bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.06.23.166355

Gene expression imputation provides insight into the genetic architecture of frontotemporal dementia

Abstract

The etiology of genetically sporadic frontotemporal dementia is poorly understood. Although genome-wide association studies for frontotemporal dementia have identified a small number of candidate risk regions, most of the risk genes remain largely unknown. To identify candidate genes with predicted expression levels associated with frontotemporal dementia, we integrated genome-wide summary statistics with external reference gene expression data, using a transcriptome-wide association studies approach. FUSION software was used to leverage summary statistics on frontotemporal dementia (n=2,340 cases, n=7,252 controls) and clinical subtypes (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia n=1,337 cases/2,754 controls; semantic dementia n=308 cases/616 controls; progressive non-fluent aphasia n=269 cases/538 controls, frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease n=200 cases/400 controls) from the International Frontotemporal Dementia Genomics Consortium with 53 expression quantitative loci tissue type panels (n=12,205 from five consortia). Significance was assessed using a 5% false discovery rate threshold. We identified 73 significant gene-tissue associations for frontotemporal dementia, representing 44 unique genes in 34 tissue types. Most significant findings were derived from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex splicing data (n=19 genes, 26%). Furthermore, the 17q21.31 inversion locus contained 23 significant associations, representing six unique genes whose predicted expression associated with frontotemporal dementia. Other top hits included SEC22B on chromosome 1, a gene involved in vesicle trafficking, TRGV5 on chromosome 17 and ZNF302 on chromosome 19. A single gene finding was observed for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (i.e., RAB38 on chromosome 11) with evidence from multiple tissue types. For the other clinical subtypes no significant associations were observed. We used transcriptome-wide association studies to prioritize candidate genes for frontotemporal dementia and identified a number of specific genes, including potential novel candidate genes (such as SEC22B) and previously reported risk regions (e.g., 17q.21.31). Most significant associations were observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, despite the modest sample size of the gene expression reference panel of this tissue type. This suggests that our findings are specific to frontotemporal dementia and are likely to be biologically relevant highlights of genes at different frontotemporal dementia risk loci that are contributing to the disease pathology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Reus, L. M., Pasaniuc, B., Posthuma, D., Boltz, T., International FTD-Genomics Consortium (IFGC),, Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Ophoff, R. A.. 2020-06-23. Gene expression imputation provides insight into the genetic architecture of frontotemporal dementia. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.23.166355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

SARDINE unlocks EWAS summary statistics for large-scale epigenetic biomarker analysis

Epigenetic clocks are increasingly used to study biological aging, yet their interpretation and utility remain uncertain. Meanwhile, the growing wealth of epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) summary statistics remains largely untapped for evaluating these biomarkers. Here, we introduce SARDINE, a statistical framework that estimates epigenetic clock-phenotype associations using EWAS summary statistics, clock weights, and reference methylation covariance, without individual-level data. SARDINE accurately reproduced individual-level association estimates across 38 epigenetic biomarkers and four phenotypes in 15,677 individuals. Applying SARDINE to diverse EWAS datasets revealed substantial heterogeneity in biomarker associations with aging, diseases, and lifestyle factors. By transforming CpG-level EWAS results into interpretable biomarker-level associations, SARDINE unlocks a largely underutilized data resource and establishes a scalable paradigm for systematic biomarker evaluation and discovery in aging research.

genetics↗

Deep transcriptomic analysis of molecular mediators of complex traits in heterogeneous stock (HS) rats

Rats are a powerful model organism for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of physiological and behavioral traits. Heterogeneous Stock (HS) rats, which were created by intercrossing 8 inbred rat strains, are heavily used for this purpose because of their genetic diversity and accumulated recombinations due to over 100 generations of outbreeding, which improves mapping precision. However, functional genomics resources for post-GWAS interpretation of genomic findings have been limited. We processed 3,160 RNA-seq samples, 1,932 of which were previously unpublished, from 13 tissues as part of RatGTEx. We used Pantry to quantify six modalities of transcriptome regulation (expression, isoform ratio, intron excision ratio, alternative transcription start site (TSS), alternative poly(A), and RNA stability) in each sample, which allowed us to identify 144,876 independent quantitative trait loci (QTL) for 22,599 genes. We performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) with 19,796 unique genes across tissues and transcriptional modalities and 308 traits collected from 14 studies using FUSION, which identified 7,473 significant gene-trait associations. This work presents a significant expansion of the RatGTEx resource in terms of samples, modes of transcriptome regulation, and genetic analyses. Our findings provide molecular evidence for the involvement of specific genes in mediating GWAS signals through a range of transcriptome regulatory mechanisms. These gene-to-phenotype relationships can be easily applied to genetic analyses in humans and other species. Further experiments can use this evidence to confirm these molecular mediators and target them for the treatment of behavioral and physiological traits and disorders. To facilitate use of these results, we have updated results on RatGTEx.org and provided a new interactive TWAS web portal (twas.ratgtex.org).

genetics↗

Genomic and Epigenomic Relationships Capture Different Patterns of Genotype-by-Environment Interaction in Grapevine Clones

Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) challenges selection in clonally propagated perennial crops by reducing the consistency of clone performance across years. In perennial crops, both genetic and epigenetic variation are likely to contribute to complex trait variation among clones. However, the extent to which each molecular source contribute to GEI remains poorly understood. Here, we used UMR-seq, an assay that recovers SNPs and unmethylated-region (UMR; DNA methylation) profiles from a single library, to generate paired genomic and epigenomic profiles for 206 Riesling (Vitis vinifera L.) clones phenotyped for yield and juice quality traits across nine growing seasons. We then partitioned the contribution of each omic layer to clonal variation and GEI, and examined the genomic distribution of their effects. In models without explicit GEI, environmental and residual effects were the largest source of phenotypic variance and the clonal main effect was modest. Genomic relationships accounted for most of the clonal variance in four of five traits, and adding an epigenomic relationship matrix (ERM) to the genomic relationship matrix (GRM) had little effect. In contrast, when GEI effects were modelled using factor-analytic covariance structures, the epigenomic layer captured a substantial proportion of GEI variance and exceeded the genomic contribution in four of five traits. The two omic layers differed not only in the amount of GEI captured, but also in the pattern of clone re-ranking across years. When back-solved effects were aggregated into genomic windows, the largest genomic and epigenomic effects tended to fall in different regions, with overlap no greater than expected by chance. Together, these results show that genomic and epigenomic relationships capture complementary components of year-to-year variation in clone performance, with the epigenomic contribution expressed primarily through GEI. These findings provide a basis for investigating the molecular drivers of GEI and for testing whether genomic and epigenomic information can inform selection for stable clonal performance across variable environments.

genetics↗