bioRxiv · 10.1101/130716
Expecting the Unexpected: Base-rate Neglect is Driven by Neural Activation of Common Cues
Abstract
Extensive evidence suggests that people use base rate information inconsistently in decision making. A classic example is the inverse base rate effect (IBRE), whereby participants classify ambiguous stimuli sharing features of both common and rare categories as members of the rare category. Computational models of the IBRE have either posited that it arises from associative similarity-based mechanisms or dissimilarity-based processes that may depend upon higher-level inference. Here we develop a hybrid model, which posits that similarity- and dissimilarity-based evidence both contribute to the IBRE, and test it using functional magnetic resonance imaging data collected from human subjects completing an IBRE task. Consistent with our model, multivoxel pattern analysis reveals that activation patterns on ambiguous test trials contain information consistent with dissimilarity-based processing. Further, trial-by-trial activation in left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex tracks model-based predictions for dissimilarity-based processing, consistent with theories positing a role for higher-level symbolic processing in the IBRE.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
O'Bryan, S., Worthy, D. A., Livesey, E., Davis, T.. 2017-04-25. Expecting the Unexpected: Base-rate Neglect is Driven by Neural Activation of Common Cues. https://doi.org/10.1101/130716
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.