Comprehensive analysis of chemical and biological problems associated with browning agents used in aquatic studies

Abstract

Inland waters receive and process large amounts of colored organic matter from the terrestrial surroundings. These inputs dramatically affect the chemical, physical, and biological properties of water bodies, as well as their roles as global carbon sinks and sources. To understand the complex changes associated with allochthonous inputs, experiments are needed. However, manipulative studies, especially at ecosystem scales, require large amounts of dissolved organic matter with optical and chemical properties resembling indigenous organic matter. Here we compared the chemical and biological impacts of two leonardite products (HuminFeed (HF) and SuperHume (SH)) and a freshly derived reverse osmosis concentrate of organic matter (RO) in a set of comprehensive mesocosm- and laboratory-scale experiments and analyses. The chemical properties of RO concentrate and the leonardite products were very different with leonardite products being low and RO being high in carboxylic functional groups. Light had a strong impact on the properties of leonardite products, including loss of color and increased particle formation. Furthermore, HF had drastic impacts on bacteria as light stimulated bacterial production and modified community composition, while dark conditions appeared to inhibit bacterial processes. While none of the browning agents inhibited the growth of the tested phytoplankton, Gonyostomum semen, leonardite products had detrimental effects on zooplankton abundance and Daphnia reproduction. We conclude that the effects of browning agents extracted from leonardite are in sharp contrast to those originating from terrestrially-derived DOM. Hence, they should be used with great caution in experimental studies on the consequences of terrestrial carbon for aquatic systems.