bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.06.25.170910

When do apples stop growing, and why does it matter?

Abstract

Background Apples in the commercial food chain are harvested up to two weeks before maturity. We explore apple fruit development through the growing season to establish the point at which the features differentiating those cultivars become evident. This is relevant both for the understanding of the growing process and to ensure that any identification and classification tools can be used both on ripened-on-tree and stored fruit. Current literature presents some contradictory findings on apple development, we explored the size development of 12 apple cultivars in the Brogdale National Fruit Collection, UK over two growing seasons.Methods Fruit were sampled at regular time points throughout the growing season and four morphometrics (maximum length, maximum diameter, weight, and centroid size) were collected. These were regressed against growing degree days in order to appropriately describe the growth pattern observed.Results All four morphometrics were adequately described using log-log linear regressions, with adjusted R2 estimates ranging from 78.3% (maximum length) to 86.7% (weight). For all four morphometrics, a 10% increase in growing degree days was associated with a 1% increase in the morphometric measurement.Discussion Our findings refine previous work presenting rapid early growth followed by a plateau in later stages of development and are in disagreement with published expo-linear models. We established that apples harvested for commercial storage purposes, two weeks prior to maturity, showed only a modest decrease in size, demonstrating that size morphometric approaches are appropriate for classification of apples, both ripened-on-tree and stored.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christodoulou, M. D., Culham, A.. 2020-06-26. When do apples stop growing, and why does it matter?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.170910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Large seed size accompanying GmSDP1 suppression is linked to cellular remodeling and phytohormone regulation

Soybean (Glycine max) seeds contain approximately 20% oil and 40% protein and are important for food, feed, and biofuel. Improving soybean productivity and seed quality requires optimizing carbon partitioning during seed development. Previously, seed-specific suppression of the lipase-encoding gene Sugar-Dependent 1 (SDP1) increased seed oil content by approximately 5% while slightly reducing raffinose family oligosaccharides without compromising protein content. Seed-specific SDP1 suppression also increased seed size by 18-25% without affecting seed number, resulting in greater seed biomass per plant. To determine the developmental basis of the increased seed size, we investigated the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this phenotype. Microscopy and biochemical analyses showed that larger seeds were associated with increased seed cell size and enhanced lignocellulosic cell wall accumulation. Temporal biochemical and transcriptomic analyses further revealed coordinated changes in hormone homeostasis, including altered levels of abscisic acid, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, and jasmonoyl-isoleucine, together with differential expression of F-box and RING/U-box family genes. The results indicate that the enhanced seed size resulting from SDP1 suppression is associated with coordinated changes in cellular development, cell wall accumulation, hormone homeostasis, and regulation of gene expression during seed development. Developmental and metabolic changes associated with the increased seed size phenotype support SDP1 manipulation as a potential strategy for improving soybean seed yield and quality.

plant biology↗

Growth, yield, and quality of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) as affected by the combined application of liquid bio-slurry and NPS fertilizer rates in Kucha, Gamo zone, south Ethiopia

Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is a key cash and nutritional crop in Ethiopia, yet its productivity remains constrained by inadequate and imbalanced soil nutrient management. Therefore, the field experiment was conducted in Kucha woreda, Gamo Zone, South Ethiopia, during the 2024/25 cropping season to investigate the effect of liquid bio-slurry and NPS fertilizer rates on growth, yield and quality of hot pepper. The experiment consisted of 16 treatments arranged in a factorial combination of four liquid bio-slurry (LBS) rates (0, 20, 40, and 60 m3 ha-1) and four NPS fertilizer rates (0, 75, 150, and 225 kg ha-1) using a randomized complete block design with three replications. All experimental data were collected following standard agronomic procedures and subjected to analysis of variance using GenStat statistical software (18th edition). The results revealed that both the main and interaction effects of liquid bio-slurry and NPS significantly (p < 0.01) influenced phenological, growth, yield, and quality parameters. The combined application of 150 kg ha-1 NPS and 60 m3 ha-1 LBS produced the highest marketable dry fruit yield (2.94 t ha-1) and total dry fruit yield (3.16 t ha-1), representing a 129.69% yield advantage over the control (1.28 t ha-1) in the case of marketable dry fruit yield. The findings demonstrate that integrated nutrient management using combined LBS and NPS fertilizers significantly enhanced the productivity and quality of hot pepper. Therefore, the application of 150 kg ha-1 NPS combined with 60 m3 ha-1 liquid bio-slurry is recommended for improved hot pepper production for the study area and similar agro-ecological conditions.

plant biology↗

Higher stomatal density and smaller stomatal size associate with higher grain yield in winter wheat

In wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), flag leaf is crucial in determining grain-filling rate and final grain yield. Stomata, microscopic pores on plant surfaces, balance CO2 uptake and evaporative water loss; their numbers and aperture sizes depend on environmental factors. Previous studies have reported associations between stomatal traits and grain yield; mostly under controlled conditions. Our study aimed to investigate flag leaf stomatal anatomical and physiological traits, and their relationships with winter wheat grain yield under field conditions. We measured stomatal density and size, and stomatal conductance on adaxial and abaxial flag leaf surfaces in a three-year field study with twenty-five winter wheat varieties. Stomatal density ratio remained constant despite different stomatal densities occurring in different years, indicating coordinated adjustments of stomatal numbers between leaf surfaces in response to environmental conditions. Stomatal conductance ratios varied widely, indicating leaf-surface specific stomatal responses to environmental conditions. Grain yield was positively associated with stomatal density and negatively with stomatal size. Flag leaf removal reduced grain weight per spike and did not affect grain numbers per spike, unlike in spring wheat. Our field study provides valuable insights into the relationships between winter wheat stomatal traits and grain yield that can be used in breeding.

plant biology↗