bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.07.20.213132

Selection in males purges the standing genetic load on female fitness

Abstract

Theory predicts that the ability of selection and recombination to purge mutation load is enhanced if selection against deleterious genetic variants operates more strongly in males than females. However, direct empirical support for this tenet is limited, in part because traditional quantitative genetic approaches allow dominance and intermediate-frequency polymorphisms to obscure the effects of the many rare and partially recessive deleterious alleles that make up the main part of a populations mutation load. Here, we exposed the partially recessive genetic load of a population of Callosobruchus maculatus seed beetles via successive generations of inbreeding, and quantified its effects by measuring heterosis - the increase in fitness experienced when masking the effects of deleterious alleles by heterozygosity - in a fully factorial sex-specific diallel cross among 16 inbred strains. Competitive lifetime reproductive success (i.e. fitness) was measured in male and female outcrossed F1s as well as inbred parental selfs, and we estimated the 4x4 male-female inbred-outbred genetic covariance matrix for fitness using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations of a custom-made general linear mixed effects model. We found that heterosis estimated independently in males and females was highly genetically correlated among strains, and that heterosis was strongly negatively genetically correlated to outbred male, but not female, fitness. This suggests that genetic variation for fitness in males, but not in females, reflects the amount of (partially) recessive deleterious alleles segregating at mutation-selection balance in this population. The populations mutation load therefore has greater potential to be purged via selection in males. These findings contribute to our understanding of the prevalence of sexual reproduction in nature and the maintenance of genetic variation in fitness-related traits. Impact statementWhy do the large majority of eukaryotic species reproduce sexually if it means that females must spend half of their reproductive effort producing males, while males contribute few or no resources to offspring production themselves? In principle, a lineage of a mutant asexual female that simply clones herself into daughters would grow at twice the rate of her sexual competitors (all else equal). What prevents this from being the predominant mode of reproduction throughout eukaryotes? One hypothesis regards the role of males in facilitating the purging of deleterious mutations from the populations genome since very strong selection in males, unlike selection in females, can occur in many species without reductions in population offspring numbers. Due to the inherent difficulties of isolating this source of standing genetic variation for fitness, empirical evidence for this theory is mixed and limited to indirect evidence from manipulative experiments and experimental evolution studies. Here we demonstrate that recessive deleterious alleles in a population of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, are selected against strongly in males but not females. Using a fully factorial diallel cross among 16 inbred strains, we measured the degree to which fitness in the outbred offspring of those crosses improved relative to their inbred parents. This measure is known as heterosis and offers an estimate of the relative amount of partially recessive deleterious alleles carried by a genetic strain. We then analyzed the relationship between the strains heterosis values and their additive genetic breeding values for fitness measured in males and females, revealing the extent to which segregating (partially recessive) deleterious alleles are selected against in males and females. We found that a strains heterosis value was strongly genetically correlated with its additive genetic breeding value for male fitness, but not female fitness. This suggests that mutations with deleterious effects on population growth rate due to their effects on females can be selected against (i.e. purged) more efficiently via their male siblings. This process would offer a benefit to sexual reproduction that may partly compensate for its costs, and therefore yields insight to the prevalence of sex in nature.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Grieshop, K., Maurizio, P. L., Arnqvist, G., Berger, D.. 2020-07-21. Selection in males purges the standing genetic load on female fitness. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.213132

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗

BryoCAD: Extending Plant DNA Foundation Models Beyond Flowering Plants

Bryophytes exhibit diverse genome architectures and gene repertoires, yet their functional interpretation remains constrained by incomplete genomic annotations and limited experimental resources. Although DNA foundation models offer promising solutions, their applicability to evolutionarily divergent bryophytes remains largely unexplored. Here, we introduce BryoCAD, a DNA language model developed through continued pre-training of the angiosperm-specific PlantCAD2 model on 17 bryophyte genomes spanning hornworts, liverworts, and mosses. Across three representative bryophyte genomes and four gene-boundary motif recovery tasks, BryoCAD-Small improved mean zero-shot accuracy from 45.7% to 57.0%, a 24.8% relative increase over PlantCAD2-Small, while the over 200-fold larger Evo2-20B achieved a mean accuracy of only 39.3%. Remarkably, BryoCAD-Small outperformed PlantCAD2-Large in 11 of 12 motif-recovery comparisons across the three bryophytes, highlighting the benefits of lineage-specific adaptation over model scaling alone. These improvements extended to all six tested algal species, increasing mean accuracy from 26.3% to 37.5%, although performance varied across ferns and gymnosperms. BryoCAD also enhanced gene structure annotation: replacing PlantCAD2-Small with BryoCAD-Small increased transcript-level F1 scores from 0.578 to 0.625 in Marchantia polymorpha and from 0.485 to 0.530 in Physcomitrium patens. Together, our findings demonstrate that lineage-specific continued pre-training enhances genomic sequence interpretation and gene annotation across bryophytes, providing a transferable framework for extending DNA foundation models to evolutionarily diverse, understudied plant lineages.

evolutionary biology↗