bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.10.16.341446

Histone modifications form a cell-type-specific chromosomal bar code that modulates and maintains patterns of gene expression through the cell cycle

Abstract

BackgroundChromatin configuration influences gene expression in eukaryotes at multiple levels, from individual nucleosomes to chromatin domains several Mb long. Post-translational modifications (PTM) of core histones seem to be involved in chromatin structural transitions, but how remains unclear. To explore this, we used ChIP-seq and two cell types, HeLa and lymphoblastoid (LCL) to define how changes in chromatin packaging through the cell cycle influence the distributions of three transcription-associated histone modifications, H3K9ac, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. ResultsChromosome regions (bands) of 10-50Mb, detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy of metaphase (M) chromosomes, are also present in G1 and G2. We show that they comprise 1-5Mb sub-bands that differ between HeLa and LCL but remain consistent through the cell cycle. The same sub-bands are defined by H3K9ac and H3K4me3, while H3K27me3 spreads more widely. We found little change between cell cycle phases, whether compared by 5Kb rolling windows or when analysis was restricted to functional elements such as transcription start sites and topologically associating domains. Only a small number of genes showed cell-cycle related changes: at genes encoding proteins involved in mitosis, H3K9 became highly acetylated in G2M, possibly because of ongoing transcription. ConclusionsModified histone isoforms H3K9ac, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 exhibit a characteristic genomic distribution at resolutions of 1Mb and below that differs between HeLa and lymphoblastoid cells but remains remarkably consistent through the cell cycle. We suggest that this cell-type-specific chromosomal bar-code is part of a homeostatic mechanism by which cells retain their characteristic gene expression patterns, and hence their identity, through multiple mitoses.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Halsall, J. A., Andrews, S., Krueger, F., Rutledge, C., Ficz, G., Reik, W., Turner, B. M.. 2020-10-16. Histone modifications form a cell-type-specific chromosomal bar code that modulates and maintains patterns of gene expression through the cell cycle. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.16.341446

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

SPACE-Tag Enables High-Throughput Spatial Chromatin Profiling With CUT&Tag

Spatial epigenomics maps chromatin states within intact tissues, yet current methods remain limited by accessibility and scale. We developed SPACE-Tag, a spatial CUT&Tag framework that converts epigenetic marks-associated DNA into polyadenylated RNA through T7 based linear amplification, enabling direct integration with standard spatial transcriptomic workflows. Applied to the mouse brain, SPACETag resolved activating and repressive chromatin landscapes, recovered region-specific gene regulatory programs across anatomical domains, and showed strong correlation with existing bulk and single cell reference data. We generated an integrated multimodal atlas of the aging mouse brain, profiling five histone modifications and the transcriptome in parallel across the adult lifespan to establish the largest spatial multimodal dataset to date. This analysis uncovered sharp regional divergence with aging in the brain: fiber tracts showed widespread transcriptional downregulation, often without nearby chromatin state transitions, whereas the isocortex showed coordinated chromatin transcriptome changes, including an H3K4me1 peak module that increased with age, was enriched at super-enhancers and linked to upregulation of neuronal plasticity regulators. These findings highlight the power of multimodal and high throughput spatial genomics in uncovering the divergent regulatory logic that governs tissue-specific vulnerability and resilience in the aging brain.

genomics↗

Long-read DNA sequencing reveals global hypomethylation and focal hypermethylation in SDHx-deficient pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) are highly heritable neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic ganglia. Genomic DNA in most cancer cells is hypomethylated. However, DNA in PPGLs secondary to mutations in succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDHx) genes is reportedly hypermethylated due to succinate-mediated inhibition of DNA demethylases. We used nanopore long-read sequencing to characterize the methylome of tumor and white blood cell DNA from SDHx and non-SDHx PPGL patients, alongside normal adrenal medulla. We find that both SDHx and non-SDHx PPGLs are globally hypomethylated, particularly at centromeres. In normal adrenal medulla, CpG islands marked by H3K4 methylation are hypomethylated, whereas CpG islands lacking H3K4 methylation are hypermethylated. In SDHx-related PPGL, some H3K4me-marked CpG islands are hypermethylated, but most are not. We propose that DNA methylation in SDHx-related PPGL reflects the global hypomethylation generally observed in tumors, partly offset by succinate-mediated inhibition of TET DNA demethylases. Opposing effects of succinate may alter the balance between DNA methylation (indirect inhibition of the DNMT3A/B DNA methylases via inhibition of H3K4me demethylases) and DNA demethylation (inhibition of TET DNA demethylases) at active CpG islands.

genomics↗

High piRNA abundance is a hallmark of evolutionarily persistent piRNA-producing loci.

PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) silence transposons in the germline, and the loci that produce them diverge rapidly between species. Yet, some loci retain both their genomic location and their piRNA production across large evolutionary distances, and the basis for this conservation is unclear. To identify the features that distinguish these persistent loci, we compared piRNA production at orthologous loci in three closely related mouse species, contrasting loci that produce piRNAs in all three species with those that do so in only one. Transposon content and UTR features, often linked to piRNA production, did not distinguish the two groups. Transcription extending beyond gene ends (readthrough) was more frequent at conserved loci, but did not explain conservation once the amount of piRNAs produced was taken into account. Instead, we found that the conserved loci are those that produce the most piRNAs. The same association holds true in human and two other primate species. We speculate that most piRNAs expressed in testis are tolerated molecular noise, and that only the highly expressed minority are likely to be functional.

genomics↗