bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.10.20.346775

Cortical inhibitory network selects cerebellar signals for movement initiation

Abstract

The onset of voluntary movements is driven by coordinated firing across a large population of motor cortical neurons. This pattern of activity is determined by both local interactions and long-range corticocortical and subcortical inputs. The way remote areas of the brain communicate to effectively drive movement is still unclear. We addressed this question by studying an important pathway through which the cerebellum communicates, via the motor thalamus, with the motor cortex. We found that similar to the sensory cortices, thalamic input to the motor cortex triggers feedforward inhibition by directly contacting inhibitory cells via particularly effective GluR2- lacking AMPA receptors blocked by NASPM. Based on these results, we constructed a classifier for SCP-responsive cortical cells to identify pyramidal and PV interneurons and study their role in controlling movements. The findings indicate that PV and pyramidal cells are co-driven by TC input in response to activation of the CTC pathway. During task performance, PV and pyramidal cells had comparable relations to movement parameters (directional tuning and movement duration). However, PV interneurons exhibited stronger movement-related activity that preceded the firing of pyramidal cells. This seemingly counterintuitive sequence of events where inhibitory cells are recruited more strongly and before excitatory cells may in fact enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of cerebellar signals by suppressing other inputs and prioritizing the excitatory synchronized volley from the TC system which occurs at the right time to overcome the inhibitory signal. In this manner, the CTC system can shape cortical activity in a way that exceeds its sheer synaptic efficacy.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nashef, A., Cohen, O., Perlmutter, S. I., Prut, Y.. 2020-10-21. Cortical inhibitory network selects cerebellar signals for movement initiation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.20.346775

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Novel Tau Interaction Partners as Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Alzheimers disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to cognitive decline and ultimately death. One of the main hallmarks of this disease is the accumulation of pathological tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles. To better understand these pathological mechanisms, it is essential to characterize the tau protein interactome in health and disease. In this study, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using a human brain cDNA library, from which we identified 15 novel tau-interacting proteins that bind to full-length human tau, or its fragments: the N-terminus, microtubule-binding domain, or C-terminus. We subsequently validated these novel interactions using in vitro co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization assays with both physiological and pathological tau isoforms. Furthermore, their interactions with the human tau protein were analyzed using surface plasmon resonance. Finally, an in silico interactome analysis of these newly discovered tau-binding partners revealed several additional interactors that can link them to downstream processes critical to neurodegenerative pathways Our findings offer fresh insights into tau biology and highlight novel targets for therapeutic intervention and biomarker development.

neuroscience↗

Early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for temporal attention: A TMS study

Temporal attention enhances the selective processing of information at a specific point in time and improves perception. Previous neuroimaging studies investigating its neural mechanisms have either conflated temporal attention with temporal expectation or provided correlational evidence. Thus, whether early visual cortex is functionally necessary for temporal attention remains unknown. Here, we combined psychophysics with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine whether V1/V2 are functionally necessary and play a causal role in temporal attention. Observers performed an orientation-discrimination task in which two consecutive stimuli, T1 and T2, were presented in the periphery, preceded by a precue providing either valid or neutral temporal information. Double-pulse TMS was delivered under four conditions: at T1 (T1-TMS), at T2 (T2-TMS), at both T1 and T2 (both-TMS), or not at all (none-TMS), to assess its effects on temporal attention and the efficacy of the stimulation was verified by pupil size analysis. Behavioral results revealed robust temporal attention benefits on d', reaction time, and the Balanced Integration Score (BIS) across all four TMS conditions, indicating that the benefits of temporal attention were unaffected by occipital TMS. Furthermore, pupil dilation was largest in the both-TMS condition, followed by the T1-TMS and T2-TMS conditions, and smallest in the none-TMS condition, providing physiological verification of the stimulation protocol. Together, these findings reveal the first causal evidence that the early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for endogenous temporal attention.

neuroscience↗

Disentanglement of persistent and dynamic neural substrates of working memory

Competing theories of working memory have alternatively emphasized the importance of persistent and dynamic substrates of this cognitive function. Here, we directly tested these theories by computationally isolating the contributions of persistent and dynamic activity to working memory. We analyzed neuronal population activity recordings in macaques doing match/non-match working memory tasks. We first extracted signatures of persistent and dynamic activity through cue-specific temporal means, temporal principal components, and correlations of activity patterns across task epochs. We then generated synthetic data constrained by these signatures, and decoded cue stimuli from these data, separately from persistent and non-persistent neurons. We found that high decoding performance arose from a nuanced interplay of persistent and dynamic activity. Specifically, we could decode stimuli at empirical or above-chance levels across all tasks only from persistent neurons, but only after constraining correlations of activity patterns across epochs. In this way, we showed distinct roles for persistent and dynamic neuronal activity that help to unify two competing theories of working memory. More broadly, we also advanced computational controlled experiments as a principled framework for adjudicating between competing models of neuronal population activity.

neuroscience↗