The R1-weighted connectome: complementing brain networks with a myelin-sensitive measure

Abstract

Myelin plays a crucial role in how well information travels between brain regions. Many neurological diseases affect the myelin in the white matter, making myelin-sensitive metrics derived from quantitative MRI of potential interest for early detection and prognosis of those conditions. Complementing the structural connectome, obtained with diffusion MRI tractography, with a myelin sensitive measure could result in a more complete model of structural brain connectivity and give better insight into how the myeloarchitecture relates to brain function. In this work we weight the connectome by the longitudinal relaxation rate (R1) as a measure sensitive to myelin, and then we assess its added value by comparing it with connectomes weighted by the number of streamlines (NOS). Our analysis reveals differences between the two connectomes both in the distribution of their weights and the modular organization. Additionally, the rank-based analysis shows that R1 is able to separate different classes (unimodal and transmodal), following a functional gradient. Overall, the R1-weighted connectome provides a different perspective on structural connectivity taking into account white matter myeloarchitecture. Author summaryIn the present work, we integrate a myelin sensitive MRI metric into the connectome and compare it with a connectome weighted with a standard diffusion-derived metric, number of streamlines (NOS). Our analysis shows that the R1-weighted connectome complements the NOS-weighted connectome. We show that the R1-weighted average distribution does not follow the same trend as the NOS strength distribution, and the two connectomes exhibit different modular organization. We also show that unimodal cortical regions tend to be connected by more streamlines, but the connections exhibit a lower R1-weighted average, while the transmodal regions tend to have a higher R1-weighted average but fewer streamlines. In terms of network communication, this could imply that the unimodal regions require more connections with lower myelination, whereas the transmodal regions take more myelinated, but fewer, connections for a reliable transfer of information.