bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/144717

Large Meta-Analysis Provides Evidence For An Association Of Serum Vitamin D With Pulmonary Function

Xu, J.·Bartz, T. M.·Chittoor, G.·Eiriksdottir, G.·Manichaikul, A. W.·Sun, F.·Terzikhan, N.·Zhou, X.·Booth, S. L.·Brusselle, G. G.·de Boer, I. H.·Fornage, M.·Frazier-Wood, A. C.·Graff, M.·Gudnason, V.·Harris, T. B.·Hofman, A.·Hou, R.·Houston, D. K.·Jacobs, D. R.·Kritchevsky, S. B.·Latourelle, J.·Lemaitre, R. N.·Lutsey, P. L.·O'Connor, G.·Oelsner, E. C.·Pankow, J. S.·Psaty, B. M.·Rohde, R. R.·Rich, S. S.·Rotter, J. I.·Smith, L. J.·Stricker, B. H.·Voruganti, V. S.·Wang, T. J.·Zillikens, M. C.·Barr, R. G.·Dupuis, J.·Gharib, S. A.·Lahousse, L.·London, S. J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The role that vitamin D plays in pulmonary function remains uncertain. Epidemiological studies reported mixed findings for the association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and pulmonary function. We conducted the largest cross-sectional meta-analysis of the 25(OH)D- pulmonary function association to date, based on nine European ancestry (EA) cohorts (n=22,838) and five African ancestry (AA) cohorts (n=4,290) in the CHARGE Consortium. Data were analyzed using linear models by cohort and ancestry. Effect modification by smoking status (current/former/never) was tested. Results were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Mean (SD) serum 25(OH)D was 68 (29) nmol/L for EAs and 49 (21) nmol/L for AAs. For each 1 nmol/L higher 25(OH)D, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was higher by 1.1 mL in EAs (95% CI: 0.9,1.3; P=2.5x10-21) and 1.8 mL (95% CI: 1.1,2.5; P=1.6x10-7) in Aas (Prace difference=0.06), and forced vital capacity (FVC) was higher by 1.3 mL in EAs (95% CI: 1.0,1.6; P=1.1x10-20) and 1.5 mL (95% CI: 0.8,2.3; P=1.2x10-4) in AAs (Prace difference=0.56). Among EAs, the 25(OH)D-FVC association was stronger in smokers: per 1nmol/L higher 25(OH)D, FVC was higher by 1.7 mL (95% CI: 1.1,2.3) for current smokers and 1.7 mL (95% CI: 1.2,2.1) for former smokers, compared to 0.8 mL (95% CI: 0.4,1.2) for never smokers. In summary, the 25(OH)D associations with FEV1 and FVC were positive in both ancestries. In EAs, a stronger association was observed for smokers compared to never smokers, which supports the importance of vitamin D in vulnerable populations.\n\nCohort FundingThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant number R21 HL125574 funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) (co-Principal Investigators [co-PIs]: DBH and PAC). The corresponding author (PAC) had full access to the data for the meta-analysis, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. No funding source had any role in the analysis of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit it. This work was also supported in part by R01HL077612 (PI: RGB) and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ZO1 ES043012, PI: SJL). SJL is supported by the Intramural Research Program of NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Infrastructure for the CHARGE Consortium is supported in part by the NHLBI grant R01HL105756.\n\nThe Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study has been funded by NIH contracts N01-AG-1-2100 and 271201200022C, the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Intramural Research Program, Hjartavernd (the Icelandic Heart Association), and the Althingi (the Icelandic Parliament). The study is approved by the Icelandic National Bioethics Committee, VSN: 00-063. The researchers are indebted to the participants for their willingness to participate in the study.\n\nThe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by NHLBI contracts HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C. 25(OH)D measurements were conducted with the support of R01 HL103706 from the NHLBI and R01 HL103706-S1 from the NIH ODS. The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions.\n\nThis Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) research was supported by NHLBI contracts HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086; and NHLBI grants U01HL080295, R01HL085251, R01HL087652, R01HL105756, R01HL103612, R01HL120393, and R01HL130114 with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided through R01AG023629 from NIA. A full list of principal CHS investigators and institutions can be found at CHS-NHLBI.org. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Vitamin D measurements were made possible by NHLBI (R01HL084443-01A2).\n\nThis work in Framingham Heart Study was supported by NHLBIs Framingham Heart Study contract (N01-HC-25195 and HHSN268201500001I). Vitamin D measurements in the Framingham study were made possible by NIA (R01 AG14759 to SLB.).\n\nThe Health Aging and Body Composition cohort study was supported by NIA contracts N01AG62101, N01AG2103, and N01AG62106, NIA grant R01-AG028050, NINR grant R01-NR012459, and in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIA, NIH. This research was further supported by RC1AG035835, and the serum vitamin D assays were supported by R01AG029364.\n\nThe Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study is conducted and supported by NHLBI in collaboration with MESA investigators. Support for MESA is provided by contracts HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169 from NHLBI, UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001881 from NCRR, and DK063491 from the NIDDK. The MESA Lung study was supported by grants R01 HL077612, RC1 HL100543 and R01 HL093081 from NHLBI. Support for the Mineral Metabolite dataset was provided by grant HL096875.\n\nThe Rotterdam Study is funded by Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; the Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE); the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science; the Dutch Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Sports; the European Commission (DG XII), and the Municipality of Rotterdam. LL was a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation--Flanders (FWO) in Brussels, Belgium. Part of this work was supported by a FWO-grant G035014N. DSM Nutritional Products AG, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland, sponsored the Vitamin D serum analyses. The authors are grateful to the study participants, the staff from the Rotterdam Study, and the participating general practitioners and pharmacists.\n\nThe Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) is supported by contracts HHSN268201300025C, HHSN268201300026C, HHSN268201300027C, HHSN268201300028C, HHSN268201300029C, and HHSN268200900041C from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and an intra-agency agreement between NIA and NHLBI (AG0005).\n\nAuthor DisclosureDr. Psaty serves on the DSMB of a clinical trial funded by the manufacturer (Zoll LifeCor) and on the Steering Committee of the Yale Open Data Access Project funded by Johnson & Johnson.\n\nAll other authors have no conflicts of interest. There is no commercial support or financial interest from the tobacco industry for the research presented.\n\nThe study sponsors were not involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, report writing, or decisions to submit the paper for publication. PAC and DBH had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.\n\nOnline Supporting MaterialSupplemental table, figures, and methods are available.\n\nAbbreviation Footnote

