bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bioinformatics

Explore bioRxiv bioinformatics preprints. Search computational biology methods, sequence analysis and single-cell analysis; follow source links for manuscript details.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

An Empirical Analysis of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models on Bioinformatics Literature: PRSGPT and BioStarsGPT

Large language models (LLMs) often lack specialized knowledge for complex bioinformatics applications. We present a reproducible pipeline for fine-tuning LLMs on specialized bioinformatics data, demonstrated through two use cases: PRSGPT, focused on polygenic risk score (PRS) tools, and BioStarsGPT, trained on community forum discussions. The nine-step pipeline integrates diverse data sources, structured preprocessing, prompt-based question-answer (QA) generation (via Google Gemini), natural language inference (NLI) for quality control, semantic deduplication, clustering-based data splitting, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning using LoRA. We fine-tuned three LLMs (LLaMA-3.2-3B, Qwen2.5-7B, Gemma) and benchmarked them on over 14 lexical and semantic metrics. Qwen2.5-7B emerged as the best performer, with BLEU-4 and ROUGE-1 improvements of 82% and 70% for PRSGPT and 6% and 18% for BioStarsGPT, respectively. The open-source datasets produced include over 28,000 QA pairs for PRSGPT and 154,282 for BioStarsGPT. Human evaluation of PRSGPT yielded 61.9% accuracy on the PRS tools comparison task, comparable to Google Gemini (61.4%), but with richer methodological detail and accurate citations. BioStarsGPT demonstrated 59% conceptual accuracy across 142 curated bioinformatics questions. Our pipeline enables scalable, domain-specific fine-tuning of LLMs. It enables privacy-preserving, locally deployable bioinformatics assistants, explores their practical applications, and addresses the challenges, limitations, and mitigation strategies associated with their development and use. Key PointsO_LIWe present a comprehensive 9-step pipeline for fine-tuning large language models on bioinformatics data, demonstrated through PRSGPT (PRS tools) and BioStarsGPT (forum discussions). C_LIO_LIThe pipeline generated over 28,000 QA pairs for PRSGPT from diverse sources (PDFs, GitHub repositories, research articles) and 154,282 QA pairs for BioStarsGPT from community forum discussions. C_LIO_LIQwen2.5-7B emerged as the best-performing model, achieving BLEU-4 improvements of 82% for PRSGPT and 6% for BioStarsGPT, with ROUGE-1 improvements of 70% and 18% respectively. C_LIO_LIThe methodology integrates automated QA generation via Google Gemini, NLI for quality control, semantic deduplication, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning using LoRA, providing a scalable framework for domain-specific LLM adaptation. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

PlotGDP: an AI Agent for Bioinformatics Plotting

High-quality bioinformatics plotting is important for biology research, especially when preparing for publications. However, the long learning curve and complex coding environment configuration often appear as inevitable costs towards the creation of publication-ready plots. Here, we present PlotGDP (https://plotgdp.biogdp.com/), an AI agent-based web server for bioinformatics plotting. Built on large language models (LLMs), the intelligent plotting agent is designed to accommodate various types of bioinformatics plots, while offering easy usage with simple natural language commands from users. No coding experience or environment deployment is required, since all the user-uploaded data is processed by LLM-generated codes on our remote high-performance server. Additionally, all plotting sessions are based on curated template scripts to minimize the risk of hallucinations from the LLM. Aided by PlotGDP, we hope to contribute to the global biology research community by constructing an online platform for fast and high-quality bioinformatics visualization. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/702995v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@73c77dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12ddfc6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@be5963org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@de90b6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstract.C_FLOATNO PlotGDP: an AI Agent for Bioinformatics Plotting C_FIG

bioinformatics↗

Automatic bioinformatic software named entity recognition from literature

Bioinformatics software and databases are essential components of modern life science research, yet their mentions in the scientific literature are often inconsistent and difficult to systematically identify at scale. The lack of a comprehensive and up-to-date catalog of bioinformatics resources hinders efforts toward automated biomedical knowledge extraction and streamlined data analysis. Here we present SNAIL, a hybrid named entity recognition framework designed to automatically identify bioinformatics software and database (SW/DB) names from biomedical texts. SNAIL integrates complementary lexical and semantic modeling strategies. The lexical component captures orthographic patterns and contextual cues characteristic of SW/DB names, while the semantic component leverages contextual embeddings generated by transformer-based language models such as SciBERT, combined with an explicit token-masking strategy to enhance entity-focused representations. A large training corpus was constructed automatically through a hybrid pipeline that integrates citation-hinted extraction with large language model-assisted distillation. Evaluation on two independent benchmark datasets and real-world research articles demonstrates that SNAIL substantially outperforms existing approaches, including domain-specific methods such as bioNerDS2 and general-purpose large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude. Applying SNAIL to large-scale literature analysis further reveals distinct journal-level preferences across bioinformatics subfields. These results demonstrate that SNAIL provides an accurate and scalable solution for identifying bioinformatics resources in scientific texts and enables systematic meta-analysis of tool usage and research trends.

bioinformatics↗

An open-sourced bioinformatic pipeline for the processing of Next-Generation Sequencing derived nucleotide reads: Identification and authentication of ancient metagenomic DNA.

