Identification of Reptarenaviruses, Hartmaniviruses and a Novel Chuvirus in Captive Brazilian Native Boa Constrictors with Boid Inclusion Body Disease

Abstract

Boid Inclusion Body Disease (BIBD) is a transmissible viral disease of captive snakes that causes severe losses in snake collections worldwide. It is caused by reptarenavirus infection, which can persist over several years without overt signs, but is generally associated with the eventual death of the affected snakes. Thus far, reports have confirmed existence of reptarenaviruses in captive snakes in North America, Europe, and Australia, but there is no evidence that it also occurs in wild snakes. BIBD affects both boas and pythons, the habitats of which do not naturally overlap. Herein, we studied Brazilian captive snakes with BIBD using a metatranscriptomic approach, and report the identification of novel reptarenaviruses, hartmaniviruses, and a new species in the family Chuviridae. The reptarenavirus L segments identified represent six novel species, while we only found a single novel reptarenavirus S segment. Until now, hartmaniviruses had been identified only in European captive boas with BIBD, and the present results increase the number of known hartmanivirus species from four to six. The newly identified chuvirus showed 38.4%, 40.9%, and 48.1% amino acid identity to the nucleoprotein, glycoprotein, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of its closest relative, Guangdong red-banded snake chuvirus-like virus. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the found viruses originated from imported snakes, the results suggest that the viruses would circulate in indigenous snake populations. IMPORTANCEBoid Inclusion Body Disease (BIBD) caused by reptarenavirus infection affects captive snake populations worldwide, but the reservoir hosts of reptarenaviruses remain unknown. Herein, we report the identification of novel reptarenavirus and hartmanivirus species, and a chuvirus in captive Brazilian boas with BIBD. Three of the four snakes studied showed co-infection with all three viruses, and one of the snakes harbored three novel reptarenavirus L and one novel S segment. The samples originated from collections with Brazilian indigenous snakes only, which could indicate that these viruses circulate in wild snakes. The findings could further indicate that boid snakes are the natural reservoir of reptarena- and hartmaniviruses commonly found in captive snakes. The snakes infected with the novel chuvirus all suffered from BIBD; it is therefore not possible to comment on its potential pathogenicity and contribution to the observed changes in the present case material.