bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.01.26.428208

Do examinations prepare students for higher education? A lesson from the Covid-19 lockdown.

Jones, H. L.·Zini, V.·Green, J. R.·Prendergast, J. R.·Scott, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruption to education in the UK in 2020, with most of the school teaching moving online and national school examinations being cancelled. This was particularly disruptive for those taking end of school examinations in preparation for higher education. Biological science courses require students to absorb a lot of new vocabulary and concepts, with examinations traditionally focusing on content recall rather than reasoning. Students who had entered university in September 2019 were compared with those arriving in September 2020 with respect to their knowledge of bioscience vocabulary and understanding of key concepts. Results showed no significant difference between those who had gone through the examination process in 2019 relative to those who had not, in 2020. This suggests the cramming of information for examinations has no detectable effect on the knowledge and understanding of biology that students take with them to university.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jones, H. L., Zini, V., Green, J. R., Prendergast, J. R., Scott, J.. 2021-01-27. Do examinations prepare students for higher education? A lesson from the Covid-19 lockdown.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.428208

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2024

You can do it! Using published undergraduate research on Hydra mouth opening to train undergraduates

Biophysical research is both exciting and challenging. It is exciting because physical approaches to biology can provide novel insights, and it is challenging because it requires knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines. We have developed an undergraduate biophysical laboratory module that is accessible to both biology and physics majors, teaches fundamental skills such as time-lapse microscopy, image analysis, programming, critical reading of scientific literature, and basics of scientific writing and peer-review. This module uses published research on the biomechanics of Hydra mouth opening as its framework because this work was co-first authored by an undergraduate student and featured in the public press, thus providing two anchors that make this research accessible and exciting to undergraduates. Students start with a critical reading and discussion of the publication. Then they execute some of the experiments and analysis from the paper, thereby learning fluorescence time-lapse microscopy and image analysis using ImageJ and/or MATLAB/Python, and compare their data to the literature. The module culminates in the students writing a short paper about their results following the Micropublication journal style, a blinded peer-review, and final paper submission. Here, we describe one possible implementation of this module with the necessary resources to reproduce it, and summarize student feedback from a pilot run. We also provide suggestions for more advanced exercises. Several students expressed that repeating a published study done by an undergraduate student inspired and motivated them, thus creating buy-in and assurance that they "can do it", which we expect to help with confidence and retention.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2024

Gut MicrobiotAware: how much do we know about gut microbiota? An international questionnaire.

Over the past two decades, our understanding of human gut microbiota composition and function has grown significantly. The surge in studies and data has unveiled the profound influence of gut microbiota on host nutrition, health, and behavior, bridging biology, medicine, and ecology. The dynamic interaction between daily choices, life events, and gut microbiota composition makes it a fascinating subject for scientists to communicate to diverse audiences. Effective scientific communication involves adapting the delivery of knowledge to different audiences, using precise language in academic settings and accessible concepts in public forums like science festivals or social media. With the growing interest in gut microbiota beyond academic circles, there is an increased risk of disseminating information lacking scientific rigor. This study aims to assess the general publics knowledge about gut microbiota and evaluate healthcare professionals understanding of its links to various health conditions, ultimately informing better communication strategies for both groups.

scientific communication and education↗