Bioinformatic pipelines optimised for the processing and assessment of metagenomic ancient DNA (aDNA) are needed for studies that do not make use of high yielding DNA capture techniques. These bioinformatic pipelines are traditionally optimised for broad aDNA purposes, are contingent on selection biases and are associated with high costs. Here we present a bioinformatic pipeline optimised for the identification and assessment of ancient metagenomic DNA without the use of expensive DNA capture techniques. Our pipeline actively conserves aDNA reads, allowing the application of a bioinformatic approach by identifying the shortest reads possible for analysis (22-28bp). The time required for processing is drastically reduced through the use of a 10% segmented non-redundant sequence file (229 hours to 53). Processing speed is improved through the optimisation of BLAST parameters (53 hours to 48). Additionally, the use of multi-alignment authentication in the identification of taxa increases overall confidence of metagenomic results. DNA yields are further increased through the use of an optimal MAPQ setting (MAPQ 25) and the optimisation of the duplicate removal process using multiple sequence identifiers (a 4.35-6.88% better retention). Moreover, characteristic aDNA damage patterns are used to bioinformatically assess ancient vs. modern DNA origin throughout pipeline development. Of additional value, this pipeline uses open-source technologies, which increases its accessibility to the scientific community.

genomics↗

League of Brazilian Bioinformatics: a competition framework to promote scientific training

Backgroundthe scientific training to become a bioinformatician includes multidisciplinary abilities, which increase the challenges to professional development. Competition frameworkin order to improve and promote the ongoing training of the Brazilian bioinformatics community, we organize a national competition, with the main goal to develop human resources and abilities in Computational Biology at the national level. The competition framework was designed in three phases: 1) a one-day challenge composed of 60 multiple-choice questions covering Biology, Computer Science, and Bioinformatics knowledge; 2) five Computational Biology challenges to be solved in three days; and 3) development of an original project evaluated during the 15th X-meeting. Resultsthe first edition of the League of Brazilian Bioinformatics (LBB) counted 168 competitors and 59 groups, distributed into undergraduate students (14.4%), graduate students (12.6% master and 16.8%, Ph.D.), and other professional fields. The first phase selected 46 teams to proceed in the competition, while the second phase selected the three top-performing teams. Conclusionduring the competition, we were able to stimulate teamwork in the main areas of Bioinformatics, with the engagement of all research-level competitors. Furthermore, we identified opportunities to deliver and offer better training to the community and we intend to apply the acquired experience in the second edition of the LBB, which will occur in 2021. Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics

scientific communication and education↗

A meta-analysis of bioinformatics softwarebenchmarks reveals that publication-bias undulyinfluences software accuracy

BackgroundComputational biology provides widely used and powerful software tools for testing and making inferences about biological data. In the face of rapidly increasing volumes of data, heuristic methods that trade software speed for accuracy may be employed. We are have studied these trade-offs using the results of a large number of independent software benchmarks, and evaluated whether external factors are indicative of accurate software. MethodWe have extracted accuracy and speed ranks from independent benchmarks of different bioinformatic software tools, and evaluated whether the speed, author reputation, journal impact, recency and developer efforts are indicative of accuracy. ResultsWe found that software speed, author reputation, journal impact, number of citations and age are all unreliable predictors of software accuracy. This is unfortunate because citations, author and journal reputation are frequently cited reasons for selecting software tools. However, GitHub-derived records and high version numbers show that the accurate bioinformatic software tools are generally the product of many improvements over time, often from multiple developers. DiscussionWe also find that the field of bioinformatics has a large excess of slow and inaccurate software tools, and this is consistent across many sub-disciplines. Meanwhile, there are few tools that are middle-of-road in terms of accuracy and speed trade-offs. We hypothesise that a form of publication-bias influences the publication and development of bioinformatic software. In other words, software that is intermediate in terms of both speed and accuracy may be difficult to publish - possibly due to author, editor and reviewer practices. This leaves an unfortunate hole in the literature as the ideal tools may fall into this gap. For example, high accuracy tools are not always useful if years of CPU time are required, while high speed is not useful if the results are also inaccurate.

