bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.07.01.180729

Human bone mesoscale 3D structure revisited by plasma focused ion beam serial sectioning

Binkley, D. M.·Deering, J.·Yuan, H.·Gourrier, A.·Grandfield, K.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Visualizing bone mineralization and collagen microfibril organization at intermediate scales between the nanometer and the 100s of microns range, the mesoscale, is still an important challenge. Similarly, visualizing cellular components which locally affect the tissue structure requires a precision of a few tens of nanometers at maximum while spanning several tens of micrometers. To address this issue, we employed a plasma focused ion beam (PFIB) equipped with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to sequentially section nanometer-scale layers of demineralized and mineralized human femoral lamellar bone over volumes of approximately 46 x 40 x 9 m3, and 29 x 26 x 9 m3, respectively. This large scale view retained high enough resolution to visualize the collagen microfibrils while partly visualizing the lacuno-canalicular network (LCN) in three-dimensions (3D). We showed that serial sectioning can be performed on mineralized sections, and does not require demineralization. Moreover, this method revealed ellipsoidal mineral clusters, noted by others in high resolution studies, as a ubiquitous motif in lamellar bone over tens of microns, suggesting a heterogeneous and yet regular pattern of mineral deposition past the single collagen fibril level. These findings are strong evidence for the need to revisit bone mineralization over multi-length scales. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=94 SRC="FIGDIR/small/180729v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fe58a0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16c726corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cc28c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1891d1f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

bioengineeringPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Binkley, D. M., Deering, J., Yuan, H., Gourrier, A., Grandfield, K.. 2020-07-02. Human bone mesoscale 3D structure revisited by plasma focused ion beam serial sectioning. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.180729

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Engineered microvessel networks -- Longitudinal transcriptomic profiling validates chip-grown tissues as a robust model for studying vasculature

Vascularised Organ-on-Chip (OoC) models are promising New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), but their translation requires validation for defined Contexts of Use (CoU). Here, we combine microfluidic microvessel networks (MVNs) with longitudinal bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing to determine how cell provenance influences engineered vascular phenotype. Stromal cell identity produced distinct network architectures and transcriptional trajectories, demonstrating that support cells, commonly treated as interchangeable, represent an important CoU variable. Primary human pancreatic microvascular endothelial cells failed to form stable perfusable networks, but supplementation with 10% Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) or Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOECs) rescued self-assembly. Single-cell transcriptomics identified specialised endothelial populations associated with vascular morphogenesis, including tip, stalk, phalanx, endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT) and pericyte-like endothelial cells. Failed networks lacked coherent endothelial specialisation, whereas rescued networks restored stabilising cell states and revealed FLRT2--UNC5B signalling within pericyte-like HUVECs, recapitulating a pathway implicated in angiogenic development in vivo. These findings establish cell provenance as a critical determinant of microvascular NAM performance and demonstrate how transcriptomic validation can define and strengthen the biological relevance of microvessel-on-chip models for specific CoUs.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Benchmarking foundation models for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series in cognitive aging research

Foundation models trained on large neuroimaging datasets could help smaller studies investigate cognition from brain recordings. However, whether the foundation model-derived representations improve assessment of current cognition, prediction of follow-up cognition, or characterization of cognitive change remains unclear. We evaluated nine configurations from five model families that process regional resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series, using 3,103 scans from 1,653 participants across two observational and five intervention aging cohorts. Primary frozen representations showed no consistent superiority over conventional functional connectivity for concurrent cognitive associations or diagnostic classification. Changing the readout improved selected concurrent cognitive associations without updating model weights, indicating that performance depended partly on how representations were extracted. Additional post-training and embedding alignment yielded gains in selected settings but did not consistently improve performance across outcomes. In the primary longitudinal analyses, imaging representations did not establish added value beyond baseline clinical measures. These findings show that readout choice influences concurrent cognitive associations, while the added value of these representations for longitudinal outcomes remains unestablished.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

PROST: An Open Toolbox, Harmonised Multi-Lab Dataset, and Meta-Analysis of Ankle-Foot Roll-Over Shape

The ankle-foot roll-over shape (ROS) is the sagittal-plane path of the centre of pressure (CoP) during the stance phase of walking, expressed in a shank-based coordinate system. It describes the effective rocker geometry that emerges from both the shape and the elastic deformation of the ankle-foot system during walking, and informs prosthetic and orthotic design. Previous studies characterised ROS in small samples with differing laboratory protocols, so they have not systematically assessed inter-individual variability or its relation to anthropometrics. We developed the open-source Public ROS Toolbox (PROST) for standardised ROS computation, and used it to harmonise marker trajectories, ground reaction forces and CoP data from four public gait datasets collected in independent laboratories. For each leg, we fitted a circular arc to the pooled ROS of all its stance phases. In a one-stage individual-participant data meta-analysis, linear mixed-effects models, with dataset as a fixed effect and participant as a random intercept, related the arc radius and the horizontal coordinate of the circle centre to anthropometrics, and, in the two self-selected-speed datasets, to walking speed. The harmonised dataset comprises 249 participants and 5,667 stance phases at walking speeds of 0.7-8.5 km/h. Circular arcs fitted the ROS closely (mean RMS radial residual 1.9 mm). The radius had a median of 410.3 mm (interquartile range, IQR, 237.6 mm), and the circle centre lay posterior to the ankle (median -20.6 mm, IQR 49.5 mm). Between-participant differences, quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), accounted for 42% of the variance in log radius (95% CI 25-57%) and 47% of the variance in the horizontal coordinate of the circle centre (95% CI 24-65%). Anthropometrics explained a negligible share of this variance (radius: pseudo-R2 -0.001, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.12), and height normalisation did not reduce radius variability (robust coefficient of variation 43% with and without normalisation). Faster self-selected walking was associated with a larger radius and a more posterior circle centre. To our knowledge, this study provides the first harmonised multi-lab ROS dataset. Together with the open-source toolbox, it is publicly available to support reproducible research in gait biomechanics, rehabilitation device design and clinical gait assessment. ROS geometry was participant-specific but was not predicted by age, sex, height or mass. A device ROS scaled from anthropometrics is therefore unlikely to match an individual's ROS, motivating studies of whether matching it, through device geometry and stiffness, improves gait mechanics.

bioengineering↗