bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.01.08.426012

Cofactor specificity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in Pseudomonas putida reveals a general principle underlying glycolytic strategies in bacteria

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) is widely distributed in nature and catalyzes the first committing step in the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway, feeding either the reductive PP or the Entner-Doudoroff pathway. Besides its role in central carbon metabolism, this dehydrogenase also provides reduced cofactors, thereby affecting redox balance. Although G6PDH is typically considered to display specificity towards nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+), some variants accept nicotinamide NAD+ similarly (or even preferentially). Furthermore, the number of G6PDH isozymes encoded in bacterial genomes varies from none to more than four orthologues. On this background, we systematically analyzed the interplay of the three G6PDH isoforms of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440 from a genomic, genetic and biochemical perspective. P. putida represents an ideal model to tackle this endeavor, as its genome encodes numerous gene orthologues for most dehydrogenases in central carbon metabolism. We show that the three G6PDHs of strain KT2440 have different cofactor specificities, and that the isoforms encoded by zwfA and zwfB carry most of the activity, acting as metabolic gatekeepers for carbon sources that enter at different nodes of the biochemical network. Moreover, we demonstrate how multiplication of G6PDH isoforms is a widespread strategy in bacteria, correlating with the presence of an incomplete Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway. Multiplication of G6PDH isoforms in these species goes hand-in-hand with low NADP+ affinity at least in one G6PDH isozyme. We propose that gene duplication and relaxation in cofactor specificity is an evolutionary strategy towards balancing the relative production of NADPH and NADH. ImportanceProtein families have likely arisen during evolution by gene duplication and divergence followed by neo-functionalization. While this phenomenon is well documented for catabolic activities (typical of environmental bacteria that colonize highly polluted niches), the co-existence of multiple isozymes in central carbon catabolism remains relatively unexplored. We have adopted the metabolically-versatile soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440 as a model to interrogate the physiological and evolutionary significance of co-existing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) isozymes. Our results show that each of the three G6PDHs encoded in this bacterium display distinct biochemical properties, especially at the level of cofactor preference, impacting bacterial physiology in a carbon source-dependent fashion. Furthermore, the presence of multiple G6PDHs differing in NAD+- or NADP+-specificity in bacterial species strongly correlates with their predominant metabolic lifestyle. Our findings support the notion that multiplication of genes encoding cofactor-dependent dehydrogenases is a general evolutionary strategy towards achieving redox balance according to the growth conditions.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Volke, D. C., Olavarria, K., Nikel, P. I.. 2021-01-09. Cofactor specificity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in Pseudomonas putida reveals a general principle underlying glycolytic strategies in bacteria. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.08.426012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗

Choice of annotation data significantly impacts automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

Genome-scale metabolic models are valuable tools for studying metabolism in many applications, such as metabolic engineering or understanding human disease. However, curated models are available for only a limited number of organisms, and generating high-quality models for additional organisms remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, several software tools have been developed that can produce draft models in an automated fashion, but the quality of these draft models lags behind manually curated ones. Thus, there is still a need to improve these tools. Previous work has focused primarily on developing better methods for each step in the reconstruction process, such as gene annotation and gap-filling. Here, we focus on the data that underlies these methods, such as known connections between protein sequence and function. We find that changing the source of reconstruction data has a substantial impact on the contents and predictions of generated models. In fact, the source of data can have a bigger impact than the choice of reconstruction method. Additionally, we show that the reconstruction process is sensitive to the accuracy of gene annotations in the reconstruction data. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of having functional annotation data from an organism that is closely related to the one for which a model is being built. These observations highlight the importance of reconstruction data and identify principles that should be considered when selecting data for reconstruction tools.

systems biology↗