bioinformatics↗

BioContainers Registry: searching for bioinformatics tools, packages and containers

1BioContainers is an open-source project that aims to create, store, and distribute bioinformatics software containers and packages. The BioContainers community has developed a set of guidelines to standardize the software containers including the metadata, versions, licenses, and/or software dependencies. BioContainers supports multiple packaging and containers technologies such as Conda, Docker, and Singularity. Here, we introduce the BioContainers Registry and Restful API to make containerized bioinformatics tools more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). BioContainers registry provides a fast and convenient way to find and retrieve bioinformatics tools packages and containers. By doing so, it will increase the use of bioinformatics packages and containers while promoting replicability and reproducibility in research.

bioinformatics↗

NGScloud2: optimized bioinformatic analysis using Amazon Web Services

NGScloud was a bioinformatic system developed to perform de novo RNAseq analysis of non-model species by exploiting the cloud computing capabilities of Amazon Web Services. The rapid changes undergone in the way this cloud computing service operates, along with the continuous release of novel bioinformatic applications to analyze next generation sequencing data, have made the software obsolete. NGScloud2 is an enhanced and expanded version of NGScloud that permits the access to ad hoc cloud computing infrastructure, scaled according to the complexity of each experiment. NGScloud2 presents major technical improvements, such as the possibility of running spot instances and the most updated AWS instances types, that can lead to significant cost savings. As compared to its initial implementation, this improved version updates and includes common applications for de novo RNAseq analysis, and incorporates tools to operate workflows of bioinformatic analysis of reference-based RNAseq, RADseq and functional annotation. NGScloud2 optimizes the access to Amazons large computing infrastructures to easily run popular bioinformatic software applications, otherwise inaccessible to non-specialized users lacking suitable hardware infrastructures. The correct performance of the pipelines for de novo RNAseq, reference-based RNAseq, RADseq and functional annotation was tested with real experimental data. NGScloud2 code, instructions for software installation and use are available at https://github.com/GGFHF/NGScloud2. NGScloud2 includes a companion package, NGShelper that contains python utilities to post-process the output of the pipelines for downstream analysis at https://github.com/GGFHF/NGShelper.

bioinformatics↗

Performances of bioinformatics tools for the analysis of sequencing data of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains

Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains is a new and rapidly growing tool to obtain results regarding resistance, virulence factors and phylogeny of the strains. Bioinformatics tools presented as user-friendly and easy to use are available online. The objective of this work was to evaluate the performances of two bioinformatics tools, easily accessible on the internet, for the analysis of sequencing data of MTBC strains. Two hundred and twenty-seven MTBC strains isolated at the laboratory of the Avicenne Hospital between 2015 and 2021 were sequenced using Illumina(R)(USA) MiSeq technology. An analysis of the sequencing data was performed using the two tools Mykrobe and PhyResSE. Sequencing quality, resistance or susceptibility status and phylogeny were investigated for each strain. Genotypic resistance results were compared to the results obtained by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing performed in the hospitals routine laboratory. Using the PhyResSE tool we found an average coverage of 98% against the reference strain H37Rv and an average depth of 119X. No information on sequencing quality was obtained with the Mykrobe tool. The concordance of each tool with the phenotypic method for determining susceptibility to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs was 95%. Mykrobe and PhyResSE tools identified resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in 5.3% and 5.7% of cases respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool compared to the phenotypic method was respectively 70% and 98% for Mykrobe and 76% and 97% for PhyResSE. Finally, the two tools showed 99.5% agreement in lineage determination. The Mykrobe and PhyResSE bioinformatics tools were easy to use, fast and efficient. The Mykrobe tool had the advantage of being offline and its interface was more user-friendly. The use of these platforms depends on their accessibility and updating. However, their use is accessible to people not trained in bioinformatics and would allow a complementary approach to phenotypic methods for the study of MTBC strains.

bioinformatics↗

Empowering Beginners in Bioinformatics with ChatGPT

The impressive conversational and programming abilities of ChatGPT make it an attractive tool for facilitating the education of bioinformatics data analysis for beginners. In this study, we proposed an iterative model to fine-tune instructions for guiding a ChatGPT in generating code for bioinformatics data analysis tasks. We demonstrated the feasibility of the model by applying it to various bioinformatics topics. Additionally, we discussed practical considerations and limitations regarding the use of the model in chatbot-aided bioinformatics education.

