bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.04.23.440859

Homologous locus pairing is a transient, diffusion-mediated process in meiotic prophase

Abstract

The pairing of homologous chromosomes (homologs) in meiosis is essential for distributing the correct numbers of chromosomes into haploid gametes. In budding yeast, pairing depends on the formation of 150-200 Spo11-mediated double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are distributed among 16 homolog pairs, but it is not known if all, or only a subset of these DSBs, contribute to the close juxtaposition of homologs. Having established a system to measure the position of fluorescently tagged chromosomal loci in 3D space over time, we analyzed locus trajectories to determine how frequently, and how long, loci spend colocalized or apart. Continuous imaging revealed highly heterogeneous cell-to-cell behavior of foci, with the majority of cells exhibiting a "mixed" phenotype where foci move into and out of proximity, even at late stages of prophase, suggesting that the axial structures of the synaptonemal complex may be more dynamic than anticipated. The observed plateaus of the mean-squared change in distance (MSCD) between foci informed the development of a biophysical model of two diffusing polymers that captures the loss of centromere linkages as cells enter meiosis, nuclear confinement, and the formation of Spo11-dependent linkages. The predicted number of linkages per chromosome in our theoretical model closely approximates the small number (~2-4) of estimated synapsis-initiation sites, suggesting that excess DSBs have negligible effects on the overall juxtaposition of homologs. These insights into the dynamic in-terchromosomal behavior displayed during homolog pairing demonstrate the power of combining time-resolved in vivo analysis with modeling at the granular level. Significance StatementEssential for sexual reproduction, meiosis is a specialized cell division required for the production of haploid gametes. Critical to this process is the pairing, recombination, and segregation of homologous chromosomes (homologs). While pairing and recombination are linked, it is not known how many linkages are sufficient to hold homologs in proximity. Here, we reveal that random diffusion and the placement of a small number of linkages are sufficient to establish the apparent "pairing" of homologs. We also show that colocalization between any two loci is more dynamic than anticipated. Our study is the first to provide observations of live interchromosomal dynamics during meiosis and illustrates the power of combining single-cell measurements with theoretical polymer modeling.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Newman, T. A., Beltran, B., McGehee, J. M., Elnatan, D., Cahoon, C. K., Paddy, M., Chu, D. B., Spakowitz, A. J., Burgess, S. M.. 2021-04-24. Homologous locus pairing is a transient, diffusion-mediated process in meiotic prophase. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.23.440859

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A genetic screen to identify host factors required for commensal bacterial adherence to the gut epithelia

Bacterial adherence to gut epithelial cells likely involves host genetic components. We isolated a gut commensal bacterium, Lelliottia jeotgali, that can robustly colonize C. elegans through attachment to intestinal epithelial cells. Here, we developed a novel screen in C. elegans to identify host genes required for microbiome bacterial colonization. Using transgenic L. jeotgali strain expressing tdTomato, we conducted forward genetic screens in C. elegans to select for mutants that completely lost colonization. We identified multiple allelic mutations in five different C. elegans genes, termed knockout of Lelliottia adherence (kola) mutants, with a near complete loss of adherence. Each of kola-1-5 is uncharacterized and predicted to encode for a secreted or membrane-bound protein. We also identified gly-5, a GalNAc transferase that initiates O-linked glycosylation. Overall, we describe the first C. elegans screen to identify host factors that control microbiome bacterial colonization in the gut.

genetics↗

Deciphering the Dynamics of Leukemogenic Transformation from Clonal Hematopoiesis in Congenital Neutropenia

Inherited neutropenia syndromes, severe congenital neutropenia (CN) and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS), confer a high cumulative risk of MDS and AML. It is not yet clear which somatic mutations, in which combination, allele frequency and sequence identify patients at high risk. We analyzed clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in the largest representative cohort of inherited neutropenia patients to date - 658 samples from 309 patients - using error-corrected panel sequencing with longitudinal sampling. This was complemented in selected cases by single-cell DNA sequencing and genotyping of single-cell derived colonies. CH was detected in early childhood, affecting 37.7% of CN and 60% of SDS patients. The somatic mutation burden remained essentially unchanged over decades. In CN, CSF3R mutations were dominant across genetic subtypes, while additional mutations were rare and included ASXL1, TET2, and DNMT3A. ASXL1 mutations most frequently co-occurred with CSF3R mutations. Co-occurring CSF3R and TP53 mutations were only found in SRP54-CN and CLPB-CN patients. In SDS, TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by low-prevalence somatic mutations in DNMT3A, IDH1, PTPN11, and RUNX1. In CN-MDS/AML, RUNX1 and SETBP1 mutations emerged shortly before progression to MDS/AML, and membrane-proximal CSF3R mutations only at the leukemic stage. In SDS, biallelic TP53-mutant clones expanded prior to transformation, and a variant allele frequency (VAF) of dominant TP53 clone above 0.074 discriminated between patients who progressed and those who did not. Peripheral blood reflected bone marrow genotype for most key drivers. Leukemic transformation in inherited neutropenia is therefore not stochastic, but rather follows a defined mutational sequence, initiated in childhood.

genetics↗

A largely shared genetic architecture underlies Saccharomyces cerevisiae persistence across different mouse host genotypes

The extent to which interactions between microbial and host genotypes shape opportunistic pathogen persistence within hosts is an important open question. To assess the contribution of these interactions to persistence, we used Saccharomyces cerevisiae , a genetically tractable model for studying opportunistic fungal persistence in mammalian hosts. A pooled panel of barcoded haploid segregants from a cross between a laboratory strain and a clinical isolate, together with both parents, was introduced intravenously into seven genetically diverse mouse strains. We measured the relative persistence of segregants in mouse brains and livers using barcode sequencing. Persistence showed transgressive segregation in both organs. On average across the two organs, yeast genotype explained 45.2% of the variance in segregant persistence, whereas yeast genotype-by-host genotype interactions explained only 2.9%. Linkage mapping showed that loci detected in more host genotypes generally explained more phenotypic variance than those detected in fewer host genotypes. At some loci, genetic variation correlated with increased yeast persistence across multiple organs (general loci) while at others increased persistence in one organ came at the cost of decreased persistence in another (antagonistic loci). General loci contributed disproportionately to brain persistence, whereas liver persistence reflected contributions from both classes. The clinical parent showed greater persistence than the laboratory parent in every host-organ combination, and the additive effects of detected loci predicted the direction of this advantage. Overall, this work shows that in this system, relative microbial persistence is polygenic, with a strong additive component and only a very small contribution from microbial genotype-by-host genotype interactions.

genetics↗