bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/130013

Pattern-Triggered Immunity And Cell Wall Integrity Maintenance Jointly Modulate Plant Stress Responses

Abstract

Plant cells are surrounded by walls, which must often meet opposing functional requirements during plant growth and defense. The cells meet them by modifying wall structure and composition in a tightly controlled and adaptive manner. The modifications seem to be mediated by a dedicated cell wall integrity (CWI) maintenance mechanism. Currently the mode of action of the mechanism is not understood and it is unclear how its activity is coordinated with established plant defense signaling. We investigated responses to induced cell wall damage (CWD) impairing CWI and the underlying mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Interestingly inhibitor- and enzyme-derived CWD induced similar, turgor-sensitive stress responses. Genetic analysis showed that the receptor-like kinase (RLK) FEI2 and the mechano-sensitive, plasma membrane-localized Ca2+- channel MCA1 function downstream of the THE1 RLK in CWD perception. Phenotypic clustering with 27 genotypes identified a core group of RLKs and ion channels, required for activation of CWD responses. By contrast, the responses were repressed by pattern-triggered immune (PTI) signaling components including PEPR1 and 2, the receptors for the immune signaling peptide AtPep1. Interestingly AtPep1 application repressed CWD-induced phytohormone accumulation in a PEPR1/2-dependent manner. These results suggest that PTI suppresses CWD-induced defense responses through elicitor peptide-mediated signaling during defense response activation. If PTI is impaired, the suppression of CWD-induced responses is alleviated, thus compensating for defective PTI.\n\nSignificance statementStress resistance and plant growth determine food crop yield and efficiency of bioenergy production from ligno-cellulosic biomass. Plant cell walls are essential elements of the biological processes, therefore functional integrity of the cell walls must be maintained throughout. Here we investigate the plant cell wall integrity maintenance mechanism. We characterize its mode of action, identify essential signaling components and show that the AtPep1 signaling peptide apparently coordinates pattern triggered immunity (PTI) and cell wall integrity maintenance in plants. These results suggest how PTI and cell wall modification coordinately regulate biotic stress responses with plants possibly compensating for PTI impairment through enhanced activation of stress responses regulated by the CWI maintenance mechanism.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Engelsdorf, T., Gigli-Bisceglia, N., Veerabagu, M., McKenna, J. F., Augstein, F., van der Does, D., Zipfel, C., Hamann, T.. 2017-04-26. Pattern-Triggered Immunity And Cell Wall Integrity Maintenance Jointly Modulate Plant Stress Responses. https://doi.org/10.1101/130013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The genetic basis of extra-lobed leaves in ivyleaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederacea)

Intraspecific leaf shape variation is common among angiosperms. Ivyleaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederacea) has become a useful system for studying the genetics and ecology of leaf shape variation as this species exhibits two leaf shapes: leaves with entire margins, and 3-lobed leaves. It is known that these phenotypes are controlled by a single locus, and differ in their ecophysiology, geographic distribution, ecology, and fitness. However, individuals producing leaves with 1-2 extra lobes have also been observed, but the genetic basis of these phenotypes have not been described. To investigate the genetic basis of extra-lobing, we compared phenotypic distributions of leaf shapes of an F2 generation to Mendelian ratios for a single locus trait, and conducted a bulked segregant analysis to uncover quantitative trait loci. Our results suggest that producing extra-lobed leaves has a complex genetic basis and that there are multiple QTLs underlying this phenotype containing potential candidate genes involved with auxin distribution and leaf development. Whether these extra-lobed phenotypes also differ in terms of their physiology and ecology remains unexplored.

plant biology↗

The GSNOR1-VDAC3 complex acts as a cargo co-receptor for mitophagy in response to mitochondrial stress in plants

Mitochondria are central for cellular energy metabolism, and their quality is warranted by multiple mechanisms, including mitophagy, a process of selectively removing damaged, aged, or excess mitochondria. However, the regulatory mechanism of mitophagy remains elusive in plants. Here, we report that Arabidopsis S-nitrosoglutathione reductase 1 (GSNOR1), an enzyme that has long been known to degrade S-nitrosoglutathione, interacts with the outer mitochondrial membrane protein Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 3 (VDAC3) to mediate mitophagy. GSNOR1 translocates to depolarized mitochondria, binds to VDAC3, and interacts with Autophagy-related 8 (ATG8) via its ATG8-interacting motifs, thereby engulfing damaged mitochondria in autophagosomes for mitophagic degradation. Mutations in GSNOR1 or VDAC3 cause the accumulation of misshapen mitochondria and hypersensitivity to mitochondrial stress. We propose that GSNOR1 acts as a cargo receptor interacting with VDAC3 and ATG8 to target depolarized mitochondria to mitophagy, thereby regulating cellular homeostasis.

plant biology↗

Ontogenetic and time-course transcriptomic analyses of maize leaf primordia reveal regulators of transverse vein development

Leaf vein patterning varies greatly among land plants and is linked to leaf structure and function. C4 plants, such as maize, have a denser arrangement of veins than C3 plants, which is hypothesized to be a pre-adaptive trait for C4 photosynthesis. Therefore, understanding how leaf veins are patterned has implications for maximizing photosynthetic efficiency. Major maize leaf veins, called longitudinal veins, are arranged in parallel and are interconnected by transverse veins. Recent work has established molecular factors controlling longitudinal vein development; however, it is unknown how transverse veins are patterned. Here, we investigated how transverse veins establish connections within the maize vascular network. We performed anatomical analyses of transverse veins and found that despite asynchronous development, transverse veins fully integrate into the longitudinal vein network. Tracing the ontogeny of transverse vein development using the marker PIN1a-YFP, we found that two sets of two initial cells on opposing sides of adjacent longitudinal veins recruit intervening ground cells to form the provascular strand. Treatment with auxin inhibitors did not abolish transverse vein initiation, suggesting an auxin-independent pre-pattern for transverse vein initiation. Through time-course RNAseq of leaf primordia, we identified a transcriptional signature that precedes transverse vein development. Two genes that belong to this gene cluster, EREB41 and EREB114, are necessary for transverse vein formation. Together, our studies establish the ontogeny of maize transverse vein development and reveal how new vascular connections are specified, assembled, and integrated into an existing vascular network.

plant biology↗