bioinformatics↗

BioMANIA: Simplifying bioinformatics data analysis through conversation

The rapid advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies have produced a wealth of omics data, facilitating significant biological insights but presenting immense computational challenges. Traditional bioinformatics tools require substantial programming expertise, limiting accessibility for experimental researchers. Despite efforts to develop user-friendly platforms, the complexity of these tools continues to hinder efficient biological data analysis. In this paper, we introduce BioMANIA- an AI-driven, natural language-oriented bioinformatics pipeline that addresses these challenges by enabling the automatic and codeless execution of biological analyses. BioMANIA leverages large language models (LLMs) to interpret user instructions and execute sophisticated bioinformatics work-flows, integrating API knowledge from existing Python tools. By streamlining the analysis process, BioMANIA simplifies complex omics data exploration and accelerates bioinformatics research. Compared to relying on general-purpose LLMs to conduct analysis from scratch, BioMANIA, informed by domain-specific biological tools, helps mitigate hallucinations and significantly reduces the likelihood of confusion and errors. Through comprehensive benchmarking and application to diverse biological data, ranging from single-cell omics to electronic health records, we demonstrate BioMANIAs ability to lower technical barriers, enabling more accurate and comprehensive biological discoveries.

bioinformatics↗

"The Metagenomics Days": a simplified workshop on amplicon sequencing analysis with open cloud bioinformatics for eDNA and Microbiomes

The "Metagenomics Days" event was organized to enhance understanding of metagenomics and microbiome analysis among participants new to the field. This paper presents an evaluation of the courses impact through a comprehensive survey administered before and after the event. We assessed participants prior knowledge, experience with bioinformatics tools, and confidence levels regarding key concepts in microbiome analysis. Word clouds generated from open-ended survey responses provided additional insights into participants interests and pre-course familiarity with metagenomic tools and concepts. Surveys results showed substantial improvements in participants confidence, particularly in building bioinformatics pipelines (+41%), understanding diversity metrics (+44.1%), and applying microbiome analysis concepts (+34.8%). Similarly, understanding of core topics like cloud computing (+28%), bioinformatics workflows (+34%), and 16S rRNA gene variable regions (+27.5%) increased significantly. The courses impact on knowledge retention was also evaluated, with participants achieving an average of 64.87% correct responses, with 25.76% unsure answers and only 9.35% incorrect responses, highlighting the effectiveness of the course in enhancing comprehension. Overall, the survey results indicate a significant increase in participants confidence and knowledge acquisition, particularly in the areas of cloud computing, diversity metrics, and bioinformatics pipelines. These improvements in confidence and knowledge acquisition underscore the effectiveness of the course in bridging knowledge gaps and preparing participants for future research in the complex and rapidly evolving fields of metagenomics and microbiome analysis.

bioinformatics↗

Out-of-the-box bioinformatics capabilities of large language models (LLMs)

Large Language Models (LLMs), AI agents and co-scientists promise to accelerate scientific discovery across fields ranging from chemistry to biology. Bioinformatics- the analysis of DNA, RNA and protein sequences plays a crucial role in biological research and is especially amenable to AI-driven automation given its computational nature. Here, we assess the bioinformatics capabilities of three popular general-purpose LLMs on a set of tasks covering basic analytical questions that include code writing and multi-step reasoning in the domain. Utilizing questions from Rosalind, a bioinformatics educational platform, we compare the performance of the LLMs vs. humans on 104 questions undertaken by 110 to 68,760 individuals globally. GPT-3.5 provided correct answers for 59/104 (58%) questions, while Llama-3-70B and GPT-4o answered 49/104 (47%) correctly. GPT-3.5 was the best performing in most categories, followed by Llama-3-70B and then GPT-4o. 71% of the questions were correctly answered by at least one LLM. The best performing categories included DNA analysis, while the worst performing were sequence alignment/comparative genomics and genome assembly. Overall, LLMs performance mirrored that of humans with lower performance in tasks in which humans had low performance and vice versa. However, LLMs also failed in some instances where most humans were correct and, in a few cases, LLMs excelled where most humans failed. To the best of our knowledge, this presents the first assessment of general purpose LLMs on basic bioinformatics tasks in distinct areas relative to the performance of hundreds to thousands of humans. LLMs provide correct answers to several questions that require use of biological knowledge, reasoning, statistical analysis and computer code.

