Hard to catch: Experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry

Abstract

Most research on aposematism has focused on chemically defended prey, but signalling difficulty of capture remains poorly explored. Similarly to classical Batesian and Mullerian mimicry related to distastefulness, such "evasive aposematism" may also lead to convergence in warning colours, known as evasive mimicry. A prime candidate group for evasive mimicry are Adelpha butterflies, which are agile insects and show remarkable colour pattern convergence. We tested the ability of naive blue tits to learn to avoid and generalise Adelpha wing patterns associated with difficulty of capture, and compared their response to that of birds that learned to associate the same wing patterns with distastefulness. Birds learned to avoid all wing patterns tested, but learning was faster with evasive prey compared with distasteful prey. Birds generalised their learned avoidance from evasive models to imperfect mimics if the mimic shared colours with the model. Despite imperfect mimics gaining protection from birds generalisation, perfect mimics always had the best fitness, supporting selection for accurate mimicry. Faster avoidance learning and broader generalisation of evasive prey suggest that being hard to catch may deter predators at least as effectively as distastefulness. Our results provide empirical evidence for a potentially widespread alternative scenario, evasive mimicry, for the evolution of similar aposematic colour patterns.