bioRxiv ScienceSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/002717

Immune stimulation reduces sleep and memory ability in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

Psychoneuroimmunology studies the increasing number of connections between neurobiology and immunology. We establish Drosophila melanogaster as a tractable model in this field by demonstrating the effects of the immune response on two fundamental behaviours: sleep and memory ability.\n\nWe used the Geneswitch system to upregulate peptidoglycan receptor protein (PGRP) expression, thereby stimulating the immune system in the absence of infection. Geneswitch was activated by feeding the steroid RU486, to the flies. Importantly, by stimulating the immune system of adult flies in the absence of infection we have avoided the added complications of developmental and disease effects that have confounded other studies. We used an aversive classical conditioning paradigm to quantify memory and measures of activity to infer sleep.\n\nImmune stimulated flies exhibited reduced levels of sleep, which could not be explained by a generalised increase in waking activity. The effects on sleep were more pronounced for day compared to night sleep. Immune stimulated flies also showed a reduction in memory abilities.\n\nThese are important results as they establish Drosophila as a model for immune-neural interactions and provide a possible role for sleep in the interplay between the immune response and memory.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eamonn Mallon, Akram Alghamdi, Robert Holdbrook, Ezio Rosato. 2014-02-14. Immune stimulation reduces sleep and memory ability in Drosophila melanogaster. https://doi.org/10.1101/002717

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A critical review of the use and performance of different function types for modeling temperature-dependent development of arthropod larvae

Temperature-dependent development influences production rates of arthropods, including crustaceans important to fisheries and agricultural pests. Numerous candidate equation types (development functions) exist to describe the effect of temperature on development time, yet most studies use only a single type of equation and there is no consensus as to which, if any model predicts development rates better than the others, nor what the consequences of selecting a potentially incorrect model equation are on predicted development times. In this study, a literature search was performed of studies fitting development functions to development of arthropod larvae (99 species). The published data of most (79) of these species were then fit with 33 commonly-used development functions. Overall performance of each function type and consequences of using a function other than the best one to model data were assessed. Performance was also related to taxonomy and the range of temperatures examined. The majority (91.1 %) of studies were found to not use the best function out of those tested. Using the incorrect model lead to significantly less accurate (e.g., mean difference {+/-} SE 85.9 {+/-} 27.4 %, range: -1.7 to 1725.5 %) predictions of development times than the best function. Overall, more complex functions performed poorly relative to simpler ones. However, performance of some complex functions improved when wide temperature ranges were tested, which tended to be confined to studies of insects or arachnids compared with those of crustaceans. Results indicate the biological significance of choosing the best-fitting model to describe temperature-dependent development time data.\n\nHighlightsO_LITemperature-dependent development functions of arthropod larvae were reviewed\nC_LIO_LI79 published datasets were re-tested and fit with 33 different function types\nC_LIO_LI91.1 % of published studies did not fit their data with the best function of those tested\nC_LIO_LIPerformance differed among functions and was related to taxon and temperature range tested\nC_LIO_LIFunction type impacted predicted development times, so using the best function matters\nC_LI

Zoology

Expression biomarkers used for the selective breeding of complex polygenic traits

We present a novel way to select for highly polygenic traits. For millennia, humans have used observable phenotypes to selectively breed stronger or more productive livestock and crops. Selection on genotype, using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and quantitative trait loci (QTLs), is also now applied broadly in livestock breeding programs; however, selection on protein or mRNA expression markers have not been proved useful yet. Here we demonstrate the utility of protein markers to select for disease-resistant behaviour in the European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Robust, mechanistically-linked protein expression markers, by integrating cis and trans effects from many genomic loci, may overcome limitations of genomic markers to allow for selection. After three generations of selection, the resulting stock performed as well or better than bees selected using phenotype-based assessment of this trait, when challenged with disease. This is the first demonstration of the efficacy of protein markers for selective breeding in any agricultural species, plant or animal.\n\nSignificance statementThe honey bee has been in the news a lot recently, largely because of world-wide die-offs due to the parasitic Varroa mite, which is becoming resistant to the chemical controls the bee industry uses. In this study, we show that robust expression biomarkers of a disease-resistance trait can be used, in an out-bred population, to select for that trait. After three generations of selection, the resulting stock performed as well or better than bees selected using the phenotypic best method for assessing this trait when challenged with disease. This is the first demonstration of an expression marker for selective breeding in any agricultural species, plant or animal. This also represents a completely novel way to select for highly polygenic traits.

Zoology

Inferring physiological energetics of loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) from existing data using a general metabolic theory

Loggerhead turtle is an endangered sea turtle species with a migratory lifestyle and worldwide distribution, experiencing markedly different habitats throughout its lifetime. Environmental conditions, especially food availability and temperature, constrain the acquisition and the use of available energy, thus affecting physiological processes such as growth, maturation, and reproduction. These physiological processes at the population level determine survival, fecundity, and ultimately the population growth rate--a key indicator of the success of conservation efforts. As a first step towards the comprehensive understanding of how environment shapes the physiology and the life cycle of a loggerhead turtle, we constructed a full life cycle model based on the principles of energy acquisition and utilization embedded in the Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory. We adapted the standard DEB model using data from published and unpublished sources to obtain parameter estimates and model predictions that could be compared with data. The outcome was a successful mathematical description of ontogeny and life history traits of the loggerhead turtle. Some deviations between the model and the data existed (such as an earlier age at sexual maturity and faster growth of the post-hatchlings), yet probable causes for these deviations were found informative and discussed in great detail. Physiological traits such as the capacity to withstand starvation, trade-offs between reproduction and growth, and changes in the energy budget throughout the ontogeny were inferred from the model. The results offer new insights into physiology and ecology of loggerhead turtle with the potential to lead to novel approaches in conservation of this endangered species.

Zoology