bioinformatics↗

MXP: Modular eXpandable framework for building bioinformatics Pipelines

BackgroundPipelines are a natural tool in bioinformatics applications. Virtually any meaningful processing of biological data involves the execution of multiple software tools, and this execution must be arranged in a coherent manner. Many tools for the building of pipelines were developed over time and used to facilitate work with increasing volume of bioinformatics data. Here we present a flexible and expandable framework for building pipelines, MXP, which we hope will find its own niche in bioinformatics applications.\n\nResultsWe developed MXP and tested it on various tasks in our organization, primarily for building pipelines for GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Studies) and post-GWAS analysis. It was proven to be sufficiently flexible and useful.\n\nConclusionsMXP implements a number of novel features which, from our point of view, make it to be more suitable and more convenient for building bioinformatics pipelines.

bioinformatics↗

Molecular Biology Information Service: An innovative medical library-based bioinformatics support service for biomedical researchers

Biomedical researchers are increasingly reliant on obtaining bioinformatics training in order to conduct their research. Here we present a model that academic institutions may follow to provide such training for their researchers, based on the Molecular Biology Information Service (MBIS) of the Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh. The MBIS runs a four-facet service with the following goals: (1) identify, procure, and implement commercially-licensed bioinformatics software, (2) teach hands-on workshops using bioinformatics tools to solve research questions, (3) provide in-person and email consultations on software/databases, and (4) maintain a web portal providing overall guidance on the access and use of bioinformatics resources and MBIS-created webtools. This paper describes these facets of MBIS activities from 2006-2018, including outcomes from a survey measuring attitudes of University of Pittsburgh researchers about MBIS service and performance.

bioinformatics↗

Deep learning in bioinformatics: introduction, application, and perspective in big data era

Deep learning, which is especially formidable in handling big data, has achieved great success in various fields, including bioinformatics. With the advances of the big data era in biology, it is foreseeable that deep learning will become increasingly important in the field and will be incorporated in vast majorities of analysis pipelines. In this review, we provide both the exoteric introduction of deep learning, and concrete examples and implementations of its representative applications in bioinformatics. We start from the recent achievements of deep learning in the bioinformatics field, pointing out the problems which are suitable to use deep learning. After that, we introduce deep learning in an easy-to-understand fashion, from shallow neural networks to legendary convolutional neural networks, legendary recurrent neural networks, graph neural networks, generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoder, and the most recent state-of-the-art architectures. After that, we provide eight examples, covering five bioinformatics research directions and all the four kinds of data type, with the implementation written in Tensorflow and Keras. Finally, we discuss the common issues, such as overfitting and interpretability, that users will encounter when adopting deep learning methods and provide corresponding suggestions. The implementations are freely available at https://github.com/lykaust15/Deep_learning_examples.

bioinformatics↗

PromptBio-Bench: Benchmarking LLM-based Bioinformatics Agents for End-to-End Data Analysis

Large language model (LLM)-based agents hold transformative potential for automating bioinformatics workflows; however, systematic evaluations of their capabilities remain limited, hindering a clear assessment of their readiness for real-world application. We introduce PromptBio-Bench, a comprehensive evaluation suite of 244 expert-curated tasks spanning bioinformatics and data science at varied difficulty levels, and an evaluation framework for structured file comparison and scoring against expert reference answer files. Evaluation of three state-of-the-art bioinformatics agents revealed comparable performance between Biomni and ToolsGenie, with all agents showing a marked decline in accuracy as task difficulty increased. As foundation models and agent frameworks continue to evolve, PromptBio-Bench provides a valuable benchmark infrastructure for systematically tracking progress in agentic bioinformatics.

bioinformatics↗

A global perspective on bioinformatics training needs

In the last decade, life-science research has become increasingly data-intensive and computational. Nevertheless, basic bioinformatics and data stewardship are still only rarely taught in life-science degree programmes, creating a widening skills gap that spans educational levels and career roles. To better understand this situation, we ran surveys to determine how the skills dearth is affecting the need for bioinformatics training worldwide. Perhaps unsurprisingly, we found that respondents wanted more short courses to help boost their expertise and confidence in data analysis and interpretation. However, it was evident that most respondents appreciated their need for training only after designing their experiments and collecting their data. This is clearly rather late in the research workflow, and suboptimal from a training perspective, as skills acquired to address a specific need at a particular time are seldom retained, engendering a cycle of low confidence in trainees. To ensure that such skill gaps do not continue to create barriers to the progress of research, we argue that universities should strive to bring their life-science curricula into the digital-data era. Meanwhile, the demand for point-of-need training in bioinformatics and data stewardship will grow. While this situation persists, international groups like GOBLET are increasing their efforts to enlarge the community of trainers and quench the global thirst for bioinformatics training.

scientific communication and education↗