bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/126938

Last And Corresponding Authorship Practices In Ecology

Duffy, M. A.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Authorship is intended to convey information regarding credit and responsibility for manuscripts. However, while there is general agreement within ecology that the first author is the person who contributed the most to a particular project, there is less agreement regarding whether being last author is a position of significance and regarding what is indicated by someone being the corresponding author on a manuscript. Using an analysis of papers published in American Naturalist, Ecology, Evolution, and Oikos, I found that: 1) the number of authors on papers is increasing over time; 2) the proportion of first authors as corresponding author has increased over time, as has the proportion of last authors as corresponding author; 3) 84% of papers published in 2016 had the first author as corresponding author; and 4) geographic regions differed in the likelihood of having the first (or last) author as corresponding author. I also carried out an online survey to better understand views on last and corresponding authorship. This survey revealed that most ecologists view the last author as the \"senior\" author on a paper (that is, the person who runs the research group in which most of the work was carried out), and most ecologists view the corresponding author as the person taking full responsibility for a paper. However, there was substantial variation in views on authorship, especially corresponding authorship. Given these results, I suggest that discussions of authorship have as their starting point that the first author will be corresponding author and the senior author will be last author. I also suggest ways of deciding author order in cases where two senior authors contributed equally.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

ecologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Duffy, M. A.. 2017-04-12. Last And Corresponding Authorship Practices In Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/126938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Invasion analysis for structured populations: analytical principles and numerical workflows

All real populations show some form of structure--differences among individuals, such as life stage or physiological condition, that shape a species' ability to persist. Yet it remains challenging to incorporate population structure into models of species interactions. We provide a general framework for studying competition in structured populations by quantifying species' invasion growth rates. The crux of our approach is separation of timescales: the initial dynamics of a structured population depend on how exactly it is introduced, but these transient differences do not affect long-term invasion success. Depending on the research question, the relevant long-term growth rate when rare may equivalently be derived using analytical separation of timescales, matrix population theory, or numerical simulations. Using case studies spanning developmental stage, environmental state, and infection status, we illustrate how our methodology derives simple, ecologically meaningful invasion conditions for a variety of systems. Finally, we extend the approach to fluctuating resident dynamics, showing how to use simulations or a general mathematical framework known as Floquet theory to correctly quantify invasion growth. By unifying the quantitative methods of population biology and community ecology, our framework will allow ecologists to study species persistence and coexistence across a greater variety of demographically complex systems.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Interspecific social contacts spread gut microbiota in wild rodent communities

Background: The mammalian gut microbiota influences a wide array of host phenotypes and varies substantially among individuals. Among conspecifics, microbiota composition is strongly shaped by microbial transmission through social interactions, yet the extent to which such transmission also occurs across species boundaries remains poorly understood. Here, we combine high-resolution tracking data collected over more than 10 months with gut microbiota profiling to examine social associations, space use, and microbiota similarity among individuals of three sympatric rodent species - wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), yellow-necked mice (A. flavicollis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), in two woodlands. By integrating multi-species social networks and spatial overlap with individual microbiota data, we test how both conspecific and interspecific interactions shape gut microbiota composition. Results: At both study sites, social associations strongly predicted microbiota similarity among conspecific individuals, whereas spatial proximity consistently predicted microbiota similarity among interspecific pairs. In addition, social associations between mice of different species predicted microbiota similarity, although this effect was weaker than that observed within species and was asymmetric, with evidence for stronger microbial transmission from wood mice to yellow-necked mice than vice versa. By focusing on species-indicative bacterial taxa, we further show that wood mice with more social connections to yellow-necked mice harboured a greater richness of gut bacteria typical of yellow-necked mice. Conclusions: Together, these results demonstrate that individual-level social behaviour can influence gut microbial transmission across species boundaries, particularly among closely related species with overlapping ecological niches. Interspecific social interactions may therefore represent an underappreciated pathway for the acquisition of novel gut symbionts in multi-species communities.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Microscale nonrandomness revisited: An overlooked predictor of ecological change

Abrupt ecological transitions have driven the development of early warning signal metrics that track how ecological systems respond as external conditions gradually change and systems approach transitions between states. However, their generality and applicability remain uncertain, particularly for short-term ecological dynamics that can occur without directional external change. To address this gap, we propose a general framework based on the hypothesis that microscale nonrandomness, quantified from frequency distributions or spatial patterns, predicts subsequent short-term rates of change in populations and interactions, as well as current macroscale ecosystem states. We applied the framework to four datasets: time series from an incubation experiment of phytoplankton-parasitic chytrid interactions; spatiotemporal field observations of leaf beetles on willow trees and aphids in a crop system; and spatial snapshot data linking soil surface characteristics with aboveground and soil ecosystem properties in a forest vegetations-soil system. We quantified microscale nonrandomness using Morisita I_{delta} from frequency distributions and Moran's I and SADIE from spatial patterns. Across all systems, models incorporating microscale nonrandomness metrics consistently showed greater cross-validated predictive performance than those based on macroscale variables or spatial averages alone. Although their relative performance varied among systems, frequency-based metrics performed as well as or better than spatially explicit metrics in some cases. The consistent improvement across contrasting systems supports the broad applicability of this framework, including under limited data conditions. This framework broadens ecological forecasting to short-term, continuous dynamics beyond those associated with directional environmental change.

ecology↗