bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.08.11.246934

The development of transformation tolerant visual representations differs between the human brain and convolutional neural networks

Abstract

Forming transformation-tolerant object representations is critical to high-level primate vision. Despite its significance, many details of tolerance in the human brain remain unknown. Likewise, despite the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to exhibit human-like object categorization performance, whether CNNs form tolerance similar to that of the human brain is unknown. Here we provide the first comprehensive documentation and comparison of three tolerance measures in the human brain and CNNs. We measured fMRI responses from human ventral visual areas to real-world objects across both Euclidean and non-Euclidean feature changes. In single fMRI voxels in higher visual areas, we observed robust object response rank-order preservation across feature changes. This is indicative of functional smoothness in tolerance at the fMRI meso-scale level that has never been reported before. At the voxel population level, we found highly consistent object representational structure across feature changes towards the end of ventral processing. Rank-order preservation, consistency, and a third tolerance measure, cross-decoding success (i.e., a linear classifiers ability to generalize performance across feature changes) showed an overall tight coupling. These tolerance measures were lower for Euclidean than non-Euclidean feature changes in lower visual areas, but increased over the course of ventral processing in most cases. These characteristics of tolerance, however, were absent in eight CNNs pretrained with ImageNet images with varying network architecture, depth, the presence/absence of recurrent processing, or whether a network was pretrained with the original or stylized ImageNet images that encouraged shape processing. Most notably, CNNs do not show increased representational consistency across feature changes at the higher layers. CNNs thus do not appear to develop the same kind of tolerance as the human brain over the course of visual processing. Significant StatementPerceiving object identity among changes in non-identity features and forming transformation-tolerant object representations is essential to high-level primate vision. Here we provide a comprehensive documentation and comparison of three tolerance measures between the human brain and CNNs pretrained for object classification. While all three measures show increased tolerance in the human brain across four types of feature changes towards the end of ventral visual processing, CNNs fail to develop the same kind of tolerance with visual processing.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xu, Y., Vaziri-Pashkam, M.. 2020-08-12. The development of transformation tolerant visual representations differs between the human brain and convolutional neural networks. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.246934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Rab10 and Arhgef7 interact to promote axon extension by linking vesicle supply and exocytosis

The formation of functional neural circuits begins with the extension of a single axon by immature neurons. Axon elongation requires an expansion of the plasma membrane that depends on the polarization of vesicle trafficking and exocytosis. It is not completely understood how the increased transport of vesicles into the growing axon is linked to their subsequent insertion into the plasma membrane. An analysis of early stages of neuronal differentiation indicates that an asymmetry in neurite length precedes axon specification and the accumulation of PPVs in the nascent axon. We show that increasing the transport of vesicles in unpolarized neurons is sufficient to promote the extension of additional axons. This effect indicates that an increased supply of vesicles stimulates their subsequent insertion into the membrane to allow neurite growth. The link between vesicle transport and exocytosis is mediated by the interaction of Rab10 with Arhgef7. Rab10 stimulates Arhgef7 activity on PPVs as a GEF for Cdc42b to promote axon extension through exocyst-dependent exocytosis, suggesting that their interaction links the increased supply of PPVs to their exocytosis.

neuroscience↗

Subcellular Spatial Profiling Unveils Links Between Neuritic Plaques with Selective Tau Vulnerability in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) features widespread extracellular amyloid-{beta} plaques but selective intraneuronal tau accumulation in cortical layers II/III and V, while layer IV remains relatively resistant. Here, we combined subcellular spatial transcriptomics with co-registered A{beta} and pTau immunohistochemistry to determine why neurons exposed to comparable plaque-associated pathology differ in somatic pTau accumulation. Plaque-associated neuritic stress occurred similarly across layers, but layer IV neurons showed attenuated pTau accumulation and reduced somatic expression of a shared neurite-soma stress program involving DCTN1, CALM3, NORAD, and PIN1. Trajectory analysis within layers identified tau-vulnerable and resistant neuronal states implicating calcium signaling, retrograde transport, and lysosomal function. Notably, astrocytic APOE-neuronal LRP1 co-expression increased significantly along the pTau-vulnerable trajectory, and APOE {epsilon}4 was associated with stronger coupling of local plaque pathology to pTau-associated molecular programs. These findings reveal neuronal programs and neuron-glia interactions underlying selective tau vulnerability and resistance in AD, highlighting potential tau-targeting therapeutics.

neuroscience↗

Widespread oscillatory suppression in autism persists in the absence of psychotropic medication.

Purpose: Investigate the neural oscillatory activity associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings in children and adolescents. Compare the corresponding oscillatory power between ASD patients taking psychotropic medication with a drug-naive group. Methods: ASD diagnosis was done using DSM-IV and CARS (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). EEG recordings employed 22 scalp electrodes (10/20 system). ASD vs. neurotypical groups were matched for sex and age (5 females; average age: ~10 years old). We analyzed the resting state (eyes open) EEG power spectrum during ~2-minute recordings. The multitaper FFT method was used to estimate spectral power for the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. We pooled together data from several electrodes to compute comprehensive power spectra and assess the oscillatory behavior of macro brain regions. Results: We observed widespread (~4Hz - 20Hz) oscillatory suppression comprising the theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. The most widespread and robust ASD-associated power suppression was in the high theta and alpha bands. Delta and gamma bands showed no significant power change for any of the brain regions studied. Results from a subgroup of patients (N = 9) who never used psychotropics confirmed these findings, indicating that they are not an artifact of medication. Conclusion: Suppression in theta, alpha and beta oscillations may offer insights into the neurophysiological underpinnings of autism and could be used as an accessible and comprehensive tool in ASD diagnosis, regardless of the patients being or not on medication.

neuroscience↗