bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.01.17.910109
Mixed Logistic Regression in Genome-WideAssociation Studies
Abstract
MotivationMixed linear models (MLM) have been widely used to account for population structure in case-control genome-wide association studies, the status being analyzed as a quantitative phenotype. Chen et al. proved that this method is inappropriate and proposed a score test for the mixed logistic regression (MLR). However this test does not allow an estimation of the variants effects. ResultsWe propose two computationally efficient methods to estimate the variants effects. Their properties are evaluated on two simulations sets, and compared with other methods (MLM, logistic regression). MLR performs the best in all circumstances. The variants effects are well evaluated by our methods, with a moderate bias when the effect sizes are large. Additionally, we propose a stratified QQ-plot, enhancing the diagnosis of p-values inflation or deflation, when population strata are not clearly identified in the sample. AvailabilityAll methods are implemented in the R package milorGWAS available at https://github.com/genostats/milorGWAS. Contactherve.perdry@u-psud.fr Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Milet, J., Perdry, H.. 2020-01-17. Mixed Logistic Regression in Genome-WideAssociation Studies. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.17.910109
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.