bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.04.05.438459

Introducing Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Training into a Biomedical Sciences Graduate Curriculum

Schaller, M.·Gatesman-Ammer, A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analysis of the biomedical workforce and graduate education have produced recommendations for modifications of pre-doctoral training to broadly prepare trainees for wider ranging scientific careers. Increased exposure to career opportunities and development of training in professional skills is widely recommended, but details of implementation are not widely available. In alignment with these recommendations, we have incorporated professional skills training into the biomedical science graduate curriculum at West Virginia University. An important component of the training is developing conflict resolution and negotiation skills. This training will provide useful skills for academic careers, non-academic careers and life situations outside of the workplace. Conflict resolution/negotiation skills are also relevant in managing issues in diversity, equity and inclusivity. We report our experience in developing this component of the training program, provide an overview of the approach to delivery and practice of skills, and provide an analysis of the reception and effectiveness of the training.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Schaller, M., Gatesman-Ammer, A.. 2021-04-06. Introducing Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Training into a Biomedical Sciences Graduate Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.05.438459

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2022

Teaching the Skills and Concepts of Gene Expression Analysis during COVID-19

Teaching students how to conduct impactful gene expression studies within an authentic research paradigm typically relies on hands-on experience to develop skills at the bench, coupled with conceptual understanding of the experiments and their analyses within or outside of the lab setting. The unexpected shift of our gene expression laboratory course to a remote model provided the opportunity to assess how student learning of these skills and concepts would be affected in an entirely online environment. Our data suggest the reduced learning gains for skill-based techniques came with increased student learning of concepts and analysis, which may have aided stimulating student interest in gene expression studies.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2022

Biofilms with a dash of color: A hands-on activity for school students to build a biofilm model, and use it to understand antibiotic tolerance in biofilms

It is increasingly recognized that microbes, such as bacteria, exist in communities or biofilms, both in the environment and human body. However, school biology curriculum continues to focus on the free-floating form of bacterial life, with minimal descriptions of biofilms. Consequently, there is a need to introduce biofilms to school students, to not only to develop a fundamental understanding of microbial life, but to also highlight the challenges posed by biofilm infections to antibiotic treatment. We have developed a hands-on activity in which students build a biofilm model, and use it to understand the role of the extracellular matrix in the antibiotic tolerance of biofilms. The activity uses simple, easy to obtain supplies, and can be conducted in an in-person or virtual format, with students participating from school or home. We conducted the activity in virtual mode for a group of 59 school students across India, and present feedback and learnings that could be used to execute and adapt this accessible and engaging science experience.

scientific communication and education↗