Source connections

Explore related subjects

epidemiologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xu, J., Bartz, T. M., Chittoor, G., Eiriksdottir, G., Manichaikul, A. W., Sun, F., Terzikhan, N., Zhou, X., Booth, S. L., Brusselle, G. G., de Boer, I. H., Fornage, M., Frazier-Wood, A. C., Graff, M., Gudnason, V., Harris, T. B., Hofman, A., Hou, R., Houston, D. K., Jacobs, D. R., Kritchevsky, S. B., Latourelle, J., Lemaitre, R. N., Lutsey, P. L., O'Connor, G., Oelsner, E. C., Pankow, J. S., Psaty, B. M., Rohde, R. R., Rich, S. S., Rotter, J. I., Smith, L. J., Stricker, B. H., Voruganti, V. S., Wang, T. J., Zillikens, M. C., Barr, R. G., Dupuis, J., Gharib, S. A., Lahousse, L., London, S. J.. 2017-06-02. Large Meta-Analysis Provides Evidence For An Association Of Serum Vitamin D With Pulmonary Function. https://doi.org/10.1101/144717

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2018

Translating surveillance data into incidence estimates

Monitoring a population for a disease requires the hosts to be sampled and tested for the pathogen. This results in sampling series from which to estimate the disease incidence, i.e. the proportion of hosts infected. Existing estimation methods assume that disease incidence is not changing between monitoring rounds, resulting in underestimation of the disease incidence. In this paper we develop an incidence estimation model accounting for epidemic growth with monitoring rounds sampling varying incidence. We also show how to accommodate the asymptomatic period characteristic to most diseases. For practical use, we produce an approximation of the model, which is subsequently shown accurate for relevant epidemic and sampling parameters. Both the approximation and the full model are applied to stochastic spatial simulations of epidemics. The results prove their consistency for a very wide range of situations.

epidemiology↗
bioRxiv2018

The Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia registry: objectives, methods and first results

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare hereditary, multi-organ disease caused by defects in ciliary structure and function. It results in a wide range of clinical manifestations, most commonly in the upper and lower airways. Central data collection in national and international registries is essential to studying the epidemiology of rare diseases and filling in gaps in knowledge of diseases such as PCD. For this reason, the Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Registry (CH-PCD) was founded in 2013 as a collaborative project between epidemiologists and adult and paediatric pulmonologists.\n\nThe registry records patients of any age, suffering from PCD, who are treated and resident in Switzerland. It collects information from patients identified through physicians, diagnostic facilities, and patient organisations. The registry dataset contains data on diagnostic evaluations, lung function, microbiology and imaging, symptoms, treatments, and hospitalizations.\n\nBy May 2018, CH-PCD has contacted 566 physicians of different specialties and identified 134 patients with PCD. At present this number represents an overall 1 in 63,000 prevalence of people diagnosed with PCD in Switzerland. Prevalence differs by age and region; it is highest in children and adults younger than 30 years, and in Espace Mittelland. The median age of patients in the registry is 25 years (range 5-73), and 49 patients have a definite PCD diagnosis based on recent international guidelines. Data from CH-PCD are contributed to international collaborative studies and the registry facilitates patient identification for nested studies.\n\nCH-PCD has proven to be a valuable research tool that already has highlighted weaknesses in PCD clinical practice in Switzerland. Development of centralised diagnostic and management centres and adherence to international guidelines are needed to improve diagnosis and management--particularly for adult PCD patients.

epidemiology↗
bioRxiv2018

Perfect Counterfactuals for Epidemic Simulations

Simulation studies are often used to predict the expected impact of control measures in infectious disease outbreaks. Typically, two independent sets of simulations are conducted, one with the intervetnion, and one without, and epidemic sizes (or some related metric) are compared to estimate the effect of the intervention. Since it is possible that controlled epidemics are larger than uncontrolled ones if there is substantial stochastic variation between epidemics, uncertainty intervals from this approach can include a negative effect even for an effective intervention. To more precisely estimate the number of cases an intervention will prevent within a single epidemic, here we develop a single world approach to matching simulations of controlled epidemics to their exact uncontrolled counterfac-tual. Our method borrows concepts from percolation approaches prune out possible epidemic histories and create potential epidemic graph that can be realized to create perfectly matched controlled and uncontrolled epidemics. We present an implementation of this method for a common class of compartmental models, and its application in a simple SIR model. Results illustrate how, at the cost of some computation time, this method substantially narrows confidence intervals and avoids non-sensical inferences.

epidemiology↗