Relationship between input connectivity, morphology and orientation tuning of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in mouse visual cortex

Abstract

Neocortical pyramidal cells (PCs) display functional specializations defined by their excitatory and inhibitory circuit connectivity. For layer 2/3 (L2/3) PCs, little is known about the detailed relationship between their neuronal response properties, dendritic structure and their underlying circuit connectivity at the level of single cells. Here, we ask whether L2/3 PCs in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) differ in their functional intra- and interlaminar connectivity patterns, and how this relates to differences in visual response properties. Using a combined approach, we first characterized the orientation and direction tuning of individual L2/3 PCs with in vivo 2-photon calcium imaging. Subsequently, we performed excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input mapping of the same L2/3 PCs in brain slices using laser scanning photostimulation (LSPS). Our data from this structure-connectivity-function analysis show that the sources of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input are different in their laminar origin and horizontal location with respect to cell position: On average, L2/3 PCs receive more inhibition than excitation from within L2/3, whereas excitation dominates input from L4 and L5. Horizontally, inhibitory input originates from locations closer to the horizontal position of the soma, while excitatory input arises from more distant locations in L4 and L5. In L2/3, the excitatory and inhibitory inputs spatially overlap on average. Importantly, at the level of individual neurons, PCs receive inputs from presynaptic cells located spatially offset, vertically and horizontally, relative to the soma. These input offsets show a systematic correlation with the preferred orientation of the postsynaptic L2/3 PC in vivo. Unexpectedly, this correlation is higher for inhibitory input offsets within L2/3 than for excitatory input offsets. When relating the dendritic complexity of L2/3 PCs to their orientation tuning, we find that sharply tuned cells have a less complex apical tree compared to broadly tuned cells. These results indicate that the spatial input offsets of the functional input connectivity are linked to orientation preference, while the orientation selectivity of L2/3 PCs is more related to the dendritic complexity.