bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.11.06.371625
The role of directionality in determining spatiotemporal tau pathology differs between AD-Like and Non-AD-Like mouse models
Abstract
IntroductionCurrent research indicates divergent spatiotemporal tauopathy progression between conditions and implicates transsynaptic connectome-based spread as a main mechanism. We examine tauopathy and connectome interactions to investigate why different spatiotemporal patterns of pathology arise. MethodsWe test whether divergent spatiotemporal tau pathology patterns from 15 mouse-model datasets can be explained by a directional bias in tau transmission along fiber tracts via a mathematical model called Directed Network Transmission (DNT). ResultsAmyloid-comorbid tauopathic mouse models meant to mimic AD demonstrate spatiotemporal tauopathy patterns consistent with retrograde direction spread biases. Non-amyloid-comorbid mice demonstrate no consistent spread biases. Further, canonically early tau pathology regions in AD are implicated as having earliest pathology in a simulation with random tauopathy seeding locations with retrograde biased spread. DiscussionThese results implicate directional biases in tau pathology spread along fiber tracts as a strong candidate explanation for divergent spatiotemporal tau progression between conditions.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Mezias, C., Raj, A.. 2020-11-08. The role of directionality in determining spatiotemporal tau pathology differs between AD-Like and Non-AD-Like mouse models. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.371625
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.