where the marginal marine environment is of importance.

paleontology↗

Two notorious nodes: a critical examination of MCMCTree relaxed molecular clock estimates of the bilaterian animals and placental mammals

The popularity of MCMCTree for Bayesian inference of clade origin timings has generated several recent publications with focal results considerably older than the fossils of the clades in question. Here we critically examine two such clades; the animals (with focus on the bilaterians) and the mammals (with focus on the placentals). Each example displays a set of characteristic pathologies which, although much commented on, are rarely corrected for. We conclude that in neither case does the molecular clock analysis provide any evidence for an origin of the clade deeper than what the fossil record might suggest. In addition, both these clades have other features (including, in the case of the placental mammals, proximity to a large mass extinction) that allow us to generate precise expectations of the timings of their origins. Thus, in these instances the fossil record can provide a powerful test of molecular clock methodology, and why it goes astray.

paleontology↗

The disadvantage of derivation: conserved systematic flaws in primary data have repeatedly biased the phylogenetic inference of Temnospondyli (Tetrapoda, Amphibia)

Phylogenetic analyses and their resultant tree topologies underlie paleobiological studies. Regardless of the type of study, the relationships of focal taxa are foundational, whether implemented in a qualitative or a quantitative framework. This reliance places a premium on the continued refinement of both phylogenetic methods and inference. Temnospondyls are a diverse clade of non-amniote ( amphibian) tetrapods whose phylogenetic relationships have been extensively explored due to their speciose nature, widespread occurrence in Paleozoic and Mesozoic paleoenvironments, and putative relationship to extant amphibians. Despite being studied by a diversity of workers, there is only one dataset that is widely employed to test the broad-scale relationships of Temnospondyli, that of Schoch (2013). This dataset has been reused in several high-profile studies testing the question of lissamphibian origins, and the original resultant topology has been widely adopted by taxonomic specialists and non-specialists alike. However, close examination of this matrix reveals discernible patterns of problematic codes related to non-homology, dependency, and unsubstantiated data (e.g., codes for postcranial characters for taxa with no known postcrania). These patterns, in conjunction with their prevalence, warrant a thorough survey of the entire matrix and subsequent reanalysis of its various forms to test whether previously published findings regarding the relationships of temnospondyls and the origins of lissamphibians are substantiated. A thorough reassessment of this matrix and several of its high-profile derivates revealed that the phylogeny of temnospondyls is more poorly known than depicted by the literature and that certain hypotheses of lissamphibian origins within Temnospondyli lack phylogenetic support.

paleontology↗