bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.08.29.257360
The SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 is not essential in vitro or in vivo in humans.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 genome annotation revealed the presence of 10 open reading frames (ORFs), of which the last one (ORF10) is positioned downstream the N gene. It is a hypothetical gene, which was speculated to encode a 38 aa protein. This hypothetical protein does not share sequence similarity with any other known protein and cannot be associated with a function. While the role of this ORF10 was proposed, there is a growing evidence showing that the ORF10 is not a coding region. Here, we identified SARS-CoV-2 variants in which the ORF10 gene was prematurely terminated. The disease was not attenuated, and the transmissibility between humans was not hampered. Also in vitro, the strains replicated similarly, as the related viruses with the intact ORF10. Altogether, based on clinical observation and laboratory analyses, it appears that the ORF10 protein is not essential in humans. This observation further proves that the ORF10 should not be treated as the protein-coding gene, and the genome annotations should be amended.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Pancer, K., Milewska, A., Owczarek, K., Dabrowska, A., Branicki, W., Sanak, M., Pyrc, K.. 2020-08-29. The SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 is not essential in vitro or in vivo in humans.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.29.257360
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.